Bergman, M. (2008). (Ed). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
Creswell, J.W. ( 2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
Dellinger, M. ( 2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research , 2, pp. 270-283.
4.
Denscombe, M. ( 2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research , 2, pp. 270-283.
5.
Greene, J.C. ( 2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology ? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, pp. 7-22.
6.
Greene, J.C. ( 2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Hesse-Biber, S. (in press). Mixed methods. NY: Guilford.
8.
Johnson, B. & Christensen, J. ( 2008). Educational research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
Johnson, R.B. , Onweugbuzie, A.J. & Turner, L.A. ( 2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, pp. 112-133.
10.
Mertens, D.M. ( 2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
Mertens, D.M. ( 2009). Transformative research and evaluation. NY: Guilford Press.
12.
Mertens, D.M. ( 2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice . Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Jul 2007 ; vol. 1: pp. 212 - 225.
13.
Morgan, D. ( 2007). Paradigm lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, pp. 112-133.
14.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (in press). Handbook of Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. ( 2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16.
Orszab, P.R. (October 7, 2009). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Increased emphasis on program evaluations. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.
