This paper analyzes TV demand for cycling in Flanders. Using data for 338 Tour de France broadcasts, average and peak TV audience per stage is estimated by an OLS regression model. A first set of independent variables measures the importance of stage scheduling and includes variables that define the stage type and date, as determined by the race organizer. A second set of variables consists of stage features out of control of the race organizer. These variables measure the importance of outcome uncertainty, patriotism, doping, and substitute activities. Our findings suggest that TV viewership of cycling is largely determined by stage characteristics. On a much smaller scale are viewing habits driven by race developments. We also find evidence of a negative impact of the release of doping news on viewership. The study supports the idea that a wellchosen race profile is crucial to maximize Tour de France TV viewership.
AlavyK., GaskellA., LeachS., & SzymanskiS. (2010). On the edge of your seat: Demand for football on television and the uncertainty of outcome hypothesis.International Journal of Sports Finance, 5(2), 75–95.
2.
AllanG., & RoyG. (2008). Does television crowd out spectators—Evidence from the Scottish Premier League.Journal of Sports Economics, 9(6), 592–605.
3.
BaimbridgeM., CameronS., & DawsonP. (1995). Satellite broadcasting and match attendance: The case of rugby league.Applied Economic Letters, 2(10), 343–346.
4.
BaimbridgeM., CameronS., & DawsonP. (1996). Satellite television and the demand for football: A whole new ball game?Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 43(3), 317–333.
5.
BerkowitzJ., DepkenC. A., & WilsonD. P. (2010). Outcome uncertainty, attendance, and television audience in NASCAR. Working paper.
6.
BinerB. (2009). Equal strength or dominant teams: Policy analysis of NFL. Working paper, University of Minnesota.
7.
BuraimoB. (2008). Stadium attendance and television audience demand in English League Football.Managerial and Decision Economics, 29, 513–523.
8.
BuraimoB., & SimmonsR. (2009). A tale of two audiences: Spectators, television viewers and outcome uncertainty in Spanish football.Journal of Economics and Business, 61, 326–338.
9.
CarmichaelF., MillingtonJ., & SimmonsR. (1999). Elasticity of demand for Rugby League attendance and the impact of Bsky B.Applied Economics Letters, 6, 797–800.
10.
CzarnitzkiD., & StadtmannG. (2002). Uncertainty of outcome versus reputation: Empirical evidence for the first German Football Division.Empirical Economics, 27(1), 101–112.
11.
Di DomizioM. (2010). Competitive balance and TV audience: An empirical analysis of the Italian Serie A.Working paper 2010/64, University of Teramo.
12.
FeddersenA., & RottA. (2011). Determinants of demand for televised live football: Features of the German national football team.Journal of Sports Economics, 12(3), 352–369.
13.
FinkJ. S., & ParkerH. M. (2009). Spectator motives: Why do we watch when our favorite team is not playing?Sport Marketing Quarterly, 18(4), 210–217.
14.
FizelJ. L., & BennettR. W. (1989). The impact of college football telecasts on college football attendance.Social Science Quarterly, 70(4), 980–988.
15.
ForrestD., SimmonsR., & BuraimoB. (2005). Outcome uncertainty and the couch potato audience.Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(4), 641–661.
16.
ForrestD., SimmonsR., & SzymanskiS. (2004). Broadcasting, attendance and the inefficiency of cartels.Review of Industrial Organization, 24, 243–265.
17.
GarciaJ., & RodriguezP. (2006). The determinants of TV audience for Spanish football: A first approach. In RodriguezP., KésenneS., & GarciaJ. (Eds.), Sports economics after fifty years: Essays in honour of Simon Rottenberg. Universidad de Oviedo, 147–168.
18.
GarciaJ., & RodriguezP. (2009). Sports attendance: A survey of the literature 1973-2007.Rivista di Diritto ed Economio dello Sport, 5(2), 111–151.
19.
Initiative, futures sport + entertainment (2010). ViewerTrack Report 2010 (the most watched TV sporting events of 2009). Retrieved from http://www.futuressport.com
20.
IP & RTL Group (2011). Television 2011, International Key Facts. Luxembourg.
21.
JohnsenH., & SolvollM. (2007). The demand for televised football.European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(4), 311–335.
22.
KaempferW. H., & PaceyP. L. (1986). Televising college football: The complementarity of attendance and viewing.Social Science Quarterly, 67(1), 176–85.
23.
KuypersT. (1996). The beautiful game? An econometric study of why people watch football. Discussion paper in economics 96/01, University College London.
24.
NüeschS., & FranckE. (2009). The role of patriotism in explaining the TV audience of national team games—Evidence from four international tournaments.Journal of Media Economics, 22(6), 6–19.
25.
PaceyP. L., & WickhamE. D. (1985). College football telecasts: Where are they going?Economic Inquiry, 23, 93–113.
26.
PutsisW., & SenS. (2000). Should NFL blackouts be banned.Applied Economics, 32(12), 1495–1507.
27.
SolbergH. A., & HammervoldR. (2008). TV sports viewers—Who are they? Norwegian A. case study.Nordicom Review, 29(1), 95–110.
28.
SportBusiness Intelligence (2011). Battle for yellow jersey brings climbing audiences for the Tour de France.Watching Brief, 15, 2–3.
29.
ThompsonC. S. (2008). The Tour de France: A cultural history. University of California.
30.
ZhangJ. J., & SmithD. W. (1997). Impact of broadcasting on the attendance of professional basketball games.Sport Marketing Quarterly, 6(1), 23–28.
