This chapter investigates driver distraction, a pressing road safety issue. First, research findings regarding the demands placed on drivers by the primary driving tasks and various non-driving-related secondary tasks are reviewed. Second, promising theories and models are reviewed for characterizing how driver distraction is caused and how it affects the driving task. Third, a review is provided of current investigation and measurement methods used in distraction research, guidelines, standards, antidistraction devices, and antidistraction legislation. Fourth, the most important implications from this review are summarized for the various stakeholders in the driver distraction debate. And finally, some important issues for future research into driver distraction are discussed, as is the importance of considering driver distraction in the context of an integrated safety vision.
AckermanP. L.SchneiderW.WickensC. D. (1984). Deciding the existence of a time-sharing ability: A combined methodological and theoretical approach. Human Factors, 26, 71–82.
4.
AllenR. W.McRuerD. (1979). The man/machine control interface: Pursuit control. Automatica, 15, 683–686.
5.
AltmannE. M.TraftonJ. G. (2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26, 39–83.
6.
AndersonJ.LebiereC. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
AngellL.AuflickJ.AustriaP. A.KochharD.TijerinaL.BieverW.KigerS. (2006). Driver workload metrics task 2 final report and appendices(DOT HS 810 635). Final research report. Washington, DC: National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
8.
AngellL. S.PerezM.HankeyJ. (2008, August). Driver usage patterns for secondary information systems. Paper for The First Human Factors Symposium on Naturalistic Driving Methods and Analyses, Blacksburg, VA.
9.
AngellL. S.YoungR. A.HankeyJ. M.DingusT. A. (2002). An evaluation of alternative methods for assessing driver workload in the early development of in-vehicle information systems (SAE Tech. Rep. No. 2002-01-1981). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Manufacturers.
10.
BaddeleyA. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.
11.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. J. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
12.
BallK.OwsleyC. (1993). The useful field of view test: A new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 64, 71–79.
13.
BallK.RoenkerD.BruniJ. (1990). Developmental changes in attention and visual search throughout adulthood. In EnnsJ. (Ed.), The development of attention: Research and theory (pp. 489–508). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
14.
BeijerD.SmileyA.EizenmanM. (2004). Observed driver glance behavior at roadside advertising signs. Transportation Research Record, 1899, 96–103.
15.
BlancoM.BocanegraJ. L.MorganJ. F.FitchG. M.MedinaOlsonR. L.ZimmermannR. P. (2009). Assessment of a drowsy driver warning system for heavy vehicle drivers: Final report (Report No. DOT HS 811 117). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
16.
BlancoM.HickmanJ. S.OlsonR. L.BocanegraJ. L.HanowskiR. J.NakataA.BowmanD. (in press). Investigating critical incidents, driver restart period, sleep quantity, and crash countermeasures in commercial operations using naturalistic data collection: Final report (Contract No. DTFH61-01-C-00049, Task Order No. 23). Washington, DC: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
17.
BowyerS. M.HsiehL.MoranJ. E.YoungR. A.ManoharanA.LiaoTepleyN. (2009). Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene using MEG. Brain Research, 1251, 151–161.
18.
BrachR. M.BrachM. (2005). Vehicle accident analysis and reconstruction methods. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers International.
19.
BühnerM.KönigC.PickM.KrummS. (2006). Working memory dimensions as differential predictors of the speed and error aspect of multitasking performance. Human Performance, 19, 253–275.
20.
CadesD.TraftonJ. G.Boehm-DavisD. A. (2006) Mitigating disruptions: Can resuming an interrupted task be trained?In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 368–371). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
21.
CairdJ. K.WillnessC.SteelP.ScialfaC. (2008). A meta-analysis of cell phone use on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 1282–1293.
22.
CarpenterS. (2002). Sights unseen. APA Monitor, 32, 54–57.
23.
ClarkH. H.BrennanS. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In ResnickL. B.LevineJ. M.TeasleyJ. S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
Commission of the European Communities (2007). Safe and efficient in-vehicle information and communication systems: Update of the European Statement of Principles on human machine interface. Office Journal of the European Union, L 32, 200–241.
25.
ComptonR. P.Ellison-PotterP. (2008). Teen driver crashes: A report to Congress (Report No. DOT HS 811 005). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
26.
ConwayA. R. A.KaneM. J.BuntingM. F.HambrickD. Z.WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.
27.
