Society,Her or Me? An Explanatory Model of Intimate Femicide Among Male Perpetrators in Buenos Aires,Argentina

Abstract

Intimate femicide perpetrators are rarely studied despite their important role as drivers of violence. This paper analyzes the explanatory narratives of men who intentionally killed their female intimate partners in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with 12 participants. Data were analyzed using Atlas.Ti and an inductive thematic coding strategy. Two dimensions—frequency of physical violence in the relationship and locus of explanation—were used to identify four narrative archetypes: victim, redemption, extraordinary, and outburst. Greater attention should be paid to perpetrator life trajectories and narratives including the gender and violence discourses that shape explanations for perpetration.

Keywords

femicide intimate partner violence violence against women masculinities narrative qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adshead

(2003). Three degrees of security. In Pfafflin

Adshead

(Eds.), A matter of security: The application of attachment theory to forensic psychiatry and psychotherapy (pp. 47–66). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Adshead

Berko

Bose

Ferrito

Mindang

(2018). Is there a murderer here? The language of agency and violence in homicide perpetrators. In Adlam

Kluttig

Lee

(Eds.), Violent states and creative states (Volume 2): Human violence and creative humanity (Vol. 2, pp. 53–64). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Adshead

Ferrito

Bose

(2015). Recovery after homicide: Narrative shifts in therapy with homicide perpetrators. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550030

Amaya

(2012, February 28). Wanda Taddei: una relación difícil con un final trágico [Wanda Taddei: A difficult relationship with a tragic ending]. La Nacion. https://www.lanacion.com.ar/seguridad/wanda-taddei-una-relacion-dificil-con-un-final-tragico-nid1451878

Baird

(2018). Convertirse en el más malo: trayectorias masculinas de violencia en las pandillas de Medellín [Becoming the baddest: Masculine trajectories of gang violence in Medellín]. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 20(2), 9–48. https://dx.doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.6817

Baird

(2019). Man a kill a man for nutin’: Gang transnationalism, masculinities, and Violence in Belize City. Men and Masculinities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X19872787

Block

C. R.

(2003). How can practitioners help an abused woman lower her risk of death? National Institute of Justice Journal, (250), 4–7.

Boira

Carbajosa

Lila

(2014). Principales retos en el tratamiento grupal de los hombres condenados por un delito de violencia de género [Main challenges in group treatment for men Convicted of a crime of gender violence]. Clínica Contemporánea, 5(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.5093/cc2014a1

Boira

Carbajosa

Marcuello

(2013). La violencia en la pareja desde tres perspectivas: Víctimas, agresores y profesionales [Partner violence from three perspectives: Victims, abusers, and professionals]. Psychosocial Intervention, 22(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.5093/in2013a15

10.

Boira Sarto

. (2010). Hombres maltratadores. Historias de violencia masculina [Abusive men. Stories of male violence]. Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.

11.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

12.

Briggs

(2011). Tales from prison: reflections on a decade of offender research. Safer Communities, 10(4), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/17578041111185695

13.

Campbell

J. C.

Abrahams

Martin

(2008). Perpetration of violence against intimate partners: health care implications from global data. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 179(6), 511–512. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081145

14.

Campbell

J. C.

Glass

Sharps

P. W.

Laughon

Bloom

(2007). Intimate partner homicide: Review and implications of research and policy. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(3), 246–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007303505

15.

Campbell

Runyan

C. W.

(1998). Femicide: Guest editors’ introduction. Homicide Studies, 2(4), 347–352.

16.

Campbell

J. C.

Webster

Koziol-McLain

Block

Campbell

Curry

M. A.

Gary

Glass

McFarlane

Sachs

Sharps

Ulrich

Wilt

S. A.

Manganello

Schollenberger

Frye

Laughon

(2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93(7), 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.7.1089

17.

Collins

(2009). Violence: A micro-sociological theory. Princeton University Press.

18.

