This paper uses a robust (order-m) DEA approach to evaluate the efficiency of Tour de France cycling teams. Since there are multiple ways this event can be successful for a cycling team, we take it that managers face strategic input decisions regarding team and rider characteristics. Specifically, we distinguish between ranking teams, sprint teams, and mixed teams, and compute for each team an efficiency score as due to the team's performance relative to similarly classified teams and an efficiency score that is the consequence of the team type. We find that ranking teams are generally more efficient than other types of cycling teams.
CazalsC., FlorensJ. P., & SimarL. (2002). Nonparametric frontier estimation: A robust approach.Journal of Econometrics, 106, 1–25.
2.
CharnesA., CooperW. W., & RhodesE. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
3.
CherchyeL., & VermeulenF. (2006). Robust rankings of multidimensional performances: An application to Tour de France racing cyclists.Journal of Sports Economics, 7, 359–373.
4.
CollierT., JohnsonA. L., & RuggieroJ. (2011). Measuring technical efficiency in sports.Journal of Sports Economics, 12, 579–598.
5.
CooperW. W., RuizJ. L., & SirventI. (2009). Selecting non-zero weights to evaluate effectiveness of basketball players with DEA.European Journal of Operational Research, 195, 563–574.
6.
DaraioC., & SimarL. (2007). Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis: Methodology and applications.Series: Studies in Productivity and Efficiency, Berlin, Germany: Springer.
7.
De WitteK., ThanassoulisE., SimpsonG., BattistiG., & Charlesworth-MayA. (2010). Assessing pupil and school performance by non-parametric and parametric techniques.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1224–1237.
8.
EinolfK. W. (2004). Is winning everything?: A data envelopment analysis of Major League Baseball and the National Football League.Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 127–151.
9.
Espitia-EscuerM., & Garcia-CebrianL. I. (2004). Measuring the efficiency of Spanish first-division soccer teams.Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 329–346.
10.
FarrellM. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, CXX, Part 3, 253–290.
11.
HaasD. J. (2003). Technical efficiency in the Major League Soccer.Journal of Sports Economics, 4, 203–215.
12.
HadleyL., PoitrasM., RuggieroJ., & KnowlesS. (2000). Performance evaluation of National Football League teams.Managerial and Decision Economics, 21, 63–70.
13.
Pestana BarrosC., & LeachS. (2006). Analyzing the performance of the English F. A. Premier League with an economic frontier model.Journal of Sports Economics, 7, 391–407.
14.
PrinzE. (2005). Every second counts: the influence of money and body weight in professional road racing—empirical evidence from the Tour de France.Working paper, University of Witten/Herdecke.
15.
RimlerM. S., SongS., & YiD. T. (2010). Estimating production efficiency in men's NCAA college basketball: BayesianA. approach. Journal of Sports Economics, 11, 287–315.
16.
SterkenE. (2005). Performance and competition in the Tour de France, Working paper. Department of Economics, University of Groningen.
17.
ThanassoulisE., & PortelaM. C. A. (2002). School outcomes: Sharing the responsibility between pupil and school.Education Economics, 10, 183–207.
18.
TorglerB. (2007). La Grande Boucle: Determinants of success at the Tour de France.Journal of Sports Economics, 8, 317–331.
19.
YangF., WuD. D., LiangL., & O'NeillL. (2011). Competition strategy and efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs.European Journal of Operational Research, 212, 560–569.