CooperJ. M.StrayerD. L. (2008). Effects of simulator practice and real-world experience on cell-phone-related driver distraction. Human Factors, 50, 893–902.
CowanN. (1997). The development of working memory. In CowanN. (Ed.), The development of memory in childhood (pp. 163–200). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
30.
CowanN. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
CrundallD.Van LoonE.UnderwoodG. (2006). Attraction and distraction of attention with roadside advertisements. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38, 671–677.
32.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
33.
DeLuciaP. R.MatherR. D. (2006). Motion extrapolation of car-following scenes in younger and older drivers. Human Factors, 48, 666–674.
34.
DeLuciaP. R.TharanathanA. (2009). Responses to deceleration during car following: Roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations and interruptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 334–350.
35.
DesimoneR.DuncanJ. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
36.
DingusT. (2009, September). Crash/near crash risk associated with non-driving-task induced driver distraction. Paper presented at First National Distracted Driving Summit, Washington, DC.
37.
DingusT. A.KlauerS. G. (2008). The relative risks of secondary task induced driver distraction (Technical Paper Series 2008-21-0001). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
38.
DingusT. A.KlauerS. G.NealeV. L.PetersenA.LeeS. E.SudweeksJ.KniplingR. R. (2006). The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study: Phase II. Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment (Report No. DOT HS 810 593). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
39.
DonmezB.BoyleL. N.LeeJ. D. (2006). The impact of distraction mitigation strategies on driving performance. Human Factors, 48, 785–804.
40.
DonmezB.BoyleL. N.LeeJ. D. (2009). Designing feedback to mitigate distraction. In ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 519–532). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
41.
DonmezB.BoyleL. N.LeeJ. D.McGeheeD. M. (2006). Drivers’ attitudes toward imperfect distraction mitigation strategies. Transportation Research Part F, 9, 387–398.
Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group. (2006). Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems. Washington, DC: Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.
DuncanJ.WilliamsP.Nimmo-SmithI.BrownI. D. (1992). The control of skilled behavior: Learning, intelligence and distraction. In MeyerD. E.KornblumS. (eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 323–342). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46.
ElliottM. R.ArbogastK. B.MenonR.DurbinD. R.WinstonF. K. (2003). Accuracy of self-reported data for estimating crash severity. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35, 833–840.
47.
EndsleyM. R. (2004). Situation awareness: progress and directions. In BanburyS.TremblayS. (Eds.), A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory, measurement, and application (pp. 317–341). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
48.
EndsleyM. R.GarlandD. J. (2000). Situation awareness and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
EngleR. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.
50.
EngleR. W.KaneM. J.TuholskiS. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenances and executive control (pp. 102–134). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
EngströmJ.ÄbergN.JohanssonE.HammarbäckJ. (2005). Comparison between visual and tactile signal detection tasks applied to the safety assessment of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS). In LopesT. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 232–239). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
52.
EngströmJ.JohanssonE.OstlundJ. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behavior, 8, 97–120.
53.
EngströmJ.VictorT. W. (2009). Real-time distraction countermeasures. In ReganM.LeeJ. D.YoungK. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects and mitigation (pp. 465–484). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
54.
EricssonK. A.KintschW. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.
55.
EsbjörnssonM.JuhlinO.WeilenmannA. (2007). Drivers using mobile phones in traffic: An ethnographic study of interactional adaptation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 37–58.
56.
FarmerC. M. (2003). Reliability of police-reported information for determining crash and injury severity. Traffic Injury Prevention, 4, 38–44.
57.
FarmerC. M.KirleyB. B.McCarttA. T. (2010). Effects of in-vehicle monitoring on the driving behavior of teenagers. Journal of Safety Research, 41, 39–45.
58.
FisherD. L.PollatsekA. (2007). Novice driver crashes: Failure to divide attention or failure to recognize risks. In KramerA. F.WiegmannD.KirlikA. (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 134–153). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59.
FisherD. L.PollatsekA. P.PradhanA. (2006). Can novice drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their likelihood of a crash?Injury Prevention, 12, i25–i29.
60.
GopherD. (2007). Emphasis change as a training protocol for high demands tasks. In KramerA.WiegmanD.KirlikA. (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 209–224). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
GopherD.WeilM.SiegelD. (1989). Practice under changing priorities: An approach to training of complex skills. Acta Psychologica, 71, 147–179.
62.