Connell

Messerschmidt

(2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19(6), 829–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639

19.

Coomber

(2002). Signing your life away?: Why Research Ethics Committees (REC) shouldn’t always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights-the case of criminal populations.(Commentary). Sociological Research Online, 7(1), 218–221. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.678

20.

Corradi

Marcuello-Servós

Boira

Weil

(2016). Theories of femicide and their significance for social research. Current Sociology, 64(7), 975–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115622256

21.

Corte Suprema de Justicia de La Nación. (2020). Registro Nacional de Femicidios de la Justicia Argentina [National Registry of Femicides from the Supreme Court of Argentina]. Oficina de la Mujer. https://www.csjn.gov.ar/omrecopilacion/omfemicidio/homefemicidio.html

22.

De Haan

. (2008). Violence as an essentially contested concept. In Body-Gendrot

Spierenburg

(Eds.), Violence in Europe. Historical and contemporary perspectives (pp. 27–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09705-3

23.

Denzin

N. K.

(1989). Interpretive biography (Vol. 17). Sage.

24.

Dobash

R. E.

Dobash

R. P.

(2011). What were they thinking? Men who murder an intimate partner. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210391219

25.

Dobash

R. E.

Dobash

R. P.

(2015). When men murder women. Oxford University Press.

26.

Dobash

R. E.

Dobash

R. P.

(2017). When women are murdered. In Brookman

Maguire

E. R.

(Eds.), The handbook of homicide (pp. 131–149). Wiley Blackwell.

27.

Dobash

R. E.

Dobash

R. P.

Cavanagh

(2009). “Out of the blue”: Men who murder an intimate partner. Feminist Criminology, 4(3), 194–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085109332668

28.

Downes

D. M.

Rock

P. E.

(1995). Understanding deviance: a guide to the sociology of crime and rule-breaking. Oxford University Press.

29.

Ehrenberg

(2016). The weariness of the self: Diagnosing the history of depression in the contemporary age. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.

30.

Evans

D. P.

DeSousa Williams

N. S.

Wilkins

J. D.

Chiang

E. D.

Manders

O. C.

Vertamatti

M. A.

(2018). “He said he was going to kill me”: Case Studies of Attempted Intimate Femicide in São Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 13(1), 14–19.

31.

Farmer

(2009). On suffering and structural violence: A view from below. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts, 3(1), 11–28.

32.

Farrington

D. P.

(2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theoretical and empirical issues-the 2002 Sutherland Award address. Criminology, 41(2), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00987.x

33.

Fernández

A. M.

(2012). Femicidios: la ferocidad del patriarcado [Femicide: The ferocity of patriarchy]. Nomadías, 16(1), 47–73.

34.

Ferrell

(1997). Criminological verstehen: Inside the immediacy of crime. Justice Quarterly, 14(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829700093201

35.

Ferrito

Needs

Adshead

(2017). Unveiling the shadows of meaning: Meaning-making for perpetrators of homicide. Aggression and violent behavior, 34, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.009

36.

Ferrito

Vetere

Adshead

Moore

(2012). Life after homicide: Accounts of recovery and redemption of offender patients in a high security hospital—a qualitative study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23(3), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2012.668211

37.

Fleming

P. J.

Gruskin

Rojo

Dworkin

S. L.

(2015). Mens violence against women and men are inter-related: Recommendations for simultaneous intervention. Social Science & Medicine, 146, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.021

38.

Fleming

P. J.

Mccleary-Sills

Morton

Levtov

Heilman

Barker

(2015). Risk factors for men’s lifetime perpetration of physical violence against intimate partners: Results from the International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES) in eight countries. Plos One, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118639

39.

Flood

(2019). Engaging men and boys in violence prevention. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44208-6

40.

Fulu

Jewkes

Roselli

Garcia-Moreno

(2013). Prevalence of and factors associated with male perpetration of intimate partner violence: Findings from the UN Multi-country cross-sectional study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific. The Lancet Global Health, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70074-3

41.

