The current study examined whether measures of structural gender equality conditioned the effects of defendant gender on incarceration decisions. Using data from the State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) database, multilevel logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between both case- and county-level variables on incarceration decisions on a sample of defendants sentenced in state courts. Results indicated that women were less likely to be sentenced to prison than men, but there was no gender difference for jail and noncustodial sentences; however, the structural gender equality measures exerted only slight influences over sentencing outcomes.
AlbonettiC. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
2.
BaileyW. C. (1999). The socioeconomic status of women and patterns of forcible rape for major U.S. cities. Sociological Focus, 32, 43-63.
3.
BaileyW. C.PetersonR. D. (1995). Gender inequality and violence against women In HaganJ.PetersonR. D. (Eds.), Crime and inequality (pp. 174-205). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
BelknapJ. (2014). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
5.
BlalockH. M.Jr. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York, NY: Capricorn.
6.
BontragerS.BarrickK.StupiE. (2013). Gender and sentencing: A meta-analysis of contemporary research. Journal of Gender, Race, & Justice, 16, 349-372.
7.
BrittC. L. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17, 707-732.
8.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
9.
CarrollL.JacksonP. I. (1982). Minority composition, inequality, and growth of the municipal police forces, 1960-71. Sociological Focus, 15, 327-346.
10.
Chesney-LindM. (2006). Patriarchy, crime, and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1, 6-26.
11.
CrewB. K. (1991). Sex differences in criminal sentences: Chivalry or patriarchy?Justice Quarterly, 8, 59-83.
12.
DalyK. (1987a). Discrimination in the criminal courts: Family, gender, and the problem of equal treatment. Social Forces, 66, 152-175.
13.
DalyK. (1987b). Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law & Society Review, 21, 267-290.
14.
DalyK. (1989a). Neither conflict nor labeling nor paternalism will suffice: Intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and family in criminal court decisions. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 136-168.
DalyK.BordtR. L. (1995). Sex effects and sentencing: An analysis of the statistical literature. Justice Quarterly, 12, 141-175.
17.
DixonJ. (1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1157-1198.
18.
DoernerJ. K.DemuthS. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1-27.
19.
DoernerJ. K.DemuthS. (2014). Gender and sentencing in the federal courts: Are women treated more leniently?Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 242-269.
20.
EisensteinJ.FlemmingR. B.NardulliP. F. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
21.
EmbryR.LyonsP. M. (2012). Sex-based sentencing: Sentencing discrepancies between male and female sex offenders. Feminist Criminology, 7, 146-162.
22.
FarnworthM.TeskeR. H. C.Jr. (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing: Three hypotheses of disparity. Women & Criminal Justice, 6(2), 23-44.
23.
FearnN. E. (2005). A multilevel analysis of community effects on criminal sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 22, 452-487.
24.
FeldmeyerB.WarrenP. Y.SiennickS. E.NeptuneM. (2015). Racial, ethnic, and immigrant threat: Is there a new criminal threat on state sentencing?Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 52, 62-92.
25.
FreiburgerT. L. (2010). The effects of gender, family status, and race on sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 378-395.
26.
FreiburgerT. L. (2011). The impact of gender, offense type, and familial role on the decision to incarcerate. Social Justice Research, 24, 143-167.
27.
FreiburgerT. L.HilinskiC. M. (2013). An examination of the interactions of race and gender on sentencing using a trichotomous dependent variable. Crime & Delinquency, 59, 59-86.
28.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel hierarchical models (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GruhlJ.WelchS.SpohnC. (1984). Women as criminal defendants: A test for paternalism. The Western Political Quarterly, 37, 456-467.
30.
HarringtonM. P.SpohnC. (2007). Defining sentence type: Further evidence against use of the total incarceration variable. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 44, 36-63.
31.
HeimerK. (2000). Changes in the gender gap in crime and women’s economic marginalization. Criminal Justice, 1, 427-483.
32.
HelmsR.JacobsD. (2002). The political context of sentencing: An analysis of community and individual determinants. Social Forces, 81, 577-604.
33.
HolleranD.SpohnC. (2004). On the use of the total incarceration variable in sentencing research. Criminology, 42, 211-240.
34.
JohnsonB. D. (2005). Contextual disparities in guidelines departures: Courtroom social contexts, guidelines compliance, and extralegal disparities in criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 761-796.
35.
JohnsonB. D. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge-and county-level influences. Criminology, 44, 259-298.
36.
KoeppelM. D. H. (2014). Gender sentencing of rural property offenders in Iowa. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 208-226.
37.
Koons-WittB. A. (2002). The effect of gender on the decision to incarcerate before and after the introduction of sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 297-328.
38.
Koons-WittB. A.SevignyE. L.BurrowJ. D.HesterR. (2014). Gender and sentencing outcomes in South Carolina: Examining the interactions with race, age, and offense type. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25, 299-324.
39.
KramerJ. H.UlmerJ. T. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 81-106.
40.
KramerJ. H.UlmerJ. T. (2002). Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local court “corrections” to Pennsylvania’s sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 897-932.
41.
