A concurrent mixed methods design, giving equal priority to both quantitative and qualitative methods, was used to investigate some of the factors that influence academic achievement of Native Hawaiian students in public schools in the state of Hawai’i. School-level instructional strategies, curricula, policies, and other variables that distinguish more successful schools from less successful schools were a primary focus of the study. Successful schools are those having collaborative school governance structures, linking decision structures to data, having a well-established and dedicated teaching force, having focused learning communities, having engaged leaders, share accountability for their students’ learning, are committed to continuous learning, and that provide effective supplementary and after-school programming.
BauchP. A.GoldringE. B. (1998). Parent-teacher participation in the context of school governance. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(1), 15-35.
2.
BenhamM. K. P. (2006). A challenge to Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander scholars: What the research literature teaches us about our work. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 9(1), 29-50.
3.
CarlsonS. M.CorynC. L. S.UrschelJ. L. (2007). A value-added model of student achievement. Kalamazoo: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
4.
CookT. D.ScrivenM.CorynC. L. S.EvergreenS. D. H. (2010). Contemporary thinking about causation in evaluation: A dialogue with Tom Cook and Michael Scriven. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 105-117.
5.
CorynC. L. S. (2009). Modus operandi. In SullivanL. E. (Ed.), The Sage glossary of the social and behavioral sciences (p. 328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CorynC. L. S.HobsonK. A. (2011). Using nonequivalent dependent variables to reduce internal validity threats in quasi-experiments: Rationale, history, and examples from practice. In MathisonS. (Ed.), Really new directions in evaluation: Young evaluators’ perspectives (New Directions for Evaluation, Vol. 131; pp. 31-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
CorynC. L. S.SchröterD. C.HanssenC. E. (2009). Adding a time-series design element to the Success Case Method to improve methodological rigor: An application for non-profit program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 30, 80-92.
8.
CorynC. L. S.SchröterD. C.MironG.Kana’iaupuniS. K.TibbettsK.Watkins-VictorinoL. M.GustafsonO. W. (2007a). A study of successful schools for Hawaiians: Identifying that which matters. Kalamazoo: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
9.
CorynC. L. S.SchröterD. C.MironG.Kana’iaupuniS. K.TibbettsK. A.Watkins-VictorinoL. M.GustafsonO. W. (2007b). School conditions and academic gains among Native Hawaiians: Identifying successful school strategies—Executive summary and key themes. Kalamazoo: The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
10.
CranstonN. C. (2001). Collaborative decision-making and school-based management: Challenges, rhetoric and reality. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(2), 1-24.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2009a). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
CreswellJ. W. (2009b). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95-108. doi:10.1177/1558689808330883
13.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GutmannM. L.HansonW. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieE. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
GreenwaldR.HedgesL. V.LaineR. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.
15.
GreeneJ. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7-22. doi:10.1177/1558689807309969
16.
HallingerP.HeckR. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44.
17.
HattieJ. A. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
JohnsonJ. C.WellerS. C. (2001). Elicitation techniques for interviewing. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 491-514). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Kana’iaupuniS. K.IshibashiK. (2001). Left behind? The status of Hawaiian students in Hawai’i public schools. Honolulu, HI: Policy Analysis and System Evaluation, Kamehameha Schools.
LeithwoodK. A.JantziD. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 679-706.
22.
LeithwoodK. A.RiehlC. J. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for Student Success, Temple University.
23.
LouisK. S.MarksH. M.KruseS. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757-798.
24.
MertensD. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212-225.
25.
MertensD. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford.
26.
MertensD. M. (2011). Mixed methods as tools for social change. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(3), 195-197.
27.
MorseJ. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieE. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
National Association of Secondary School Principals. (1987). School climate survey. Reston, VA: Author.
29.
OakesJ. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
PittmanK. J.IrbyM.YohalemN.Wilson-AhlstromA. (2004). Blurring the lines for learning: The role of out-of-school programs as compliments to formal learning. New Directions for Youth Development, 101, 19-41.
31.
RiehlC. J. (2000). The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: A review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55-81.
32.
RowanB.BossertS. T.DwyerD. C. (1983). Research on effective schools: A cautionary note. Educational Researcher, 12(4), 24-31.
33.
RyenA. (2001). Cross-cultural interviewing. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 335-354). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
35.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
36.
WellishJ. B.MacQueenA. H.CarriereR. A.DuckG. A. (1978). School management and organization in successful schools. Sociology of Education, 51, 211-226.
37.
YinR. Y. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
