Gender socialization is a key factor in explaining gender differences in managing fear of crime and risks in public space. By emphasizing the continuing role of traditional norms that underline women’s vulnerability and prescribe safekeeping, previous studies have ignored the role of increasing gender equality, alternative norms that prescribe women’s independence and strength, and resistance to traditional norms. Based on in-depth interviews with 28 couples, this article explores women’s ambivalence and resistance toward traditional norms, how talk and practice reflect mixed messages on how to “properly” do gender, and aligning as well as conflicting views and roles within couples.
CBS. (2014). Emancipatiemonitor 2014 [Emancipation monitor 2014]. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek/Statistics Netherlands.
2.
CobbinaJ. E.MillerJ.BrunsonR. K. (2008). Gender, neighborhood danger, and risk-avoidance strategies among urban African-American youths. Criminology, 46, 673-709.
3.
CopsD.PleysierS. (2011). “Doing gender” in fear of crime: The impact of gender identity on reported levels of fear of crime in adolescents and young adults. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 58-74.
4.
DeutschF. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21, 106-127.
5.
DeutschF. M.SaxonS. E. (1998). The double standard of praise and criticism for mothers and fathers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 665-683.
6.
FoxB. (2001). The formative years: How parenthood creates gender. Canadian Review of Sociology, 38, 373-390.
7.
FranklinC. A.FranklinT. W. (2009). Predicting fear of crime: Considering differences across gender. Feminist Criminology, 4, 83-106.
8.
GilchristE.BannisterJ.DittonJ.FarrallS. (1998). Women and the “fear of crime” challenging the accepted stereotype. British Journal of Criminology, 38, 283-298.
9.
GoodeyJ. (1997). Boys don’t cry: Masculinities, fear of crime and fearlessness. British Journal of Criminology, 37, 401-418.
10.
HengeholdL. (2011). When safety becomes a duty: Gender, loneliness, and citizenship for urban women. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 39, 48-69.
11.
HollanderJ. A. (2001). Vulnerability and dangerousness: The construction of gender through conversation about violence. Gender & Society, 15, 83-109.
12.
HooghiemstraE. (2000). Denken over verdelen [Thinking about dividing]. In KeuzekampS.HooghiemstraE.BreedveldK.MerensA. (Eds.), De Kunst van het combineren [The art of combining] (pp. 101-124). Den Haag: SCP/The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
13.
JacksonJ. (2009). A psychological perspective on vulnerability in the fear of crime. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 365-390.
14.
KoskelaH. (1997). “Bold walk and breakings”: Women’s spatial confidence versus fear of violence. Gender, Place and Culture, 4, 301-320.
15.
KraaykampG. (2012). Employment status and family role attitudes: A trend analysis for the Netherlands. International Sociology, 27, 308-329.
16.
MadrizE. I. (1997). Images of criminals and victims a study on women’s fear and social control. Gender & Society, 11, 342-356.
17.
PainR. (1991). Space, sexual violence and social control: Integrating geographical and feminist analyses of women’s fear of crime. Progress in Human Geography, 15, 415-431.
18.
PantazisC. (2000). “Fear of crime,” vulnerability and poverty. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 414-436.
19.
PayneG.GrewC. (2005). Unpacking “class ambivalence”: Some conceptual and methodological issues in accessing class cultures. Sociology, 39, 893-910.
20.
RaderN. E. (2008). Gendered fear strategies: Intersections of doing gender and fear management strategies in married and divorced women’s lives. Sociological Focus, 41, 34-52.
21.
RaderN. E. (2009). Until death do us part? Husband perceptions and responses to fear of crime. Deviant Behavior, 31, 33-59.
22.
RaderN. E.CossmanJ. S.PorterJ. R. (2012). Fear of crime and vulnerability: Using a national sample of Americans to examine two competing paradigms. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 134-141.
23.
RaderN. E.HaynesS. H. (2011). Gendered fear of crime socialization: An extension of Akers’s social learning theory. Feminist Criminology, 6, 291-307.
24.
RismanB. J. (2009). From doing to undoing: Gender as we know it. Gender & Society, 23, 81-84.
25.
RuitenbergJ. F. (2014). Socialized choices: Labour market behaviour of Dutch mothers. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pallas Publications.
26.
SandbergL.RönnblomM. (2013). Afraid and restricted vs bold and equal: Women’s fear of violence and gender equality discourses in Sweden. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20, 189-203.
27.
ScottH. (2003). Stranger danger: Explaining women’s fear of crime. Western Criminology Review, 4, 203-214.
28.
SCP. (2009). M/V. SCP-nieuwjaarsuitgave 2009 [M/F. SCP New Year’s Edition]. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
29.
SnedkerK. A. (2006). Altruistic and vicarious fear of crime: Fear for others and gendered social roles. Sociological Forum, 21, 163-195.
30.
SnedkerK. A. (2012). Explaining the gender gap in fear of crime assessments of risk and vulnerability among New York City residents. Feminist Criminology, 7, 75-111.
31.
StankoE. A. (1988). Fear of crime and the myth of the safe home: A feminist critique of criminology. In YlloK.BogradM. (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 75-88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
StankoE. A. (1997). Safety talk: Conceptualizing women’s risk assessment as a “technology of the soul.”Theoretical Criminology, 1, 479-499.
33.
SuttonR. M.FarrallS. (2005). Gender, socially desirable responding and the fear of crime are women really more anxious about crime?British Journal of Criminology, 45, 212-224.
34.
SuttonR. M.FarrallS. (2009). Untangling the web: Deceptive responding in fear of crime research. In MurrayL.FarrallS. (Eds.), Fear of crime: Critical voices in an age of anxiety (pp. 108-124). London, England: Routledge.
35.
SuttonR. M.RobinsonB.FarrallS. D. (2011). Gender, fear of crime, and self-presentation: An experimental investigation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 421-433.
36.
UsdanskyM. L. (2011). The gender-equality paradox: Class and incongruity between work-family attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 163-178.
37.
VanderveenG. N. G. (2006). Interpreting fear, crime, risk, and unsafety: Conceptualisation and measurement. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Boom Koninklijke Uitgevers.
38.
van DijkJ.TseloniA.FarrellG. (Eds.). (2012). The international crime drop: New directions in research. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
VolmanM.ten DamG. (1998). Equal but different: Contradictions in the development of gender identity in the 1990s. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19, 529-545.
40.
WarrM.EllisonC. G. (2000). Rethinking social reactions to crime: Personal and altruistic fear in family households. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 551-578.
41.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.
42.
YavorskyJ. E.SayerL. (2013). “Doing fear”: The influence of hetero-femininity on (trans) women’s fears of victimization. The Sociological Quarterly, 54, 511-533.
