Bazeley, P. (2006). The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data and analyses. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 63-73.
2.
Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage.
3.
Bazeley, P. (2009). Mixed methods data analysis. In S. Andrew & E. Halcomb (Eds.), Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences (pp. 84-118). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
4.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (2006). Foundations of multimethod research: Synthesizing styles (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.
6.
Caracelli, V., & Greene, J. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 195-207.
7.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Dixon, J.K. (2009). Review of: M. Kane & W. M. K. Trochim (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage). Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 87-89.
9.
Green, J., Statham, H., & Solomou, W. (2008). Assessing satisfaction: Insights from a multi-methods study (NCRM Working Paper No. 462). ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/462/
10.
Greene, J.C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Jones, A., & Bugge, C. (2006). Improving understanding and rigour through triangulation: An exemplar based on patient participation in interaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(5), 612-621.
12.
Kane, M., & Trochim, W.M.K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Kuckartz, U. (1995). Case-oriented quantification. In U. Kelle (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods, and practice (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Maxwell, J.A. (2008). The value of a realist understanding of causality for qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of evidence (pp. 163-181). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
15.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V.D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., et al. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45-59.
17.
Niglas, K. (2007). Review of: Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheet software. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 297-299.
18.
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Integration and publications as indicators of ``yield'' from mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 147-163.
19.
Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Ragin, C.C., Shulman, D., Weinberg, A., & Gran, B. (2003). Complexity, generality, and qualitative comparative analysis. Field Methods, 15(4), 323-340.
21.
Scott, S.B., Bergeman, C.S., Verney, A., Longenbaker, S., Markey, M.A., & Bisconti, T.L. (2007). Social support in widowhood: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 242-266.
22.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
23.
Woolley, C.M. (2009). Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(1), 7-25.
24.
Yin, R.K. (2006). Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools, 13(1), 41-47.