Research of intimate partner abuse has not adequately assessed the role of gender in situational couple violence (SCV). This research examines gendered effects of SCV on outcomes using longitudinal data from the United States National Survey of Family and Households. Results show gender asymmetries in physical health, depression, and fear outcomes of respondents exposed to SCV. Women exposed to physical SCV are less likely to report good physical health and more likely to report depression and fear than control-group women. No significant relationships are found for men. Implications suggest inclusion of outcomes when assessing gender symmetry in intimate partner abuse.
AndersonJ. E.AbrahamM.BruessowD. M.ColemanR. D.McCarthyK. C.Harris-OdimgbeT.TongC. K. (2008). Cross-cultural perspectives on intimate partner violence. Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, 21(4), 36-44.
3.
AndersonK. L. (2005). Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles, 52, 853-865.
4.
AndersonK. L.UmbersonD. (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society, 15, 358-380.
5.
ArcherJ. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651-680.
6.
BarberJ.MullerS.WhitehurstT.HayE. (2010). Measuring morbidity: Self-report or health care records?Family Practice, 27, 25-30.
BohannonJ. R.DosserD. A.LindleyS. E. (1995). Using couple data to determine domestic violence rates: An attempt to replicate previous work. Violence and Victims, 10, 133-141.
9.
BrownmillerS. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. New York, NY: Ballantine.
10.
BrushL. D. (1990). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. Gender and Society, 4, 56-67.
11.
BumpassL. L.SweetJ. A. (1988). National Survey of Families and Households: Wave 1. Madison: University of Wisconsin: Center for Demography and Ecology
12.
BumpassL. L.SweetJ. A. (1994). National Survey of Households and Families: Wave 2. Madison: University of Wisconsin: Center for Demography of Health and Aging Affiliation. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/intro.htm
13.
BumpassL. L.SweetJ. A. (2003). National Survey of Family and Households Wave 3(Introduction to the NSFH3 codebooks and other documentation). Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/intro.htm
CaetanoR.VaethP.Ramisetty-MiklerS. (2008). Intimate partner violence victim and perpetrator characteristics among couples in the United States. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 507-518.
17.
CampbellJ. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet, 359, 1331-1336.
18.
CampbellJ. C.LewandowskiL. A. (1997). Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 20, 353-374.
19.
CampbellJ. C.SoekenK. (1999). Women’s responses to battering over time: An analysis of change. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 21-40.
20.
CatalanoS. (2007). Intimate partner violence in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
21.
Centers for Disease Control. (2008). Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence—United States, 2005Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, 57, 113-117.
22.
CokerA. L.DavisK. E.AriasI.DesaiS.SandersonM.BrandtH. M.SmithP. H. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23, 260-268.
23.
CokerA. L.SmithP. H.BetheaL.KingM. R.McKeownR. E. (2000). Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Archives of Family Medicine, 9, 451-457.
24.
CronholmP. F. (2006). Intimate partner violence and men’s health. Primary Care, 33, 199-209.
25.
Das DasguptaS. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364-1389.
26.
Das DasguptaS. (2007). Body evidence: Intimate partner violence against south Asian women in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
27.
DaviesL.Ford-GilboeM.HammertonJ. (2009). Gender inequality and patterns of abuse post leaving. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 27-39.
28.
DemakakosP.NazrooJ.BreezeE.MarmotM. (2008). Socioeconomic status and health: The role of subjective social status. Social Science & Medicine, 67, 330-340.
29.
DietmarD. W. W.EddaE. P. P.SiegfriedS. K. K. (2005). Anger attacks in depression as evidence for a male depressive syndrome. Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics, 74, 303-307.
30.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York, NY: Free Press.
31.
DobashR. E.DobashR. P.CavanaghK.LewisR. (2004). Not an ordinary killer; Just an ordinary guy: When men murder an intimate woman partner. Violence Against Women, 10, 577-605.
32.
DowdL. (2001). Female perpetrators of partner aggression: Relevant issues and treatment. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5, 73-104.
33.
DuetzM. S.AbelT.NiemannS. (2003). Health measures. European Journal of Public Health, 13, 313-319.
34.
DuttonD. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: UBC Press.
35.
DuttonD. G.GolantS. K. (1995). The batterer, a psychological profile. New York, NY: Basic Books.
36.
FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J.RidderE. M. (2005). Partner violence and mental health outcomes in a New Zealand birth cohort. Journal of Marriage & Family, 67, 1103-1119.
37.
FiebertM. S. (2004). References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: An annotated bibliography. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 8, 140-177.
38.
FletcherJ. (2009). The effects of intimate partner violence on health in young adulthood in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 130-135.
GayleV. (2003, Nov11). Economic and Social Research Council longitudinal data analysis workshop 2B. Retrieved from www.lss.stir.ac.uk/STATA.doc
41.