GordonC. P. (2009). Crash studies of driver distraction. In M. A.ReganJ. D.LeeK. L.Young (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 281–304). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
63.
GreenP. (1999). The 15-second rule for driver information systems. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America Ninth Annual Meeting [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Intelligent Transportation Society of America, CD-ROM.
64.
GreenP. (2008). Driver interface/HMI standards to minimize driver distraction/overload (SAE Technical Paper Series, 2008-21-0002). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers International.
65.
GroegerJ. A. (2000). Understanding driving: Applying cognitive psychology to a complex everyday task. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
66.
HahnR. W.PriegerJ. E. (2007). The impact of driver cell phone use on accidents. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. Available from http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/
67.
HancockP. A.LeschM.SimmonsL. (2003). The distraction effects of phone use during crucial driving maneuvers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35, 501–514.
68.
HanowskiR.OlsonR.BocanegraJ. (2009, June). Driver distraction in commercial vehicle operations. Webinar, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
69.
HanowskiR. J.PerezM. A.DingusT. A. (2005). Driver distraction in long-haul drivers. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 441–458.
70.
HarmsL.PattenC. (2003). Peripheral detection as a measure of driver distraction. A study of memory-based versus system-based navigation in a built-up area. Transportation Research Part F, 6, 23–36.
71.
HoedemaekerD. M.HogemaJ. H.PauwulussenJ. J. A. (2006). Rijsimulatorstudie naar het effect van omgevingscomplexiteit op de werkbelasting [Driving simulator study into effect of environmental complexity on workload] (Tech. Rep. TNO-DV 2006 C244). Soesterberg, Netherlands: TNO-DV.
72.
HorreyW. J.LeschM. F.GarabetA. (2008). Assessing the awareness of performance decrements in distracted drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 675–682.
73.
HorreyW. J.LeschM. F.KramerA. F.MeltonD. F. (2009). Effects of a computer-based training module on drivers’ willingness to engage in distracting activities. Human Factors, 51, 571–581.
74.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D. (2003). Multiple resources modelling of task interference in vehicle control, hazard awareness and in-vehicle task performance. In Proceedings of the Second International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 7–12). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
75.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D. (2006). Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48, 196–205.
76.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D.ConsalusK. P. (2006). Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 67–78.
77.
HsiehL.YoungR. A.BowyerS. M.MoranJ. E.GenikR. J.II.GreenC. C.SeamanS. (2009). Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving video: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1251, 162–175.
78.
HurtsK. (2011). Driver distraction, crosstalk, and spatial reasoning. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2011.02.003
79.
HurtsC. M. M.SjardinB. (2009, August). Driver distraction, secondary visual task load, and attention-related abilities. Paper presented at the 9th International Congress of Physiological Anthropology, Delft, Netherlands.
80.
International Standards Organization. (2002). Road vehicles—Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems—Specifications and compliance procedures for in-vehicle visual presentation. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
81.
International Standards Organization. (2004). Road vehicles—Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems (TICS)—Procedures for determining priority of on-board messages presented to drivers. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
82.
International Standards Organization. (2007). Road vehicles—Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems—Occlusion method to assess visual demand due to the use of in-vehicle systems (International Standard No. ISO 16673). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
83.
International Standards Organization (2010). Road vehicles—Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems—Simulated lane change test to assess in-vehicle secondary task demand (ISO 26022:2010). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
84.
JacobsonP. D.GostinL. O. (2010). Reducing distracted driving: Regulation and education to avert traffic injuries and fatalities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303, 1419–1420.
85.
JanssenW. H. (1979). Routeplanning en geleiding: Een literatuurstudie [Route planning and guidance: A literature review] (Report IZF 1979 C-13). Soesterberg, Netherlands: Institute for Perception TNO.
86.
JonidesJ.YantisS. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 346–354.
87.
JuliussenE. (2009, April). The state of the connected vehicle market. Presentation given to the Connected Vehicles Summit, Detroit, MI.
88.
KlauerS. G.DingusT. A.NealeV. L.SudweeksJ. D.RamseyD. J. (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study data (USDOT Report No: DOT HS 810 594). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
89.
KlauerS. G.GuoF.SudweeksJ.DingusT. A. (2010). An analysis of driver inattention using a case-crossover approach on 100-Car data: Final report(DTNH22-00-C-07007) (US DOT HS 811 334). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
90.