Garriga Zucal

. (2012). Aplicar Mafia. La violencia como dimensión de un estilo popular [“Aplicar mafia”. Violence as a dimension of the style of lower classes]. AVATARES de la comunicación y la cultura, (3). http://ppct.caicyt.gov.ar/index.php/avatares/issue/view/Culturas%20populares

42.

Hankiss

(1981). Ontologies of the self: On the mythological rearranging of one’s life-history. In Bertaux

(Ed.), Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences (pp. 203–209). Sage.

43.

Hearn

(1998). The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446279069

44.

Heilman

Barker

(2018). Masculine norms and violence: Making the connections. Promundo US.

45.

Hennink

Hutter

Bailey

(2011). Qualitative research methods (1st ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

46.

Henson

J. R.

Olson

L. N.

(2010). The monster within: How male serial killers discursively manage their stigmatized identities. Communication Quarterly, 58(3), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2010.503176

47.

Husserl

(1931). Ideas: general introduction to pure phenomenology. MacMillian.

48.

Hycner

R. H.

(1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human studies, 8(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142995

49.

Israel

Hay

(2007). Research ethics for social scientists: between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. Sage.

50.

Johnson

Eriksson

Mazerolle

Wortley

(2019). Intimate femicide: The role of coercive control. Feminist Criminology, 14(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085117701574

51.

Kaczmarek

(2018). How to distinguish medicalization from over-medicalization? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 22(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-018-9850-1

52.

Kohan

(2018). Una metodología para estimar los femicidios en la Argentina a partir de las estadísticas vitales [A methodology for estimating femicides in Argentina from vital statistics]. Notas de Población, 106, 153–184.

53.

La Capital de Mar del Plata. (2018). Femicidio de Domínguez: una relación violenta que no fue denunciada [Domínguez Femicide: A violent relationship that was not denouced] . La Capital Mar de Plata. https://www.lacapitalmdp.com/femicidio-dominguez-una-relacion-violenta-que-no-fue-denunciada/

54.

La Casa del Encuentro. (2018). Informe de investigación de femicidios en Argentina desde año 2008 a 2017 [Investigation report of femicides in Argentina from 2008 to 2017]. La Casa del Encuentro.

55.

Launius

Hassel

(2015). Threshold concepts in women’s and gender studies: Ways of seeing, thinking, and knowing (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203730218

56.

Leclerc-Olive

(2003). Entre mémoire et expérience : le passé qui insiste [Between memory and experience, the past that insists]. Revue Projet. https://www.revue-projet.com/articles/2003-1-entre-memoire-et-experience-le-passe-qui-insiste/7409

57.

Liebling

(1999). Doing research in prison: Breaking the silence. Theoretical Criminology, 3(2), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480699003002002

58.

Lien

M. I.

Lorentzen

(2019). Men’s experiences of violence in intimate relationships. Palgrave Macmillan

59.

McLellan

MacQueen

K. M.

Neidig

J. L.

(2003). Beyond the qualitative interview: Data preparation and transcription. Field Methods, 15(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239573

60.

Meccia

(2019). Cuéntame tu vida. Análisis sociobiográgico de narrativas del yo [Talk about yourself. Sociobiograpghic analysis of narratives of the self]. In Meccia

(comp.). Biografías y sociedad. Métodos y perspectivas (pp. 63–96). EUDEBA/Ediciones UNL.

61.

Messerschmidt

J. W.

(2017). Masculinities and femicide. Qualitative Sociology Review, 13(3), 70–79.

62.

Nee

(2004). The offender’s perspective on crime: Methods and principles in data collection. In Needs

Towl

(Eds.), Applying psychology to forensic practice (pp. 3–17). BPS Blackwell.

63.

