Teaching mixed methods research is difficult. This longitudinal explanatory study examined how two classes were designed, taught, and evaluated. Curriculum, Research, and Teaching (EDCS-606) and Mixed Methods Research (EDCS-780) used a research proposal generation process to highlight the importance of the purpose, research question and methodology relationship following eight interactive features: (a) problem/focus of the study; (b) intended audience; (c) the role of the researcher; (d) theory, (e) exploratory, explanatory, confirmatory, and/or critical design; (f) how the project is ‘‘bound’’; (g) sampling; and (h) validity/ credibility issues. Advanced organizers and concept maps were included in the introductory and advanced research classes to support students. Analysis of the case studies revealed the curricula and strategies markedly improved student dissertation and thesis proposals.
Bergman, M. ( 2008). Advances in mixed methods research theories and applications . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. ( 2005). Multimethod research: A synthesis of style. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
3.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. ( 1983). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
4.
Charmaz, K. ( 2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 675-694). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
Charmaz, K. ( 2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
Christ, T. ( 2006). Longitudinal cross case analysis of support services for students with disabilities in postsecondary education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
7.
Christ, T. ( 2007). A recursive approach to mixed methods research in a longitudinal study of postsecondary education disability support services. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 226-241.
8.
Christ, T. ( 2008a, April). Mixed methods diagram-recursive grounded technique in longitudinal multistage mixed methods study of disability supports: Emerging research questions. Paper and diagram presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New York.
9.
Christ, T. ( 2008b). Technology support services in postsecondary education . A mixed methods study. Technology and Disability, 20, 25-35.
10.
Christ, T. ( 2008c). A cross-case analysis of leadership qualities in three postsecondary disability support centers. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 2, 223-230.
11.
Christ, T. ( 2009a, February). Teaching mixed methods and action research . Paper and diagrams presented at the 2009 Hawaii Educational Research Association, Honolulu, HI.
12.
Christ, T. ( 2009b). Mixed methods research. In D. Ary, L. Cheser-Jacobs, A. Razavieh, & C. Sorensen (Eds.), Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
13.
Christ, T. ( 2009c, February). Mixed methods and action research in disability studies. Workshop presented at the 25th annual Pacific Rim Conference, Honolulu, HI.
14.
Christ, T. & Makarani, S. ( 2009). Teachers’ attitudes about teaching English in India: An embedded mixed methods study. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 73-87.
15.
Creswell, J. ( 2006, April). Continuing the discourse: Advocates for and challengers to mixed methods research. Symposium conducted at the American Education Research Association Mixed Methods SIG Business Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
16.
Creswell, J. ( 2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
17.
Creswell, J. ( 2009a). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 95-108.
18.
Creswell, J. ( 2009b). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE.
19.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
Creswell, J., & Tashakkori, A. (2008). How do research manuscripts contribute to the literature? Journal of Mixed Methods Research , 2, 115-120.
21.
Creswell, J., Tashakkori, A., Jensen, K., & Shapley, K.L. ( 2003). Teaching mixed methods research: Practices, dilemmas, and challenges. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 619-637). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
Collins, K., & O’Cathain, A.(2009) Ten points about mixed methods research to be considered by the novice researcher. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 2-7.
23.
Collins, K., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Sutton, I. ( 2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67-100.
24.
Crotty, M. ( 1998). Foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J.C. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge.
26.
Earley, M.A. ( 2007). Developing a syllabus for a mixed methods research course . International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10, 145-162.
27.
Frauley, J., & Pearce, F. (Eds.). (2007). Critical realism and the social sciences: Heterodox elaborations. Toronto, Ontario , Canada: University of Toronto Press.
28.
Greenaway, A., Milne, S., Henwood, W., Asiasiga, L., & Witten, K. ( 2004). A meta-analysis of community action projects (Vol. 1) . Paper presented for the Centre for Social and Health Outcomes Research and Evaluation. Auckland, New Zealand: Massey University.
29.
Greene, J. ( 2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Glazer, B. ( 1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
31.
Hui, M., & Grossman, D. J. (Eds.). (2008). Improving teacher education through action research. London: Routledge.
32.
Institutional Research Office. (2008). University of Hawaii at Manoa racial demographics. Retrieved September 11, 2008, from http://www.hawaii.edu/iro
33.
Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher , 33(7), 14-26.
34.
Johnson, R., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Turner, L. ( 2007). Towards a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133.
35.
Lather, P. ( 2004). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 15-34.
36.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. ( 2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
Maxwell, J. ( 2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE.
38.
Maxwell, J., & Loomis, D. ( 2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-384). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
Mertens, D. ( 2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice . Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 212-225.
40.
Mertler, C. ( 2006). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE.
41.
Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. ( 2006) The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 1-10.
Niglas, K. ( 2006, September). Introducing the qualitative-quantitative continuum: An alternative view of teaching research methods courses. Paper and diagrams presented at the 2006 European Conference on Educational Research, Geneva, Switzerland.
44.
Niglas, K. ( 2007). Introducing the qualitative-quantitative continuum: An alternative view of teaching research methods courses. In M. Murtonen, J. Rautopuro , & P. Väisänen (Eds.), Learning and teaching of research methods at university (pp. 185-203). Turku, Finland: Finnish Educational Research Association .
45.
Onwuegbuzie, A. ( 2007). Mixed methods research in sociology and beyond. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of sociology (Vol. 6, pp. 2978-2981). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
46.
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Johnson, R. ( 2006). The validity issue in mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13, 48-63.
47.
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. ( 2005). Taking the ‘‘Q’’ out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 39, 267-296.
48.
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. ( 2009). Lessons learned for teaching mixed research: A framework for novice researchers. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 105-107.
49.
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Teddlie, C. ( 2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research . In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-384). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
Patton, M. ( 1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34, 1189-1208.
51.
Patton, M. ( 2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
52.
Plano Clark, V. ( 2005). Cross-disciplinary analysis of the use of mixed methods in physics education research, counseling psychology, and primary care. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 02A.
53.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. ( 2008). Introduction. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 1-10). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
54.
Ridenour, C., & Newman, I. ( 2008). Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum . Carbon-dale: Southern Illinois University Press.
55.
Saks, M., & Allport, J. (Eds.). (2007). Researching health: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
56.
Sayer, A. ( 1992). Method in social science: A realist approach. London: Routledge.
57.
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. ( 2007). Developing publishable mixed methods manuscripts. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 107-111.
58.
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. ( 2008). Envisioning the future stewards of the social-behavioral research enterprise. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 291-295.
59.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
62.
Taylor, S., Rudolph, J., & Foldy, G. ( 2008). Teaching reflective practice in the action science/action inquiry tradition: Key stages, concepts and practices. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 656-668). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