KlauerS. G.SudweeksJ.HickmanJ. S.NealeV. L. (2006). How risky is it? An assessment of the relative risk of engaging in potentially unsafe driving behaviors. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
91.
KoppelS.CharltonJ. L.FildesB. (2009). Distraction and the older driver. In ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 353–382). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
92.
LairdJ. E.RosenbloomP. S.NewellA. (1987). Soar: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1–64.
93.
LavieN.RoT.RussellC. (2003). The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces. Psychological Science, 14, 510–515.
94.
LeeJ. D. (2007). Technology and teen drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 203–213.
95.
LeeJ. D.ReganM. A.YoungK. L. (2009). What drives distraction? Distraction as a breakdown of multilevel control. In ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 41–56). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
96.
LeeS. E.KlauerS. G.OlsenE. C. B.Simons-MortonB. G.DingusT. A.RamseyD. J.OuimetM. C. (in press). Detection of road hazards by novice teen and experienced adult drivers. Transportation Research Board Record.
97.
LernerN.BoydS. (2005). On-road study of willingness to engage in distracting tasks (Report No. DOT HS 809 863). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
98.
LernerN.SingerJ. P.HueyR. (2008). Driver strategies for engaging in distracting tasks using in-vehicle technologies. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
99.
LiangY.LeeJ. D.ReyesM. L. (2007). Nonintrusive detection of driver cognitive distraction in real time using Bayesian networks. Transportation Research Record, 2018, 1–8.
100.
MartensM. H.van WinsumW. (2000). Measuring distraction: The peripheral detection task. In Proceedings of the NHTSA Internet Forum on the Safety Impact of Driver Distraction When Using In-Vehicle Technology. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
101.
MattesS. (2003). The lane-change-task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. In StrasserH.KluthK.RauschH.BubbH. (Eds.), Quality of work and products in enterprises of the future (pp. 57–60). Stuttgart, Germany: Ergonomia.
102.
MattesS.FöhlU.SchindhelmR. (2007). Empirical comparison of method for off-line workload measurement (AIDE Deliverable 2.2.7, EU Project IST-1-507674-IP). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
103.
MatthewsG.DaviesD. R. (2001). Individual differences in energetic arousal and sustained attention: A dual-task study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 575–589.
104.
MayserC.PiechullaW.WeissK.-E.KönigW. (2003). Driver workload monitoring. In StrasserH.KluthK.RauschH.BubbH. (Eds.). Quality of Work and Products in Enterprises of the Future. Proceedings of the 50th Anniversary Conference of the GfA and the XVII Annual ISOES Conference in Munich, May 07th-09th, 2003 (pp. 41–44 ). Stuttgart: Ergonomia.
105.
McCarttA. T.HellingaL. A. (2007). Longer-term effects of Washington, DC, law on drivers’ hand-held cell phone use. Traffic Injury Prevention, 8, 199–204.
106.
McCarttA. T.HellingaL. A.BraitmanK. A. (2006). Cell phones and driving: Review of research. Traffic Injury Prevention, 7, 89–106.
107.
McCarttA. T.HellingaL. A.StrouseL. M.FarmerC. M. (2010). Long-term effects of handheld cell phone laws on driver handheld cell phone use. Traffic Injury Prevention, 11, 133–141.
108.
McEvoyS. P.StevensonM. R.McCarttA. T.WoodwardM.HaworthC.PalamaraP.CercarelliR. (2005). Role of mobile phone crashes resulting in hospital attendance: A case-crossover study. British Medical Journal, 331(7514), 428.
109.
McGeheeD. V.RabyM.CarneyC.LeeJ. D.ReyesM. L. (2007). Extending parental mentoring using an event-triggered video intervention in rural teen drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 215–227.
110.
MichonJ. A. (1971). Psychonomie onderweg [Psychonomics on its way]. Inaugural lecture. Groningen, Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
111.
MichonJ. A. (1979). Dealing with danger: Report of the European Commission MRC Workshop on physiological and psychological factors in performance under hazardous conditions (Report VK 79-01). Haren, Netherlands: Traffic Research Center, University of Groningen.
112.
MichonJ. A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models. In EvansL.SchwingR. C. (Eds.), Human behavior and traffic safety (pp. 485–520). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
113.
MonsellS. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.
114.
MorayN. (1986). Monitoring behavior and supervisory control. In BoffK. R.KaufmanL.ThomasJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 40.1–40.51). New York, NY: Wiley.
