This study uses a sequential transformative mixed methods research design to explain how political advertising fails to engage college students. Qualitative focus groups examined how college students interpret the value of political advertising to them, and a quantitative manifest content analysis concerning ad framing of more than 100 ads from the 2004 presidential race revealed why focus group participants felt so alienated by political advertising. By not selecting issues and people to which youth can relate, political advertising is framed to decrease the salience of young voters, thereby promoting an interpretation among college students that the messages within candidate ads are not relevant to them. Suggestions are made for building more engaging ads. The utility of this research design is also discussed in terms of its benefits for data analysis and validity.
Andsager, J.L.
,
Austin, E.W.
, &
Pinkleton, B.E.
(2001).
Questioning the value of realism: Young adults' processing of messages in alcohol-related public service announcements and advertising
. Journal of Communication, 51,
121-135
.
2.
Bennett, S.E.
(1997).
Why young Americans hate politics, and what we should do about it
. Political Science & Politics, 30,
47-54
.
3.
Bush, A.J.
,
Martin, C.A.
, &
Bush, V.D.
(2004).
Sports celebrity influence on the behavioral intentions of generation Y
. Journal of Advertising Research, 44,
108-118
.
4.
Carlin, D. B.
, &
M. S. McKinney.
(Eds.). (1994). The 1992 presidential debates in focus.
Westport, CT: Praeger
.
Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement (CIRCLE).
(2004 ). The youth vote in 2004. Retrieved May 12, 2005, from www.civicyouth.org
5.
Charmaz, K.
(2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In
N. K. Denzin
&
Y. S. Lincoln
(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-535).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
6.
Cline, T.W.
,
Altsech, M.B.
, &
Kellaris, J.J.
(2003).
When does humor enhance or inhibit ad responses? The moderating role of the need for humor
. Journal of Advertising, 32,
31-46
.
7.
Cook, G.
(1992). The discourse of advertising.
London: Routledge
.
8.
Creswell, J.W.
(2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
9.
Creswell, J.W.
,
Plano Clark, V.L.
,
Gutmann, M.L.
, &
Hanson, W.E.
(2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In
A. Tashakkori
&
C. Teddlie
(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-240).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
10.
Danaher, P.
(1995).
What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks?Journal of Advertising Research, 35,
37-48
.
11.
Degree of challenge. (2003, May 1). Ad Age. Retrieved May 12, 2005, from www.adage.com/news.cms?newsId=43997
12.
Delli Carpini, M.X.
, &
Williams, B.A.
(1994).
Methods, metaphors, and media research: The uses of television in political conversation
. Communication Research, 21,
782-812
.
13.
Dermody, J.
, &
Scullion, R.
(2001).
An exploration of the advertising ambitions and strategies of the 2001 British General Election
. Journal of Marketing Management, 17,
969-987
.
14.
Dermody, J.
, &
Scullion, R.
(2004).
Exploring the value of party political advertising for youth electoral engagement: An analysis of the 2001 British General Election advertising campaigns
. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9,
361-379
.
15.
Dreher, M.
(1994). Qualitative research methods from the reviewer's perspective. In
J. M. Morse
(Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 202-221).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
16.
Entman, R.M.
(1993).
Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
. Journal of Communication, 43,
51-58
.
17.
Gamson, W.A.
, &
Modigliani, A.
(1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In
R. G. Braungart
&
M. M. Braungart
(Eds.), Research in political sociology (Vol. 3, pp. 137-177).
Greenwich, CT: JAI
.
18.
Gans, H.
(1980). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time.
New York: Vintage Books
.
19.
Gilbert, T.
(2006).
Mixed methods and mixed methodologies. Journal of Research
in Nursing, 11,
205-217
.
20.
Graber, D.
(1984). Processing the news.
New York : Longman
.
21.
Highton, B.
, &
Wolfinger, R.E.
(2001).
The first seven years of the political life cycles
. American Journal of Political Science , 45,
202-209
.
22.
Holsti, O.R.
(1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities .
Reading, MA: Addison Wesley
.
23.
Hung, K.
(2001).
Framing meaning perceptions with music: The case of teaser ads
. Journal of Advertising, 30,
39-50
.