Otamendi

M. A.

(2020). Suicidios, femicidios-suicidios y armas de fuego en Argentina [Suicides, femicides-suicides and guns in Argentina. Hegemonic masculinity in dispute]. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 33(46), 107–130. https://dx.doi.org/10.26489/rvs.v33i46.6

64.

Panzerini

(2017). “Un crimen espeluznante”: Condenaron a 21 años de prisión al asesino de Chiara Páez [“A shocking crime”: Chiara Páez’s murderer was sentenced to 21 years in prison.]. Pagina 12. https://www.pagina12.com.ar/61678-un-crimen-espeluznante

65.

Pettigrew

(2020). Confessions of a serial killer: A neutralisation analysis. Homicide Studies, 24(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767918793674

66.

Presser

(2004). Violent offenders, moral selves: Constructing identities and accounts in the research interview. Social Problems, 51(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.1.82

67.

Riches

(1986). The phenomenon of violence. In The anthropology of violence (pp. 1–27). Blackwell.

68.

Roberts

Indermaur

(2003). Signed consent forms in criminological research: Protection for Researchers and Ethics Committees but a threat to research participants? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 10(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.2003.10.2.289

69.

Rosenthal

(2006). The narrated life story: On the interrelation between experience, memory and narration. In Milnes

(Ed.), Narrative, memory & knowledge: Representations, aesthetics, contexts (pp. 1–16). University of Huddersfield.

70.

Rosenthal

(2018). Interpretive social research—An introduction. Göttingen University Press.

71.

Roy

(2008). The grey zone: the “ordinary” violence of extraordinary times. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14(2), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00503.x

72.

Ruotti

Massa

V. C.

Peres

M. F. T.

(2011). Vulnerabilidade e violência: uma nova concepção de risco para o estudo dos homicídios de jovens [Vulnerability and violence: A new conception of risk for the study of youth homicides]. Interface-Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 15(37), 377–389.

73.

Russell

D. E. H.

Van De Ven

(1990). Femicide. In Russell

D. E. H.

Van de Ven

(Eds.), Crimes against women: proceedings of the International Tribunal (3rd ed., pp. 104–108). Russell Publications. http://www.dianarussell.com/f/Crimes_Against_Women_Tribunal.pdf

74.

Segato

(2003). Las estructuras elementales de la violencia [The elemental structures of violence]. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

75.

Segato

(2006). La escritura en el cuerpo de las mujeres asesinadas en Ciudad Juárez. Territorio, soberanía y crímenes de segundo estado [The writing on the bodies of the murdered women in Ciudad Juárez. Territory, sovereignty and second state crimes]. Tinta Limón.

76.

Shaw

D. M.

Wangmo

Elger

B. S.

(2014). Conducting ethics research in prison: Why, who, and what? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 11(3), 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9559-7

77.

Singh

(2007). Quantitative social research methods. SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9789351507741

78.

Sykes

G. M.

Matza

(1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American sociological review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195

79.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2019). Global Study on Homicide 2019. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

80.

Viscardi

(2006). Delitos, trayectorias de vida y procesos socializadores de jóvenes vinculados a Programas de Rehabilitación. Puertas cerradas, vida hacia adentro [Crimes, life trajectories and socializing processes of young people linked to rehabilitation programs: Closed doors, introspective life]. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 19(23), 45–62.

81.

Ward

S. A.

(2008). Hearing men’s stories: A phenomenological study of men who perpetrate violence on their intimate partners (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida).

82.

Weil

(2016). Failed femicides among migrant survivors. Qualitative Sociology Review, 12(4), 6–21.

83.

Weil

Corradi

Naudi

(2018). Femicide across Europe: Theory, research and prevention. Policy Press. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/28243

84.

Weil

Kouta

(2017). Femicide: A glance through qualitative lenses. Qualitative Sociology Review, 13(3), 6–12.

85.

World Health Organization. (2012). Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence (No. WHO/RHR/12.36). World Health Organization.