This article demonstrates how a systematic triangulation of research perspectives can provide a methodological framework for the practice of mixed methods research. The authors illustrate the application of a “systematic approach” by focusing on an in-depth case study concerning the management of sleeping problems in nursing homes. Two sources of quantitative data (assessment of the status of residents and medication prescribed by physicians) and several contextualized qualitative approaches—one that focuses on physicians’ interpretive patterns concerning their prescription practices, and another that looks at nursing staff and nursing home residents’ attitudes toward sleep medication—are triangulated. The authors discuss the levels on which these perspectives can be linked, as well as the implications of their case study analysis for the methodological development of a mixed methods approach that is tied to the concept of triangulation.
BrymanA. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative research: Further reflections on their integration. In BrannenJ. (Ed.), Mixing methods: Quantitative and qualitative research (pp. 57-80). Aldershot, England: Avebury.
2.
BrymanA. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done?Qualitative Research, 6, 97-113.
3.
ChristT. W. (2010). Teaching mixed methods and action research: Pedagogical, practical, and evaluative considerations. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 643-676). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95-108.
5.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
DenzinN. K. (1970). The research act. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
7.
DenzinN. K. (1989). The research act (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
DenzinN. K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 419-427.
9.
FlickU. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of or alternative to validation of qualitative data. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 35, 175-197.
10.
FlickU. (2000). Episodic interviewing. In BauerM.GaskellG. (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 75-92). London, England: SAGE.
11.
FlickU. (2008). Managing quality in qualitative research. London, England: SAGE.
12.
FlickU. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London, England: SAGE.
13.
FlickU. (2010). Triangulation of micro-perspectives on juvenile homelessness, health and human rights. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and human rights (pp. 186-204). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
14.
FlickU. (2011a). Introducing research methodology: A beginners’ guide to doing a research project. London, England: SAGE.
15.
FlickU. (2011b). Mixing methods, triangulation and integrated research: Challenges for qualitative research in a world of crisis. In DenzinN.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and global crisis (pp. 132-152). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
16.
FlickU.FischerC.NeuberA.WalterU.SchwartzF. W. (2003). Health in the context of being old: Representations held by health professionals. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 539-556.
17.
FlickU.Garms-HomolováV.RöhnschG. (2010). “When they sleep, they sleep”: Daytime activities and sleep disorders in nursing homes. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 755-764.
18.
FlickU.RöhnschG. (2007). Idealization and neglect: Health concepts of homeless adolescents. Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 737-750.
19.
Garms-HomolováV.FlickU. (Eds.). (in press). Schlafqualität und Management von Schlafstörungen im Alter [Sleep quality and management of sleep disorders in old age]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
20.
Garms-HomolováV.FlickU.RöhnschG. (2010). Sleep disorders and activities in long term care facilities: A vicious cycle?Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 744-754.
21.
Garms-HomolováV.GilgenR. (Eds.). (2000). RAI 2.0 Resident Assessment Instrument. Beurteilung, Dokumentation und Pflegeplanung in der Langzeitpflege und geriatrischen Rehabilitation [RAI 2.0 Resident assessment instrument. Assessement, documentation, and planning of nursing in longterm care and geriatric rehabilitation]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.
22.
GreeneJ. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7-22.
23.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
24.
HerrmannW. J. (2011). Guter Schlaf: Subjektive Konzepte und Erfahrungen von Pflegeheimbewohnerinnen und Pflegeheimbewohnern [Good sleep: Subjective concepts and experiences of nursing home residents] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
25.
HerrmannW. J.FlickU. (2011). Nursing home residents’ self-perceived resources for good sleep. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 29, 247-251.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
28.
KelleU.ErzbergerC. (2004). Quantitative and qualitative methods: No confrontation. In FlickU.KardorffE. V.SteinkeI. (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 172-177). London, England: SAGE.
29.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London, England: SAGE.
30.
MasonJ. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively-driven way. Qualitative Research, 6, 9-26.
31.
MertensD. M.BledsoeK. L.SullivanM.WilsonA. (2010). Utilization of mixed methods for transformative purposes. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 193-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
MorrisJ.MurphyK.NonemakerS.HawesC.PhillipsC.FriesB.MorV. (1995). Long term care resident assessment instrument. Users manual 2.0. Chapel Hill, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
33.
MorseJ.NiehausL. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
34.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