KramerJ. H.UlmerJ. T. (2009). Sentencing guidelines: Lessons from Pennsylvania. Boulder, CO: Lynne-Rienner Publishers.
42.
LeiberM. J.Beaudry-CyrM.PeckJ. H.MackK. Y. (2018). Sentencing recommendations by probation officers and judges: An examination of adult offenders across gender. Women & Criminal Justice, 28, 100-124.
43.
LiskaA. E. (1992). Introduction to the study of social control. In LiskaA. E. (Ed.), Social threat and social control (pp. 1-29). Albany: State University of New York Press.
44.
MearsD. P.StewartE. A.WarrenP. Y.SimonsR. L. (2017). Culture and formal social control: The effect of the code of the street on police and court decision-making. Justice Quarterly, 34, 217-247.
45.
MouldsE. F. (1978). Chivalry and paternalism: Disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system. Western Political Quarterly, 31, 416-430.
46.
MustardD. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 285-314.
47.
MyersM. A.TalaricoS. M. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
48.
NowackiJ. S. (2017). An intersectional approach to race/ethnicity, sex, and age disparity in federal sentencing outcomes: An examination of policy across time periods. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17, 97-116.
49.
NowackiJ. S. (2018). Federal sentencing guidelines and United States v. Booker: Social context and sentencing disparity. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29, 45-66.
50.
NowackiJ. S.WindsongE. A. (2019). Structural gender equality and federal sentencing outcomes: A test of the ameliorative and backlash hypotheses. Feminist Criminology, 14, 45-64.
51.
PetersonR. D.BaileyW. C. (1992). Rape and dimensions of gender socioeconomic inequality in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 29, 162-177.
52.
PinchevskyG. M.SteinerB. (2016). Sex-based disparities in pretrial release decisions and outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 62, 308-340.
53.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. Volume I: Continuous responses. College Station, TX: STATA Press.
54.
ReavesB. A. (2013). Felony defendants in large urban counties, 2009-statistical tablesWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
55.
RodriguezF. S.CurryT. R.LeeG. (2006). Gender differences in criminal sentencing: Do effects vary across violent, property, and drug offenses?Social Science Quarterly, 87, 318-339.
56.
RomainD. M.FreiburgerT. L. (2016). Chivalry revisited: Gender, race/ethnicity, and offense type on domestic violence charge reduction. Feminist Criminology, 11, 191-222.
57.
RussellD. E. (1975). The politics of rape: The victim’s perspective. New York, NY: Stein and Day.
58.
RyonS. B. (2013). Gender as social threat: A study of offender sex, situational factors, gender dynamics and social control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 426-437.
59.
SlivaS. M. (2016). Determinants of state innovations in American sentencing and corrections policy: A systematic review. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27, 702-722.
60.
SpohnC. (1999). Gender and sentencing of drug offenders: Is chivalry dead?Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9, 365-399.
61.
SpohnC. (2009). How do judges decide? The search for fairness and justice in punishment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
SpohnC.BeichnerD. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.
63.
SpohnC.GruhlJ.WelchS. (1987). The impact of the ethnicity and gender of defendants on the decision to reject or dismiss felony charges. Criminology, 25, 175-192.
64.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
65.
SpohnC.SpearsJ. W. (1997). Gender and case processing decisions. Women & Criminal Justice, 8(3), 29-59.
66.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261.
67.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StreifelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31, 411-446.
68.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
69.
SteffensmeierD. J. (1980). Assessing the impact of the women’s movement on sex-based differences in the handling of adult criminal defendants. Crime & Delinquency, 26, 344-357.
70.
TillyerR.HartleyR. D.WardJ. T. (2015). Differential treatment of female defendants: Does criminal history moderate the effect of gender on sentence length in federal narcotics cases?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 703-721.
71.
UlmerJ. T.JohnsonB. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-177.
72.
UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34, 383-408.
73.
VieraitisL. M.KovandzicT.BrittoS. (2008). Women’s status and risk of homicide victimization: An analysis with data disaggregated by victim offender relationship. Homicide Studies, 12, 163-176.
74.
WangX.MearsD. P. (2010). A multilevel test of minority threat effects on sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 191-215.
75.
WangX.MearsD. P. (2015). Sentencing and state-level racial and ethnic contexts. Law & Society Review, 49, 883-915.
76.
WestB. T.GaleckiA. T.WelchK. B. (2014). Linear mixed models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
77.
WhaleyR. B. (2001). The paradoxical relationship between gender inequality and rape: Toward a refined theory. Gender & Society, 15, 531-555.
78.
WhaleyR. B.MessnerS. F. (2002). Gender equality and gendered homicides. Homicide Studies, 6, 188-210.
79.
WhaleyR. B.MessnerS. F.VeyseyB. M. (2013). The relationship between gender equality and rates of inter- and intra-sexual lethal violence: An exploration of functional form. Justice Quarterly, 30, 732-754.
80.
WilliamsJ. E.HolmesK. A. (1981). The second assault: Rape and public attitudes. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
81.
XieM.HeimerK.LauritsenJ. L. (2012). Violence against women in U.S. metropolitan areas: Changes in women’s status and risk, 1980-2004. Criminology, 50, 105-143.
