This article provides an examination of a range of mixed methods research projects that employ Internet-mediated technologies (IMT) for data collection. Using a case study approach, this article allows for the uncovering of a process by which IMT are used as a data collection medium in mixed methods praxis. Under the theoretical position of medium theory, the impact of how going online and changing the “mode” of traditional research will be explored. Advantages, drawbacks, as well as ethical issues that emerge for mixed methods using the online medium are highlighted throughout the article. Finally, implications and directions for future research using IMT are discussed.
AndrewsD.NonneckeB.PreeceJ. (2003). Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 185-210.
2.
BeddowsE. (2008). The methodological issues associated with Internet-based research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 6, 124-139.
3.
BellR. A.PaternitiD. A.AzariR.DubersteinP. R.EpsteinR. M.RochlenA. B.. . . KravitzR. L. (2010). Encouraging patients with depressive symptoms to seek care: A mixed methods approach to message development. Patient Education and Counseling, 78, 198-205.
4.
BiddixJ. P.ParkH. H. (2008). Online networks of student protest: The case of the living wage campaign. New Media Society, 10, 871-891.
5.
BuchananE. A.HvizdakE. E. (2009). Online survey tools: Ethical and methodological concerns of human research ethics committees. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4, 37-48.
6.
BuchananT.WilliamsJ. E. (2010). Ethical issues in psychological research on the Internet. In GoslingS. D.JohnsonJ. A. (Eds.), Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research (pp. 255-271). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
CollsteG. (2011) “Under my skin”: The ethics of ambient computing for personal health monitoring. In Hesse-BiberS. N. (Ed.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 89-110). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
CrasbornO. (2010). What does “informed consent” mean in the Internet age? Publishing sign language corpora as open content. Sign Language Studies, 10, 276-290.
10.
DavisM.BoldingG.HartG.SherrL.ElfordJ. (2004). Reflecting on the experience of interviewing online: Perspectives from the Internet and HIV study in London. AIDS Care, 16, 944-952.
11.
DenissenJ. J. A.NeumannL.van ZalkM. (2010). How the Internet is changing the implementation of traditional research methods, people’s daily lives, and the way in which developmental scientists conduct research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34, 564-575.
12.
DicksB.MasonB. (2008). Hypermedia methods for qualitative research. In Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 571-600). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
EagleN. (2011). Mobile phones as sensors for social research. In Hesse-BiberS. N. (Ed.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 492-521). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14.
FarrellD.PetersenJ. C. (2010). The growth of Internet research methods and the reluctant sociologist. Sociological Inquiry, 80, 114-125.
15.
FeldonD. F.KafaiY. B. (2008). Mixed methods for mixed reality: Understanding users’ avatar activities in virtual worlds. Education Technology Research Development, 56, 575-593.
16.
FoxF. E.MorrisM.RumseyN. (2007). Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 539-547.
17.
GoslingS. D.JohnsonJ. A. (Eds.). (2010). Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
GriffithsM. D. (2010). The use of online methodologies in data collection for gambling and gaming addictions. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 8, 8-20.
19.
GunkelD. J. (2011). To tell the truth: The Internet and emergent epistemological challenges in social research. In Nagy Hesse-BiberS. (Ed.) The handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 47-64). Oxford, England: University Press.
20.
HackettE. J. (2011). Possible dreams: Research technologies and transformation of the human sciences. In Nagy Hesse-BiberS. (Ed.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 25-46). Oxford, England: University Press.
21.
Hesse-BiberS. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
22.
Hesse-BiberS. N. (Ed.). (2011). The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
23.
Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (2008). Handbook of emergent methods. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
HewsonC. (2003). Conducting research on the Internet. The Psychologist, 16, 290-293.
25.
HewsonC. (2007). Web-MCQ: A set of methods and freely available open source code for administering online multiple choice question assessments. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 471-481.
26.
HewsonC. (2008). Internet-mediated research as an emergent method and its potential role in facilitating mixed methods research. In Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 543-570). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
HineC. (2008). Internet research as emergent practice. In Nagy Hesse-BiberS.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 525-541). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
HineC. (2009). Question one: How can qualitative Internet researchers define the boundaries of their projects? In MarkhamA. N.BaymN. K. (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 1-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
HookwayN. (2008). “Entering the blogosphere”: Some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qualitative Research, 8, 91-113.
