No mixed methods research design blends typological and systemic approaches into a cohesive, multifaceted whole. A synergistic approach to mixed methods research uses the inherent strengths of both types of approaches, providing researchers with a comprehensive framework for making pivotal research design decisions. Grounded in both philosophy and practice, this approach enables researchers to identify what will be researched, how it will be researched, and why the research will be undertaken in their chosen way. Presented as a set of core principles and a conceptual framework, its practical application is illustrated through the authors' experience of mixing methods in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The synergistic approach discussed in this article offers researchers an alternative mixed methods research approach.
Baker, R., & Robinson, A. (2004). Responses to standard gambles: Are preferences ``well constructed''? Health Economics, 13, 37-48.
2.
Baum, F. (2002). The new public health. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
3.
Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Penguin Books.
4.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
Bosch, F., Lorincz, A., Munoz, N., Meijer, C., & Shah, K. (2000). The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 55, 244-265.
6.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Unwin Hyman.
8.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97-113.
9.
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 8-22.
10.
Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., Gutmann, M.L., & Hanson, W.E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-240). London: Sage.
14.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
15.
Dolan, P., & Gudex, C. (1995). Time preference, duration and health state valuations . Health Economics, 4, 289-299.
16.
Drummond, M., Sculpher, M., Torrance, G., O'Brien, B., & Stoddart, G. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
Friedman, M. (1962). Price theory. Chicago: Aldine.
18.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays . New York: Basic Books.
19.
Greene, J. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7-22.
20.
Greene, J., Benjamin, L., & Goodyear, L. (2001). The merits of mixing methods in evaluation. Evaluation, 7(1), 25-44.
21.
Greene, J.C., & Caracelli, V. (1997). Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed-method evaluation. In J. C. Greene & V. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 5-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Greene, J., & Caracelli, V. (2003). Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice . In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 91-110). London: Sage.
23.
Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V., & Graham, W.F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 11(3), 255-274.
24.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
25.
Kemper, E., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 273-296): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Maxwell, J., & Loomis, D. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach . In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 241-272): London: Sage.
28.
Morgan, D.L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362-376.
29.
Morse, J. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(1), 120-123.
30.
Morse, J.M. (1996). Is qualitative research complete? Qualitative Health Research, 6(1), 3-5.
31.
Morse, J.M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 189-208): London: Sage.
32.
Niglas, K. (2004). The combined use of qualitative and quantitative methods in educational research. Tallinn, Estonia: Tallinn Pedagogical UniversityDissertation in Social Sciences.
33.
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combinning quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375-387.
34.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation & research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
35.
Popay, J., & Williams, G. (1996). Public health research and lay knowledge. Social Science & Medicine, 42(5), 759-768.
36.
Popay, J., & Williams, G. (1998). Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare . Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 91(35), 32-37.
37.
Posney, T., & Vessey, M. (1988). Prevention of cervical cancer: The patient's view . London: King Edward's Hospital Fund for London.
38.
Robinson, A., Dolan, P., & Williams, A. (1997). Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: What lies behind the numbers? Social Science & Medicine, 45(8), 1289-1297.
39.
Robinson, A., Loomes, G., & Jones-Lee, M. (2001). Visual analog scales, standard gambles, and relative risk aversion. Medical Decision Making, 21, 17-27.
40.
San Miguel, F., Ryan, M., & Amaya-Amaya, M. (2005). ``Irrational'' stated preferences: A quantitative and qualitative investigation. Health Economics , 14, 307-322.
41.
Shulha, L.M., & Wilson, R.J. (2003). Collaborative mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 639-670): London: Sage.
42.
Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 50, 364-371.
43.
Smith, J.K., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Relativism, criteria and politics. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 915-932). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A. (Eds.). (2004). Concise Oxford English dictionary . New York: Oxford University Press .
45.
Solomon, D., Schiffman, M., & Tarone, R. (2001). Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Baseline results from a randomized trial. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 93(4), 293-299.
46.
Stange, K., Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (2006). Publishing multimethod research. Annals of Family Medicine, 4(4), 292-294.
47.
Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 332-382.
48.
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. (2008). Mixed methodology across disciplines. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 3-6.
49.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. London: Sage.
51.
Tedlock, B. (2000). Ethnography. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. London : Sage.
52.
Thurow, L. (1983). Dangerous currents: The state of economics. New York: Random House.
53.
Torrance, G. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. Journal of Health Economics, 5(1), 1-30.
54.
Tversky, A. (Ed.). (1996). Contrasting rational and psychological principles in choice. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.
55.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4, Pt. 2), S251-S278.
56.
Tversky, A., Sattah, S., & Slovic, P. (1988). Contingent weighting in judgement and choice. Psychological Review, 95(3), 317-384.
57.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
Walboomers, J., Jacobs, M.V., Manos, M.M., Bosch, F.X., Kummer, J.A., Shah, K.V., et al. (1999). Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. Journal of Pathology , 189, 12-19.
