The purpose of this article is to describe how a mixed methods approach was employed to acquire a better understanding of Black male student athletes’ experiences at a historically Black college/university in the southeastern United States. A concurrent triangulation design was incorporated to allow different data sources to be collected and analyzed simultaneously to identify areas of convergence. Quantitative findings served as complementary data to corroborate the emergent qualitative themes. Legitimation strategies were applied in identifying meta-inferences from the analysis of findings, which enabled a more comprehensive understanding of key institutional characteristics that contributed to Black male student athletes’ academic achievement and positive college experiences at a historically Black college/university.
American Institutes for Research. (1988). Summary results from the 1987-1988 national study of intercollegiate athletics (Report No. 1; Studies in Intercollegiate Athletics). Palo Alto, CA: Center for the Study of Athletics.
2.
American Institutes for Research. (1989). The experiences of Black intercollegiate athletes at NCAA division I institutions (Report No. 3; Studies in Intercollegiate Athletics). Palo Alto, CA: Center for the Study of Athletics.
3.
AndersenM. B.WilliamsJ. M.AldridgeT.TaylorJ. (1997). Tracking the training and careers of advanced degree programs in sport psychology, 1989 to 1994. The Sport Psychologist, 11, 326-344.
4.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
AstinA. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 518-529.
6.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
7.
BiddleS.MarklandD.GilbourneD.ChatzisarantisN.SparkesA. (2001). Research methods in sport and exercise psychology: Quantitative and qualitative issues. Journal of Sport Sciences, 19, 777-809.
8.
BowenG. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
9.
BrewerB. W.Van RaalteJ. L.LinderD. E. (1993). Athletic identity: Hercules’ muscles or Achilles heel?International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 237-254.
10.
CharltonR. (2011). The role of policy, rituals, and language in shaping an academically focused culture in HBCU athletics. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 4, 120-148.
11.
ComeauxE.HarrisonC. K. (2007). Faculty and male student-athletes: Racial differences in the environmental predictors of academic achievement. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 10, 199-214.
12.
CooperJ. N.HawkinsB. (2012). A place of opportunity: Black male student athletes’ experiences at a historically Black university. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 5, 170-188.
13.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DenzinN. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
16.
EicheK.SedlacekW. E.Adams-GastonJ. (1997). Comparing university athletes to nonathletes on attitudes and perceptions (Research Report No. 5-97). College Park: University of Maryland.
17.
FinkA. (2009). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Gaston-GaylesJ. L. (2004). Examining academic and athletic motivation among student athletes at a Division I university. Journal of College Student Development, 45(1), 75-83.
19.
GlaserB.StraussA. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
20.
GrattonC.JonesI. (2010). Research methods for sport studies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
22.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
23.
KitzingerJ. (1995). Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299-302.
24.
KraneV.AndersonM.SteanW. (1997). Issues of qualitative research methods and presentation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 19, 213-218.
25.
MartinB.EklundR. C.MushettC. A. (1997). Factors structure of the athletic identity measurement scale with athletes with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 14, 74-82.
26.
MartinB.HarrisonC. K.StoneJ.LawrenceS. M. (2010). Athletic voices and academic victories: African American male student-athlete experiences in the Pac Ten. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 34, 131-153.
PurdyD. A.EitzenD. S.HufnagelR. (1985). Are athletes also students? The educational attainment of college athletes. In ChuD.SegraveJ. O.BeckerB. J. (Eds.), Sport and higher education (pp. 221-234). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
36.
RoulstonK. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory & practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
RyanG. W.BernardH. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
ScanlanT. K.RavizzaK.SteinG. (1989). An in-depth study of former elite figure skaters: II. Sources of enjoyment. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 65-82.
39.
ScanlanT. K.SteinG.RavizzaK. (1991). Sources of stress in elite figure skaters. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 13, 103-120.
40.
SedlacekW. E.Adams-GastonJ. (1992). Predicting the academic successor student-athlete: Using SAT and noncognitive variables. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 724-727.
41.
SellersR. M. (1992). Racial differences in the predictors for academic achievement of student-athletes in division I revenue producing sports. Sociology of Sport Journal, 9(1), 48-59.
42.
SellersR. M.KupermincG. P.WaddellA. S. (1991). Life experiences of Black student-athletes in revenue producing sports: A descriptive empirical analysis. Academic Athletic Journal, Fall, 21-38.