National Safety Council. (2010). Understanding the distracted brain: Why driving while using hands-free cell phones is risky behavior (White paper). Itasca, IL: Author.
117.
NavonD.MillerJ. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 435–448.
118.
NealeV. L.DingusT. A.KlauerS. G.SudweeksJ. D.GoodmanM. J. (2005). An overview of the 100-Car naturalistic study and findings (Paper 05-0400). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
119.
NormanD. A.ShalliceT. (1980). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In DavidsonR. J.SchwartzG. E.ShapiroD. (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
120.
OwsleyC.BallK.McGwinG.SloaneM. E.RoenkerD. L.WhiteM. F.OverleyE. T. (1998). Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1083–1088.
121.
PashlerH. E.JohnstonJ. C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. In PashlerH. E. (Ed.), Attention (pp. 155–189). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
122.
PerezM. A.KieferR. J.HaskinsA.HankeyJ. M. (2009). Evaluation of forward collision warning system visual alert candidates and SAE J2400. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 2, 750–764.
123.
PetitC.ClarionA.RamonC.ColletC. (2009). Evaluating the distractive power of secondary tasks while driving. In de WaardD.GodthelpJ.KooiF.BrookhuisK. (Eds.), Human Factors, Security and Safety (pp. 261–270). Maastricht, Netherlands: Shaker.
124.
PosnerM. I.PetersonS. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.
125.
PriegerJ. E.HahnR. W. (2007). Are drivers who use cell phones inherently less safe? (AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper No. 07-10). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=989808
126.
PringleH. L.IrwinD. E.KramerA. F.AtchleyP. (2001). The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 89–95.
127.
RakauskasM. E.WardN. J.BoerE. R.BernatE. M.CadwalladerM.PatrickC. J. (2008). Combined effects of alcohol and distraction on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 1742–1749.
128.
RakauskasM. E.WardN. J.GerberichG. (2009). Identification of differences between rural and urban safety cultures. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41, 931–937.
129.
RasmussenJ. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13, 257–266.
130.
RauchN.GradeneggerB.KrugerH. P. (2009). Is it possible or not? Situation awareness in using secondary tasks while driving. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 63, 3–15.
131.
ReasonJ. (1990). Human error. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
132.
RedelmeierD. A.TibshiraniR. J. (1997). Is using a car phone like driving drunk?Chance, 10, 5–9.
133.
ReganM. D.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.). (2009). Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
134.
ReganM. D.YoungK. L.LeeJ. D.GordonC. P. (2009). Sources of driver distraction. In ReganM. D.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp 249–270). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
135.
RensinkR. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 11, 245–277.
136.
RiquelmeH. E.Al-SammakF. S.RiosR. E. (2010). Social influences among young drivers on talking on the mobile phone while driving. Traffic Injury Prevention, 11, 127–132.
137.
RockwellT. H. (1972). Skills, judgment, and information acquisition in highway traffic safety research. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.
138.
RoettingM.HuangY. H.McDevittJ. R.MeltonD. (2003). When technology tells you how you drive: Truck drivers’ attitudes towards feedback by technology. Transportation Research Part F, 6, 275–287.
139.
RosenblattP. C. (2004). Grieving while driving. Death Studies, 28, 679–686.
140.
RuppG. L. (Ed.). (2010). Performance metrics for assessing driver distraction: The quest for improved road safety. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers International.
141.
SalvucciD. D. (2001a). An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 201–220.
142.
SalvucciD. D. (2001b). Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: An integrated model approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 85–107.
143.
SalvucciD. D.BoerE. R.LiuA. (2001). Toward an integrated model of driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Transportation Research Record, 1779, 9–16.
144.
SalvucciD. D.KushleyevaY.LeeF. J. (2004). Toward an ACT-R general executive for human multitasking. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 267–272). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
145.
SalvucciD. D.TaatgenN. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115, 101–130.
146.
SarnoK. J.WickensC. D. (1995). The role of multiple resources in predicting time-sharing efficiency: An evaluation of three workload models in a multiple task setting. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 107–130.
147.
SayerJ.FlannaganC. A. (2011, January). An evidence-based assessment of crash risk and the use of cell phones while driving. Paper presented at SAE 2011: Government/Industry Meeting, Driver Distraction Session G205, Washington, DC.
148.
SendersJ. W.FisherD. F.MontyR. A. (Eds.). (1978). Eye movements and the higher psychological functions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
149.
