What factors determine when people interleave tasks when multitasking? Here the authors look at the role of priorities and cognitive and motor cues. A study was conducted in which participants steered a simulated vehicle while also dialing two phone numbers that contained sets of repeating digits. Participants tended to interleave tasks after typing in a complete set of repeating digits and sometimes also at the cognitive chunk boundary. The exact pattern of how participants interleaved these tasks depended on their priority objective. A modeling analysis that explored performance for a series of alternative strategies for task interleaving, given the cognitive and task constraints, suggested why participants avoided interleaving at other points: Such strategies tend to move performance away from a trade-off curve that strikes an optimal balance between dialing and driving performance. The study highlights the role that cognitive and motor cues can play in dual-task performance and the importance of being aware, and acting on, priorities. Further implications and limitations are discussed.
AlmH.NilssonL. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 27, 707–715.
2.
AltmannE. M.TraftonJ. G. (2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26, 39–83.
3.
AndersonJ. R.BothellD.LebiereC.MatessaM. (1998). An integrated theory of list memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 341–380.
4.
BaileyB. P.IqbalS. T. (2008). Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 14, 1–28.
5.
BogunovichP.SalvucciD. D. (2010). Inferring multitasking breakpoints from single-task data. In OhlssonS.CatramboneR. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1732–1737). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
6.
BorstJ. P.TaatgenN. A. (2007). The costs of multitasking in threaded cognition. In LewisR. L.PolkT. A.LairdJ. E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 133–138). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
7.
BorstJ. P.TaatgenN. A.Van RijnH. (2010). The problem state: A cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 363–382.
8.
BrookhuisK.De VriesG.De WaardD. (1991). The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 23, 309–316.
9.
BrumbyD. P.DaviesS.JanssenC. P.GraceJ. J. (2011). Fast or safe? How performance objectives determine modality output choices while interacting on the move In TanD.FitzpatrickG.GutwinC.BegoleB.KelloggW. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 473–482). New York, NY: ACM Press.
10.
BrumbyD. P.SalvucciD. D.HowesA. (2007). Dialing while driving? A bounded rational analysis of concurrent multi-task behavior. In LewisR. L.PolkT. A.LairdJ. E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 121–126). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
11.
BrumbyD. P.SalvucciD. D.HowesA. (2009). Focus on driving: How cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving. In GreenbergS.HudsonS. E.HinkleyK.MorrisM. R.OlsenD. R.Jr. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1629–1638). New York, NY: ACM Press.
12.
CardS. K.MoranT. P.NewellA. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CnossenF.MeijmanT.RothengatterT. (2004). Adaptive strategy changes as a function of task demands: A study of car drivers. Ergonomics, 47, 218–236.
14.
Crowd Science. (2009). Social media insights: Twitter. San Jose, CA: Crowd Science.
15.
DielsC.ReedN.WeaverL. (2009). Drivers’ attitudes to distraction and other motorists’ behaviour: A focus group and observational study. Wokingham, UK: TRL Limited.
16.
FittsP. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381–391.
17.
GopherD. (1993). The skill of attention control: Acquisition and execution of attention strategies. In MeyerKornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 299–322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
GopherD.BricknerM.NavonD. (1982). Different difficulty manipulations interact differently with task emphasis: Evidence for multiple resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 146–157.
19.
GrayW. D.SimsC. R.FuW. T.SchoellesM. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113, 461–482.
20.
HornofA. J.ZhangY. (2010). Task-constrained interleaving of perceptual and motor processes in a time-critical dual task as revealed through eye tracking. In SalvucciD. D.GunzelmannG. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of Cognitive Modeling (pp. 97–102). Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University.
21.
HorreyW. J.LeschM. F. (2009). Driver-initiated distractions: Examining strategic adaptation for in-vehicle task initiation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41, 115–122.
22.
HorreyW. J.LeschM. F.GarabetA. (2009). Dissociation between driving performance and drivers’ subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions. Journal of Safety Research, 40, 7–12.
23.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D. (2006). Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48, 196–205.
24.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D.ConsalusK. P. (2006). Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 67–78.
25.
HowesA.LewisR. L.VeraA. (2009). Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: Implications for testing theories of cognition and action. Psychological Review, 116, 717–751.
26.
HowesA.YoungR. M. (1997). The role of cognitive architecture in modeling the user: Soar’s learning mechanism. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 311–343.
27.
IqbalS. T.JuY.-C.HorvitzE. (2010). Cars, calls, and cognition: Investigating driving and divided attention. In HudsonS. E.FitzpatrickG.EdwardsW. K.RoddenT.MynattE. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1281–1290). New York, NY: ACM Press.
28.
JanssenC. P.BrumbyD. P. (2010). Strategic adaptation to performance objectives in a dual-task setting. Cognitive Science, 34, 1548–1560.
29.
JanssenC. P.BrumbyD. P.DowellJ.ChaterN.HowesA. (2011). Identifying optimum performance trade-offs using a cognitively bounded rational analysis model of discretionary task interleaving. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 123–139.
30.
JanssenC. P.BrumbyD. P.GarnettR. (2010). Natural break points: Utilizing motor cues when multitasking. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting (pp. 482–486). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
31.
KierasD. E. (in press). Model-based evaluation. In JackoJ.SearsA. (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook (3rd ed.). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
32.
KirwanB.AinsworthL. K. (Eds.). (1992). A guide to task analysis. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
33.
LeeJ. D.StrayerD. L. (2004). Prefrace to the special section on driver distraction. Human Factors, 46, 583–586.
34.
LevyJ.PashlerH. (2008). Task prioritisation in multitasking during driving: Opportunity to abort a concurrent task does not insulate braking responses from dual-task slowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 507–525.
35.
McKnightA.McKnightA. (1993). The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 25, 259–265.
36.
MiyataY.NormanD. A. (1986). Psychological issues in support of multiple activities. In NormanD. A.DraperS. (Eds.), User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction (pp. 265–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
NavonD.GopherD. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.
38.
NormanD. A.BobrowD. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44–64.
39.
PayneS. J.DugganG. B.NethH. (2007). Discretionary task interleaving: Heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 370–388.
40.
ReedM.GreenP. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task. Ergonomics, 42, 1015–1037.
41.
RosenbaumD. A. (1991). Human motor control. New York, NY: Academic.
42.
SalvucciD. D. (2001). Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: An integrated model approach. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 55, 85–107.
43.
SalvucciD. D. (2005). A multitasking general executive for compound continuous tasks. Cognitive Science, 29, 457–492.
44.
SalvucciD. D.BeltowskaJ. (2008). Effects of memory rehearsal on driver performance: Experiment and theoretical account. Human Factors, 50, 834–844.
45.
SalvucciD. D.BogunovichP. (2010). Multitasking and monotasking: The effects of mental workload on deferred task interruptions. In HudsonS. E.FitzpatrickG.EdwardsW. K.RoddenT.MynattE. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press.
46.
SalvucciD. D.MacugaK. L. (2002). Predicting the effects of cellular-phone dialing on driver performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 95–102.
47.
SalvucciD. D.TaatgenN. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115, 101–130.
48.
StrayerD. L.JohnstonW. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12, 462–466.
49.
WangD. D.ProctorR. W.PickD. F. (2007). Acquisition and transfer of attention allocation strategies in a multiple-task work environment. Human Factors, 49, 995–1004.
50.
WatsonJ. M.StrayerD. L. (2010). Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 479–485.
51.
WickensC. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50, 449–455.
