The article explores qualitative geography and qualitative social science as sites of mixed methods research practice. The authors argue that there is an emergent convergence of methodologies and analytical purposes between qualitative geography and qualitative social science. The authors show how methodological and analytical convergence has been enabled by technological convergence between geographical information systems (GIS) and qualitative software (CAQDAS). The argument is illustrated by examples of convergent geo-referenced mixed methods studies, including a main example from research on reproductive health in Paraguay.
Amsden, J., & VanWynsberghe, R. (2005). Community mapping as a research tool with youth. Action Research, 3, 357-381.
2.
Andes, K.L. & Cisneros-Puebla, C. ( 2009). Salud Sexual y Reproductiva en Adolescentes en Asuncion, Paraguay: Una Evaluacion Cualitativa de Necesidades. Asuncion, Paraguay, South America: Centro Paraguayo de Estudios de Poblacion (CEPEP).
3.
Bazeley, P. ( 2003) Computerized data analysis for mixed methods research . In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 385-422). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
Bazeley, P. ( 2004). Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. In R. Buber, J. Gadner, & L. Richards (Eds.), Applying qualitative methods to marketing management research (pp. 141-156). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
5.
Bazeley, P. ( 2006). The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data and analysis. Research in the Schools, 13, 63-73.
6.
Carmichael, P. ( 2002, May). Extensible mark-up language and qualitative data analysis. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung, 3(2). Retrieved July 27, 2009, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-02carmichael-e.htm
7.
Cope, M., & Elwood, S. (2009). Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Creswell, J. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 95-108.
DeLyser, D., Aitken, S., Crang, M., Herbert, S., & McDowell, L. ( 2009). Handbook of qualitative research in human geography, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
Doel, M. ( 2001). Qualified quantitative geography. Environment and Planning D, 19, 555-572.
11.
Egenhofer, M., & Mark, D. ( 1995). Naïïve geography. In A. Frank & W. Kuhn (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 988, pp. 1-15). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Elwood, S. ( 2006). Participatory GIS and community planning. In S. Balram & S. Dragicevic (Eds.), Collaborative geographic information systems (pp. 66-84). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
13.
Elwood, S., Feliciano, R., Gems, K., Gulasingam, N., Howard, W., Mackin, R., et al. (2007). Participatory GIS: The Humboldt/West Humboldt park community GIS project. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods (pp. 170-178). New York: Routledge .
14.
Fetters, M., Yoshioka, T., Greenberg, G., Gorenflo, D., & Yeo, S. ( 2007). Advanced consent in Japanese during prenatal care. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 333-365
Fielding, N.G., & Lee, R.M. ( 2002). New patterns in the adoption and use of qualitative software . Field Methods, 14, 197-216.
17.
Goodchild, M., Anselin, L., Appelbaum, R., & Harthorn, B. ( 2000). Toward spatially integrated social science. International Regional Science Review, 23, 139-159.
18.
Greene, J., Caracelli, V., & Graham, W. ( 1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
19.
Greene, J. ( 2008). Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology ? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 1, 7-22.
20.
Haraway, D. ( 1996). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial knowledge. In J. Agnew, D. N. Livingstone, & A. Rodgers (Eds.), Human geography: An essential anthology (pp. 108-128). Malden, MA: Blackwell .
21.
Harris, T.M., Weiner, D., Warner, T., & Levin, R. ( 1995). Pursuing social goals through participatory GIS. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth (pp. 196-222). New York: Guilford Press.
22.
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Turner, L. ( 2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133.
23.
Jung, K.-I. ( 2009). Computer-aided qualitative GIS: A software-level integration of qualitative research and GIS. In M. Cope & S. Elwood (Ed.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. (pp.115-135) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
24.
Kelle, U. ( 1996). Computer-aided qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
Knigge, L., & Cope, M. ( 2006). Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A, 38, 2021-2037.
26.
Kuckartz, U. ( 1995). Case-oriented quantification. In U. Kelle (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
Kwan, M.-P. ( 2002a). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 645-661.
28.
Kwan, M.-P. ( 2002b). Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s. Gender, Place and Culture, 9, 271-279.
29.
Kwan, M.-P. ( 2007). Critical GIS. In K. Kemp (Ed.), Encyclopedia of geographic information science (pp. 56-57). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
Kwan, M.-P., & Ding, G. ( 2008). Geo-narrative: Extending GIS for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed method research. The Professional Geographer , 60(4), 1-30.
31.
Kwan, M.-P., & Lee, J. ( 2004). Geovisualisation of human activity patterns using 3D GIS. In M. Goodchild & D. Janelle (Eds.), Spatially integrated social science (pp. 48-66). NewYork: Oxford University Press.
32.
Lee, Y.-J., & Greene, J. ( 2007). The predictive validity of an ESL placement test. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 366-389.
33.
Marble, D. ( 1990). The potential methodological impact of geographic information systems on the social sciences. In K. Allen, S. Green, & E. Zubrow (Eds.), Interpreting space: GIS and archaelogy (pp. 9-21). London: Taylor & Francis.
34.
Matthews, S., Detwiler, J., & Burton, L. ( 2005). Geo-ethnography: Coupling geographic information analysis techniques with ethnographic methods in urban research. Cartographica , 40(4), 75-90.
35.
Mertens, D. ( 2003). Mixed models and the politics of human research. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135-166). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
Morse, J. ( 1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
37.
Nightingale, A. ( 2003). A feminist in the forest: Situated knowledges and mixing methods in natural resource management. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 2, 77-90.
38.
Pavlovskaya, M.E. ( 2002). Mapping urban change and changing GIS. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 9, 281-289.
39.
Pavlovskaya, M.E. ( 2006). Theorizing with GIS: A tool for critical geographies ? Environment and Planning A, 38, 2003-2020.
40.
Pickles, J. ( 1995). Ground truth: The social implications of geographical information systems. New York: Guilford.
41.
Pickles, J. ( 2006). Commentary: Ground truth 1995-2005. Transactions in GIS, 10, 763-772.
42.
Rossman, G., & Wilson, B. ( 1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9, 627-643.
43.
Ruvane, M., & Dobbs, R. ( 2008) Genealogy, historical geography, and GIS: Parcel mapping, information synergies, and collaborative opportunities. In D. J. Timothy & J. K. Guelke (Eds.), Geography and genealogy (pp. 43-61). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
44.
Schuurman, N. ( 2000). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 569-590.
45.
Schuurman, N. ( 2006). Formalization matters: Critical GIS and ontology research . Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(4), 726-739.
46.
Sheppard, E. ( 2005). Knowledge production through critical GIS. Cartographica, 40(4), 5-21.
47.
Skinner, D., Matthews, S.A. & Burton, L.M. ( 2005). Combining ethnography and GIS technology to examine constructions of developmental opportunities in contexts of poverty and disability. In T. S. Weisner (Ed.), Discovering successful pathways in children’s development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life (pp. 223-239). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Sullivan, D. ( 2006). Geographical information science: critical GIS. Progress in Human Geography, 30, 783-791.
49.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
Weitzman, E. & Miles, M. ( 1995). Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
51.
Weir, S.S., Morroni, C., Coetzee, N., Spencer, J., & Boerma, J.T. ( 2002). A pilot study of a rapid assessment method to identify places for AIDS prevention in Cape Town, South Africa. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 78(Suppl. I), i106-i113.