ShahP.MiyakeA. (1999). Models of working memory. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 1–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
150.
ShalliceT. (1982). Specific impairments in planning. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, B29, 199–209.
151.
SheridanT. (1970). On how often the supervisor should sample. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, SSC-6, 140–145.
152.
ShiffrinR. M.SchneiderW. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
153.
ShinarD.MeirM.Ben-ShohamI. (1998). How automatic is manual gear shifting?Human Factors, 40, 647–654.
154.
ShutkoJ.MayerK.LaansooE.TijerinaL. (2009). Driver workload effects of cell phone, music player, and text messaging tasks with the Sync voice interface versus the devices’ handheld visual-manual interfaces (SAE Paper No. 2009-01-0786). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
155.
SimonsD. J.ChabrisC. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.
156.
Society of Automotive Engineers. (2000). Definitions and experimental measures related to the specification of driver visual behavior using video based techniques (J2396). Warrendate, PA, Author.
157.
Society of Automotive Engineers. (2003). advanced driver interface systems for commercial vehicle operations (J2571). Warrendate, PA: Author.
158.
Society of Automotive Engineers. (2004a). Calculation of the time to complete in-vehicle navigation and route guidance tasks (J2365). Warrendate, PA: Author.
159.
Society of Automotive Engineers. (2004b). Navigation and route guidance function accessibility while driving (J2364). Warrendate, PA: Author.
160.
SrinivasanR.JovanisP. P. (1997). Effect of in-vehicle route guidance systems on driver workload and choice of vehicle speed: findings from a driving simulator experiment. In NoyY. I. (Ed.), Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces (pp. 303–308). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
161.
SternbergS. (1969). Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421–457.
162.
StrayerD.DrewsF.CrouchD. (2003). Fatal distraction? A comparison of the cell-phone driver and the drunk driver. In Proceedings of the Second International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 25–30). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
163.
StrayerD. L.JohnstonW. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular phone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.
164.
StuttsJ. C.ReinfurtD. W.StaplinL.RodgmanE. A. (2001). The role of driver distraction in crashes. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Retrieved from http://www.aaafoundation.org
165.
TheeuwesJ. (1996). Visual search at intersections: An eye-movement analysis. In GaleA. G.BrownI. D.HaslegraveC. M.TaylorS. P. (Eds.), Vision in vehicles V (pp. 125–134). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
166.
TheeuwesJ. (2001). The effects of road design on driving. In BarjonetP. (Ed.), Traffic psychology today (pp. 181–206). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
167.
TijerinaL.AngellL.AustriaA.TanA.KochharD. (2003). Driver workload metrics: Literature review. Task 1. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
168.
TraftonJ. G.AltmannE. M.BrockD. P.MintzF. E. (2003). Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 58, 583–603.
169.
TraftonG. J.MonkC. A. (2007). Task interruptions. In Boehm-DavisD. A. (Ed.), Reviews of human factors and ergonomics (Vol. 3, pp. 111–126). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
170.
Transportation Research Board. (2010). Second Safety Highway Research Program Naturalistic Driving Study. Retrieved from http://www.trb.org/SHRP2
171.
TsimhoniO.LiuY. (2003). Modeling steering using the Queuing Network–Model Human Processor (QN-MHP). In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 1875–1879). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
172.
TsimhoniO.SmithD.GreenP. (2004). Address entry while driving: Speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard. Human Factors, 46, 600–610.
173.
U.S. Department of Transportation. (2009). Traffic safety facts: Driver electronic device use in 2008 (DOT HS 811 184). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
174.
van der HorstR.MartensM. H. (2010). Peripheral detection task (PDT): Several examples of on-line measurement of driver cognitive workload [Monograph]. Driver performance metrics: Object and event detection. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
175.
van WinsumW.MartensM.HerlandL. (1999). The effects of speech versus tactile driver support messages on workload, driver behavior and user acceptance (TNO-Report TM-99-C043). Soesterberg, Netherlands: TNO.
176.
VerschuurW. L. G.HurtsK. (2008). Modeling safe and unsafe driving behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 644–656.
177.
VerweyW. B. (1991). Towards guidelines for in-care information management: driver workload in specific driving situations (Report IZF 1991 C-13). Soesterberg, Netherlands: Institute of Perception.
178.
VictorT. (2005). Keeping eye and mind on the road. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations From the Faculty of Social Sciences, 9. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala, Sweden.