24.
Iyengar, S.
, &
Simon, A.F.
(2000).
New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annual Review ofPsychology, 51,
149-169
.
25.
Johnson-Cartee, K.
, &
Copeland, G.
(1997). Manipulation of the American voter: Political campaign commercials.
Westport, CT: Praeger
.
26.
Kahneman, D.
, &
Tversky, A.
(1984).
Choice, values, frames
. American Psychologist, 39,
341-350
.
27.
Lincoln, Y.S.
, &
Guba, E.G.
(1985). Naturalistic inquiry.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
.
28.
Lindlof, T.R.
(1995). Qualitative communication research methods.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
29.
Lunt, P.
, &
Livingstone, S.
(1996).
Rethinking the focus group in media and communication research
. Journal of Communication , 46,
79
.
30.
McKinney, M.S.
, &
Lamoureux, E.R.
(1999). Citizen response to the 1996 presidential debates: Focusing on the focus groups. In
L. L. Kaid
&
D. G. Bystrom
(Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (p. 1027).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
.
31.
Morgan, D.L.
(1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed., Qualitative Research Methods Series).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
32.
Morris, J.D.
,
Roberts, M.S.
, &
Baker, G.F.
(1999). Emotional responses of African-American voters to ad messages. In
L. L. Kaid
&
D. G. Bystrom
(Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 247-256).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
.
33.
Nelson, T.E.
,
Clawson, R.A.
, &
Oxley, Z.M.
(1997).
Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effects on tolerance
. American Political Science Review , 91,
567-583
.
34.
O'Donohoe, S.
(1997).
Raiding the postmodern pantry: Advertising intertextuality and the young adult audience
. European Journal of Marketing,31,
234-253
.
35.
Parker, B.J.
(1998).
Exploring life themes and myths in alcohol advertisements through a meaning-based model of advertising experiences
. Journal of Advertising, 27,
14-29
.
Patterson, T.E.
(2002). The vanishing voter.
New York : Knopf
.
38.
Pauly, J.J.
(1991). A beginner's guide to doing qualitative research in mass communication (Journalism Monograph No. 125).
Columbia, SC: Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication
.
39.
Pinkleton, B.E.
,
Um, N.H.
, &
Austin, E.W.
(2002).
An exploration of the effects of negative political advertising on political decision-making
. Journal of Advertising , 31,
13-26
.
40.
Price, V.
, &
Tewksbury, D.
(1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In
G. A. Barnett
&
F. J. Boster
(Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advanced in persuasion (pp. 173-212).
Greenwich, CT: Ablex
.
41.
Price, V.
,
Tewksbury, D.
, &
Powers, E.
(1997).
Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses
. Communication Research , 24,
481-506
.
42.
Reese, S.D.
(2001). Prologue—Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In
S. D. Reese
,
O. H. Gandy Jr.
, &
A. E. Grant
(Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7-31).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
.
43.
Richardson, G.
(2002). Pulp politics: How political advertising tells the stories of American politics.
Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
.
44.
Riffe, D.
,
Lacy, S.
, &
Fico, F.
(1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
.
45.
Scheufele, D.
(2000).
Agenda setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication
. Mass Communication & Society, 3,
297-316
.
46.
Scheufele, D.A.
(1999).
Framing as a theory of media effects
. Journal of Communication, 49,
103-122
.
47.
Schneider, P.
(1996, October).
Social barriers to voting
. Social Education, 60(6),
355-357
.
48.
Shen, F.
(2004).
Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements
. Journal of Communication, 54,
123-137
.
49.
Shen, F.
, &
Edwards, H.H.
(2005).
Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A values-based account of framing effects
. Journal of Communication, 55,
795-809
.
50.
U.S. Census Bureau.
(2004). Voting and registration. Retrieved May 12, 2005, from http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/voting.html
51.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
( 1999). The uninsured in the March 1998 Current Population Survey . Retrieved May 12, 2005, from http://www.ahrq.gov/research/mar01/301RA18.htm
52.
Valentino, N.A.
,
Hutchings, V.L.
, &
White, I.K.
(2002).
Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes
. American Political Science Review, 96,
75-90
.
