This article challenges the idea that mixed methods research (MMR) constitutes a coherent research paradigm and explores how different research paradigms exist within MMR. Tracing paradigmatic differences at the level of methods, ontology, and epistemology, two MMR strategies are discussed: nested analysis, recently presented by the American political scientist Evan S. Lieberman, and praxeological knowledge, inspired by the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. These strategies address two different epistemological problems, namely, the problem of causal inference and the problem of double hermeneutics. Consequently, the research designs as well as the understandings of the “qualitative component” differ noticeably. Realizing such differences at the ontological, epistemological, and methodological level contributes to discussions on how to move forward MMR, embracing differences instead of imposing homogeneity.
Alise, M.A., & Teddlie, C. ( 2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103-126.
2.
Archer, M.S. ( 2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bachelard, G. ( 1968). The philosophy of no. A philosophy of the new scientific mind. New York, NY: Orlon.
4.
Benhabib, S. ( 1986). Critique, norm and utopia. A study of the foundations of critical theory. New York. NY: Columbia University Press.
5.
Bennett, A., & Elman, C. ( 2006). Complex causal relations and case study methods: The example of path dependence. Political Analysis, 14, 250-267.
6.
Bennett, A., & Elman, C. ( 2007). Case study methods in the international relations subfield . Comparative Political Studies, 40, 170-195.
7.
Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E.B., Warde, A., Gayo-Cal, M., & Wright, C. ( 2009). Culture, class, distinction. London , England: Routledge.
8.
Bernstein, R.J. ( 1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
Bernstein, R.J. ( 1992). The resurgence of pragmatism. Social Research, 59, 813-840.
10.
Bhaskar, R. ( 1978). A realist theory of science. Sussex , England: Harvester Press.
11.
Blakie, N. ( 2010). Designing social research (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
12.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1973). The three forms of theoretical knowledge. Social Science Information, 12, 53-80.
13.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste . London, England: Routledge.
14.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1996). The state nobility. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
16.
Bourdieu, P. ( 2000). Pascalian meditations. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
17.
Bourdieu, P. ( 2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. (Original work published 2001)
18.
Bourdieu, P., Accardo, A., Balazs, G., Beaud, S., Bonvin, F., Boudieu, E., . . . Wacquant, L.J.D. (1999). The weight of the world. Social suffering in contemporary society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
19.
Bourdieu, P., Chamboredon, J.-C., & Passeron, J.-C. (1991). The craft of sociology-Epistemological preliminaries. Berlin, Germany: Verlag Walter de Gruyter. (Original work published 1968 )
20.
Brady, H.E. ( 2008), Causation and explanation. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady , & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 217-270). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21.
Broady, D. ( 1991). Sociologi og Epistemologi. Om Pierre Bourdieus författerskap och den historiske epistemologin [Sociology and Epistemology: On Pierre Bourdieu and Historical Epistemology]. Stockholm, Sweden: HLS Förlag.
22.
Bryman, A. ( 2006a). Integration quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6, 97-113.
23.
Bryman, A. ( 2006b). Mixed methods I-IV. London, England: SAGE.
24.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. ( 1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
25.
Collier, D., & Brady, H.E. ( 2004). Rethinking social inquiry. Diverse tools, shared standards . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
26.
Collier, D., & Mahoney, J. ( 1996). Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, 49, 56-91.
27.
Collier, D., Brady, H.E., & Seawright, J. ( 2004). Sources of leverage in causal inference: Toward an alternative view of methodology. In D. Collier & H. E. Brady (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry. Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 229-266). Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield.
28.
Creswell, J.W., & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Editorial: Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research , 1(4), 303-308.
29.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2008). The mixed methods reader . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
Creswell, J.W., Shope, R., Plano Clark, V.L., & Green, D.O. ( 2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13, 1-11.
32.
de Vaus, D. ( 2001). Research design in social research. London, England: SAGE.
33.
Denscombe, M. ( 2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research , 2(3), 270-283.
34.
Dewey, J. ( 1991). The pattern of inquiry. In J. Dewey (Ed.), The later works (p. 12). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
35.
Faeron, J.D., & Laitin, D.D. ( 2008). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), Political methodology (pp. 756-776). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36.
Felizer, M.Y. ( 2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16.
37.
Fries, C. ( 2009). Bourdieu’s reflexive sociology as a theoretical basis for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(4), 326-348.
38.
George, A.L., & Bennett, A. ( 2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences . Cambridge: MIT Press.
39.
Gerring, J. ( 2007). Case study research. Principles and practices. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Giddens, A. ( 1993). New rules of sociological methods (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Polity Press. (Original work published 1976)
41.
Glennan, S.S. ( 1996). Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis, 44, 49-71.
42.
Greene, J.C. ( 2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
43.
Habermas, J. ( 1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band I+II [The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol I+II]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
44.
Habermas, J. ( 1999). Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Philosophische Aufsätze [Truth and Justification]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
45.