179.
VictorT.EngströmJ.HarblukJ. L. (2009). Distraction assessment methods based on visual behavior and event detection. In ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 135–168). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
180.
VictorT.HarblukJ. L.EngströmJ. A. (2005). Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 167–190.
181.
Virginia Tech Transportation Institute. (2009, July28). New data from VTTI provides insight into cell phone use and driving distraction. Blacksburg, VA: Author.
182.
WallaceB. (2003). Driver distraction by advertising: genuine risk or urban myth?Municipal Engineer, 156, 185–190.
183.
WesterA. E.BockerK. B. E.VolkertsE. R.VersterJ. C.KenemansJ. L. (2008). Event-related potentials and secondary task performance during simulated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 1–7.
184.
WhiteleggJ.HaqG. (2006). Vision Zero: Adopting a target of zero for road traffic fatalities and serious injuries. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute.
185.
WickensC. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In NickersonR. S. (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
186.
WickensC. D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. In DamosD. L. (Ed.), Multiple-task performance (pp. 3–34). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
187.
WickensC. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159–177.
188.
WickensC. D. (2005). Multiple resource time sharing model. In StantonN. A.SalasE.HendrickH. W.HedgeA.BrookhuisK. (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods (pp. 401–407). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
189.
WickensC. D.HooeyB. L.GoreB. F.SebokA.KoenickeC. S. (2009). Identifying black swans in NextGen: Predicting human performance in off-nominal conditions. Human Factors, 51, 638–651.
190.
WickensC. D.McCarleyJ. S.AlexanderA.ThomasL.AmbinderM.ZhengS. (2008). Attention-situation awareness (A-SA) model of pilot error. In FoyleD.HooeyB. (Eds.), Pilot performance models (pp. 397–403). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
191.
WickensC. D.ToplakM. E.WiesenthalD. L. (2008). Cognitive failures as predictors of driving errors, lapses, and violations. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40, 1223–1233.
192.
WickensC. D.VidulichM.Sandry-GarzaD. (1984). Principles of S-C-R compatibility with spatial and verbal tasks: The role of display-control location and voice-interactive display-control interfacing. Human Factors, 26, 533–543.
193.
WierwilleW.TijerinaL. (1998). Modelling the relationship between driver in-vehicle visual demands and accident occurrence. In GaleA. G.BrownI. D.HaslegraveC. M.TaylorS. P. (Eds.), Vision in vehicles VI (pp. 233–244). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
194.
WilliamsonA. (2007). Fatigue and coping with driver distraction. In FaulksI. J.ReganM.StevensonM.BrownJ.PorterA.IrwinJ. D. (Eds.), Distracted driving (pp. 611–622). Sydney, New South Wales: Australasian College of Road Safety.
195.
WogalterM. S.MayhornC. B. (2005). Perceptions of driver distraction by cellular phone users and nonusers. Human Factors, 47, 455–467.
196.
YoungK. L.ReganM. A.LeeJ. D. (2009). Factors moderating the impact of distraction on driving performance and safety. In ReganM. A.LeeJ. D.YoungK. L. (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation (pp. 335–352). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
197.
YoungR. (2001). Association between embedded cellular phone calls and vehicle crashes involving airbag deployment. In Proceedings of Driving Assessment 2001: International Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 390–400). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
198.
YoungR. A.AngellL. S. (2003). The dimensions of driver performance during secondary manual tasks. In Proceedings of the Second Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. (pp. 98–112). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
199.
YoungR. A.AngellL.SullivanJ.SeamanS.HsiehL. (2009). Validation of the static load test for event detection during hands-free conversation. In Proceedings of Driving Assessment 2009: 5th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. (pp. 268–275). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
200.
YoungR. A.AryalB. J.MuresanM.DingX.OjaS.SimpsonS. N. (2005). Road-to-lab: Validation of the static load test for predicting on-road driving performance while using advanced in-vehicle information and communication devices. In Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. (pp. 1–15). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
201.
YoungR. A.SchreinerC. (2007). Conversations on an embedded phone while driving: Predicted vs. observed real-world airbag deployment crash rates [Abstract]. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design (pp. 75–76). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Public Policy Center.
202.
YoungR. A.SchreinerC. (2009). Real-world personal conversations using a hands-free embedded wireless device while driving: Effect on airbag-deployment crash rates. Risk Analysis, 29, 187–204.