GellesR. J. (1984). Exchange/ social control theory. Toward a theory of intrafamily violence. In FinkelhorD.GellesR.StrausM.HotalingG. (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research (pp. 151-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
GellesR. J. (2007). Family violence. In GellesR. J.FlanneryD. J.VazsonyiA. T.WaldmanI. D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior and aggression (pp. 403-417). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
43.
GoldingJ. M. (1999). Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for mental disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 99-132.
44.
GormanB. K.ReadJ. G. (2006). Gender disparities in adult health: An examination of three measures of morbidity. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 47, 95-110.
45.
HouryD.RhodesK. V.KemballR. S.ClickL.CerulliC.McNuttL. A.KaslowN. J. (2008). Differences in female and male victims and perpetrators of partner violence with respect to WEB scores. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1041-1055.
46.
JacobsonN.GottmanJ. (1998). When men batter women. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
47.
JohnsonM. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
48.
JohnsonM. P. (2005). Domestic violence: It’s not about gender, or is it?Journal of Marriage & Family, 67, 1126-1130.
49.
JohnsonM. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 1003-1018.
50.
JohnsonM. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
51.
JohnsonM. P.FerraroK. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963.
52.
JohnsonM. P.LeoneJ. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 322-349.
53.
KimmelM. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8, 1332-1363.
54.
KimmelM. S. (2008). The gendered society (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
LeeM.-A.CarrD. (2007). Does the context of spousal loss affect the physical functioning of older widowed persons?Research on Aging, 29, 457-487.
56.
LeoneJ. M.JohnsonM. P.CohanC. L. (2007). Victim help seeking: Differences between intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. Family Relations, 56, 427-439.
57.
LipskyS.CaetanoR. (2007). Impact of intimate partner violence on unmet need for mental health care: Results from the NSDUH. Psychiatric Services, 58, 822-829.
58.
MatthewsS.ManorO.PowerC. (1999). Social inequalities in health: Are there gender differences?Social Science & Medicine, 48, 49-60.
59.
MeltonH. (1999). Police response to domestic violence. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 29, 1-21.
60.
MeltonH. C.BelknapJ. (2003). He hits, she hits: Assessing gender differences and similarities in officially reported intimate partner violence. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 328-348.
61.
MillerS. L. (2005). Victims as offenders. Piscataway. NJ: Rutgers University Press.
62.
OsthoffS. (2002). But, Gertrude, I beg to differ, a hit is not a hit is not a hit: When battered women are arrested for assaulting their partners. Violence Against Women, 8, 1521-1544.
63.
PalssonS.SigurassonB.AevarssonA.OlafsdottirM. (2009). Which symptoms do best predict major depressive disorder (MDD) in males? Results from an Icelandic community study. European Psychiatry, 24, S181-S181.
64.
PleckE. (2004). Domestic tyranny. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
65.
ProsperoM. (2008). The effect of coercion on aggression and mental health among reciprocally violent couples. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 195-202.
66.
ReadJ. G.GormanB. K. (2006). Gender inequalities in US adult health: The interplay of race and ethnicity. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 1045-1065.
67.
RistockJ. L. (2003). Exploring dynamics of abusive lesbian relationships: Preliminary analysis of a multisite, qualitative study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 329.
68.
RomansS.ForteT.CohenM. M.Du MontJ.HymanI. (2007). Who is most at risk for intimate partner violence? A Canadian population-based study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1495-1514.
69.
SalariS. M.BaldwinB. M. (2002). Verbal, physical, and injurious aggression among intimate couples over time. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 523-550.
70.
SillitoC.SalariS. M. (2006, September17). Murder-suicide: Couple characteristics, child outcomes, and community impact 1999-2004. Paper presented at the International Conference on Violence, Abuse, and Trauma, San Diego, CA.
71.
SilvaC.McFarlaneJ.SoekenK.ParkerB.ReelS. (1997). Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in abused women in a primary care setting. Journal of Women’s Health, 6, 543-552.
72.
SmithP. H.EarpJ. A.DeVellisR. F. (1995). Measuring battering: Development of the women’s experience with battering (WEB) Scale. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, & Policy, 1, 273-288.
73.
SokoloffN. J.DupontI. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11, 38-64.
74.
StarkE. (2006). Commentary on Johnson’s “Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence”. Violence Against Women, 12, 1019-1025.
75.
StarkE. (2007). Coercive control. New York, NY: Oxford Univ]ersity Press.
76.
StarkE.FlitcraftA. (1996). Women at risk: Domestic violence and women’s Health. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
StrausM. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
78.
StrausM. A.GellesR. J.SteinmetzS. (1986). The marriage license as a hitting license. In SkolnickA.SkolnickJ. (Eds.), Family in transition: Rethinking marriage, sexuality, child rearing, and family organization (pp. 290-303). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.Boney-McCoyS.SugarmanD. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
81.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute for Justice, Center for Disease Control.
82.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000a). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence. Washington, DC: National Institute for Justice, Center for Disease Control.
83.
TjadenP.ThoennesN. (2000b). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