Harrington, A. ( 2000). In defence of Verstehen and Erklären: Wilhelm Dilthey’s ideas concerning a descriptive and analytical psychology. Theory and Psychology, 10, 435-451.
46.
Harrits, G.S. ( 2005). Hvad betyder klasse? En rekonstruktion af klassebegrebet med henblik på en analyse af sammenhængen mellem klasser og politisk deltagelse i Danmark [The meaning and importance of class. Reconstructing the concept of social class and analysing the relationship between social class and political participation in Denmark]. Århus , Denmark: Forlaget Politica.
47.
Holland, P.W. ( 1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of American Statistical Association, 81, 945-960.
48.
Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher , 33, 14-26.
49.
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Turner, L.A. ( 2007). Towards a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
50.
Kelle, U., & Erzberger, C. ( 1999). Integration Qualitativer und Quantitativer Methoden. Methodologische Modelle und ihre Bedeutung für die Forschungspraxis [The Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods, Methodological Models and their impact on research practice]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsykologie, 51, 509-531.
51.
Khong,Y.F. ( 1992). Analogies at war: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
King, G., Keohane, R.O., & Verba, S. ( 1994). Designing social inquiry. Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53.
Kuhn, T. ( 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., enlarged). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962 )
54.
Kvale, S. ( 1996). InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing . London, England: SAGE.
55.
Leech, N.L., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2009). A typology of mixed method research designs. Quality and Quantity, 43, 265-275.
56.
Lieberman, E.S. ( 2003). Race and regionalism in the politics of taxation in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Lieberman, E.S. ( 2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99, 435-452.
58.
Luetgert, B., & Dannwolf, T. ( 2009). Mixing methods: A nested analysis of EU member state transposition patterns. European Union Politics, 10, 307-334.
59.
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C.F. ( 2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1-25.
Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. ( 2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14, 227-249.
62.
Makkreel, R.A. ( 1975). Dilthey. Philosopher of the human studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
Maxwell, J.A. ( 2004a). Qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education . Educational Researcher, 33, 3-11.
64.
Maxwell, J.A. ( 2004b). Using qualitative methods for causal explanation. Field Methods, 16, 243-264.
65.
Moravcsik, A. ( 1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
66.
Morgan, D.L. ( 2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.
67.
Mos, L.P. ( 1998). On methodological distinctions: Nomothetic psychology, or historical understanding. Theory and Psychology, 8, 39-57.
68.
Munck, G.L., & Snyder, R. ( 2007a). Debating the direction of comparative politics: An analysis of leading journals. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 5-31.
69.
Munck, G.L., & Snyder, R. ( 2007b). Rejoinder: Visions of comparative politics. A reply to Mahoney and Wibbels. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 45-47.
70.
Munck, G.L., & Verkuilen, J. ( 2005). Research designs. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 3, 385-395.
71.
Natasi, B.K., Hitchcock, J.H., & Brown, L.M. ( 2010). An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies. Moving towards fully integrated synergistic research models . In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (3rd ed., pp. 305-338). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
72.
Pitkin, H.F. ( 1972). Wittgenstein and justice. On the significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for social and political thought. Berkeley : University of California Press.
73.
Ragin, C.C. ( 1987). The comparative method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
74.
Rohlfing, I. ( 2008). What you see and what you get. Pitfalls and principles of nested analysis in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 1492-1514.
75.
Rouanet, H., Ackermann, W., & Le Roux, B. (2000). The geometric analysis of questionnaires: The lesson of Bourdieu’s La Distinction. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 65, 5-15.
76.
Sayer, A. ( 1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
77.
Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. ( 2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt [Structures of the life-world] . Konstanz, Germany: UKV Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
78.
Scott, P.J., & Briggs, J.A. ( 2009). A pragmatist argument for mixed methodology in medical informatics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 223-241.
79.
Silva, E.B., & Wright, D. ( 2008). Researching cultural capital: Complexities in mixing methods. Methodological Innovations, 2(3). Retrieved from http://erdt.plymouth.ac.uk/mionline/public_html/viewarticle.php?id=65&layout=html
80.
Silva, E.B., Warde, A., & Wright, D. ( 2009). Using mixed methods for analyzing culture: The Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion Project. Cultural Sociology, 3, 299-316.
81.
Tannenwald, N. ( 1999) The nuclear taboo: The United States and the normative basis of nuclear non-use. International Organization, 53, 433-468.
82.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. ( 2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
83.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
84.
Tönnies, F. ( 1964). Community and society. East Lansing : Michigan State University Press. (Original work published 1912)
85.
Weininger, E.B. ( 2002). Class and causation in Bourdieu. In J. M. Lehmann (Ed.), Current perspectives in social theory: Bringing capitalism back for critique by social theory (Vol. 21, pp. 49-114). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
86.
Yanow, D. ( 2005). In the house of "science," there are many rooms. In K. Renwick Monroe (Ed.), Perestroika. The Racucous rebellion in political science (pp. 200-217). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
