The current study examined the psychometric properties of the abbreviated versions, 55- and 22-items, of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory (CMNI). The authors tested the factor structure for the 11 subscales of the CMNI-55 and the global masculinity factor for the CMNI-55 and the CMNI-22. In a clinical sample of men and women (n = 522), the results supported the 11-factor model. Furthermore, the factor structure was invariant for men and women. The higher order model, which tested the utility of the global masculine score, demonstrated marginal fit. The factor structures for the global masculinity score for the CMNI-22 demonstrated poor fit. Collectively, the results suggest that the CMNI-55 is better represented in a multidimensional construct. The subscales’ alpha levels and factor loadings were, generally, within acceptable limits. Gender and ethnic mean level differences are also reported.
Addis, M.E., & Mahalik, J.R. ( 2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help-seeking. American Psychologist, 58, 5-14.
2.
Brannon, R., & Juni, S. ( 1984). A scale for measuring attitudes toward masculinity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 14, 6.
3.
Burns, S.M., & Mahalik, J.R. ( 2006). Physical health, self-reliance, and emotional control as moderators of the relationship between locus of control and mental health among men treated for prostate cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 561-572.
4.
Burns, S.M., & Mahalik, J.R. ( 2007). Understanding how masculine gender scripts may contribute to men’s adjustment following treatment for prostate cancer. American Journal of Men’s Health, 1, 205-261.
5.
Burn, S.M., & Ward, Z. ( 2005). Men’s conformity to traditional masculinity and relationship satisfaction. Psychology of Men and Masculinity , 6, 254-263.
6.
Clark, L.A., & Watson, D. ( 1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319.
7.
Heubeck, B.G., & Neill, J.T. ( 2000). Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability of the mental health inventory for Australian adolescents. Psychological Reports, 87, 431-440.
8.
Kenny, D.A., & McCoach, D.B. ( 2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling , 10, 333-351.
9.
Kline, R.B. ( 1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling . New York: Guilford Press.
10.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
11.
Lee, S., & Hershberger, S. (1990). A simple rule for generating equivalent models in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 313-334.
12.
Levant, R.F., & Richmond, K. ( 2007). A review of research on masculinity ideologies using the Male Role Norms Inventory. Journal of Men’s Studies , 15, 130-146.
13.
Levant, R.F., Smalley, K.B., Aupont, M., House, A.T., Richmond, K., & Noronha, D. ( 2007). Initial validation of the male role norms inventory-revised (MRNI-R). Journal of Men’s Studies, 15, 83-100.
14.
Liu, W.M., & Iwamoto, D.K. ( 2007). Conformity to masculine norms, Asian values, coping strategies, peer group influences, and substance use among AsianAmerican men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 8, 25-39.
15.
Locke, B.D., & Mahalik, J.R. ( 2005). Examining masculinity norms, problem drinking, and athletic involvement as predictors of sexual aggression in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 279-283.
16.
Mahalik, J.R., Good, G.E., & Englar-Carlson, M. (2003). Masculinity scripts, presenting concerns and help-seeking: Implications for practice and training . Professional Psychology: Theory, Research and Practice, 34, 123-131.
17.
Mahalik, J.R., Levi-Minzi, M., & Walker, G. ( 2007). Masculinity and health behaviors inAustralian men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 240-249.
18.
Mahalik, J.R., Locke, B.D., Ludlow, L.H., Diemer, M., Scott, R.P.J., Gottfried, M., et al. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 3-25.
19.
Mahalik, J.R., Perry, J.C., Coonerty-Femiano, A., Catraio, C., & Land, L.N. ( 2006). Examining conformity to male norms as a function of RIASEC vocational interests. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 203-213.
20.
Mahalik, J.R., & Rochlen, A.B. ( 2006). Men’s likely responses to clinical depression: What are they and do masculinity norms predict them? Sex Roles , 55, 659-667.
21.
Mahalik, J.R., Talmadge, W.T., Locke, B.D., & Scott, R.P.J. ( 2005). Using the conformity to masculine norms inventory to work with men in a clinical setting. Journal of Clinical Psychology , 61, 661-674.
22.
Northey, W.F. ( 2005). Studying marriage and family therapists in the 21st century: Methodological and technological issues. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 31, 99-106.
23.
O’Neil, J.M. ( 2008). Summary of normative data for the Gender Role Conflict Scale. Retrieved April 18, 2008, from http://web.uconn.edu/joneil/NormativeData.pdf
24.
O’Neil, J.M., Good, G.E., & Holmes, S. ( 1995). Fifteen years of theory and research on men’s gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research. In R. R. Levant & W. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 164-206). New York: Basic Books.
25.
Owen, J., Stratton, J., & Rodolfa, E. ( 2009). Clients’ emotional control and cathartic responses in short term therapy. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26.
Owen, J., Stratton, J., & Rodolfa, E. ( 2007). Men and therapy: Conformity to male norms and therapy outcome and process. Poster presented at the American Psychological Association Meeting, San Francisco.
27.
Owen, J., Wong, J.Y., & Rodolfa, E.R. ( 2009). Empirical search for psychotherapists’ gender competence in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 46, 448-458.
28.
Owen, J., Wong, J.Y., & Rodolfa, E.R. ( 2010). The relationship between clients’ conformity to masculine norms and their perceptions of helpful therapist actions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 68-78.
29.
Quintana, S.M., Troyano, N., & Taylor, G. ( 2001). Cultural validity and inherent challenges in quantitative methods for multicultural research. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (2nd ed., pp. 604-630). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Rochlen, A.B., McKelley, R.A., Suizzo, M.A., & Scaringi, V. ( 2008). Predictors of relationship satisfaction, psychological well-being, and life satisfaction among stay-at-home fathers. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 9, 17-28.
31.
Sabourin, S., Valois, P., & Lussier, Y. ( 2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17, 15-27.
32.
Smiler, A.P. ( 2004). Thirty year after the discovery of gender: Psychological concepts and measures of masculinity. Sex Roles, 50, 15-26.
33.
Thompson, E.H., & Pleck, J.H. ( 1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531-543.
34.
Thompson, E.H., & Pleck, J.H. ( 1995). Masculine ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), The new psychology of men (pp. 129-163). New York: Basic Books.
35.
Whorley, M., & Addis, M.E. ( 2006). Ten years of research on the psychology of men and masculinity in the United States: Methodological trends and critique. Sex Roles, 55, 649-658.
36.
Wu, R., Levant, R.F., & Sellers, A. ( 2001). The influence of sex and social development on masculinity ideology of Chinese undergraduate students. Psychological Science, 24, 365-366.
37.
Zamarripa, M.X., Wampold, B.E., & Gregory, E. ( 2003). Male gender role conflict, depression, and anxiety: Clarification and generalizability to women. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 50, 333-338.
38.
Zientek, L.R., & Thompson, B. ( 2007). Applying the bootstrap to the multivariate case: Bootstrap component/factor analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 318-325.