JoinsonA. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 433-438.
35.
JoinsonA. N. (2005). Internet behaviour and the design of virtual methods. In HineC. (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 21-34). Oxford, England: Berg.
36.
KellyM. W.OldhamJ. (1997). The Internet and randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 47, 91-99.
37.
LiebermanD. Z. (2008). Evaluation of the stability and validity of participant samples recruited over the Internet. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 743-745.
38.
MadgeC.O’ConnorH. (2002). Online with e-mums: Exploring the Internet as a medium for research. Area, 34, 92-102.
39.
MarkhamA. N. (2008). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed., pp. 247-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
MarkhamA. N.BaymN. K. (Eds.). (2010). Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
MatthewsJ.CramerE. P. (2008). Using technology to enhance qualitative research with hidden populations. Qualitative Report, 13, 301-315.
42.
MazurE. (2010). Collecting data from social networking web sites and blogs. In GoslingS. D.JohnsonJ. A. (Eds.), Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research (pp. 77-90). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43.
McLuhanM. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1964)
44.
MeyerE. T.SchroederR. (2009). Untangling the web of e-research: Towards a sociology of online knowledge. Journal of Infometrics, 3, 246-260.
45.
MeyrowitzJ. (1985). No sense of place. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
MeyrowitzJ. (1986). Media as social contexts. In RosnowR.GeorgoudiM. (Eds.), Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science (pp. 229-250). New York, NY: Praeger.
47.
MeyrowitzJ. (1994). Medium theory. In CrowleyD.MitchellD. (Eds.), Communication theory today (pp. 50-77). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
48.
MeyrowitzJ. (1997). Shifting worlds of strangers: Medium theory and changes in “Them” versus “Us.”Sociological Inquiry, 67(1), 59-71.
49.
MichaelsonK. L. (1996). Information, community, access. Social Science Computer Review, 14, 57-59.
50.
NipJ. Y. M. (2004a). The queer sisters and its electronic bulletin board: A study of the Internet for social movement mobilization. Information, Communication, & Society, 7(1), 23-49.
51.
NipJ. Y. M. (2004b). The relationship between online and offline communities: The case of the Queer Sisters. Media, Culture, & Society, 26, 409-428.
52.
OrgadS. (2009). Question two: How can researchers make sense of the issues involved in collecting and interpreting online and offline data? In MarkhamA. N.BaymN. K. (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 33-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
ParryM. (2011, July10). Harvard researchers accused of breaching students’ privacy: Social-network project shows promise and peril of doing social science online. Chronicle for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Harvards-Privacy-Meltdown/128166/
54.
Pew Internet and American Life Project (2007). Teens and social media. Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington, DC.
55.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Touchstone Books/Simon & Schuster.
56.
RobinsonL.SchulzJ. (2011). New fieldsites, new methods: New ethnographic opportunities. In Hesse-BiberS. N. (Ed.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 180-198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57.
SchonlauM.van SoestA.KapteynA.CouperM. (2009). Selection bias in Web surveys and the use of propensity scores. Sociological Methods & Research, 37, 291-318.
58.
SteinbergS. J.SteinbergS. L. (2011). Geospatial analysis technology and social science research. In Hesse-BiberS. N. (Ed.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 563-591). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59.
StricklandO. L.MoloneyM. F.DietrichA. S.MyerburgS.CotsonisG. A.JohnsonR. V. (2003). Measurement issues related to data collection on the World Wide Web. Advances in Nursing Science, 26, 246-256.
60.
SudweeksF.SimoffS. J. (1999). Complementary explorative data analysis: The reconciliation of quantitative and qualitative principles. In JonesS. (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp. 29-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA.JohnsonB. (2008). Emergent technologies in gathering and analysis of mixed methods data. In Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 389-413). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
62.
TraversM. (2009). New methods, old problems: A skeptical view of innovation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 9, 161-179.
63.
WilliamsD.DucheneautN.XiongX.ZhangY.YeeN.NickellE. (2006). From tree house to barracks: The social life of guilds in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture, 1, 338-361.
64.
WinstonM. E.EdelbachR. D. (Eds.). (2009). Society, ethics, and technology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson.
