This research examines a newspaper sample of men and women who killed multiple people in a single domestic altercation during the years 1993 to 2002. As all these perpetrators of multiple domestic homicide are eligible to be capitally tried, differences in capital sentencing are examined using bivariate statistics and descriptive, case-oriented analyses. Women who kill their children using a knife or firearm are disproportionately sentenced to death, whereas men who kill in the context of a separation are granted leniency in regard to the death penalty. The interaction between the gender of the offender and the crime committed is discussed.
Atwell, M.W. (2002). Equal protection under the law? Gender and justice in the United States. New York: Peter Lang.
2.
Baldus, D.C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C.A. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
3.
Bedau, H.A. (1997). The death penalty in America: Current controversies . New York: Oxford University Press .
4.
Bernat, F. (2001). Gender and the law. In C. Renzetti & L. Goodstein (Eds.), Women, crime, and criminal justice: Original feminist readings (pp. 212-221). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
5.
Best, J. (1999). Random violence: How we talk about new crimes and new victims. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Carroll, J.E. (1996). Images of women and capital sentencing among female offenders: Exploring the outer limits of the Eighth Amendment and articulated theories of justice. Texas Law Review, 75, 1413-1453.
7.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1987). Female offenders: Paternalism reexamined. In L. L. Crites & W. L. Heperle (Eds.), Women, the courts and inequality (pp. 114-139). Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts .
8.
Coker, D. (1992). Heat of passion and wife killing: Men who batter/men who kill. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies , 2, 71-130.
9.
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976).
10.
Daly, K. (1989). Rethinking judicial paternalism: Gender, work-family relations and sentencing. Gender & Society, 3, 9-36.
11.
Daly, K., & Bordt, R. (1991). Gender, race and discrimination research: Disparate meanings of statistical "sex" and "race" effects in sentencing. Flint: University of Michigan.
12.
Dugan, L., Nagin, D.S., & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, women's status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3, 187-214.
13.
Fox, J., & Levin, J. (1998). Multiple homicide: Patterns of serial and mass murder. Crime and Justice, 23, 407-455.
14.
Fox, J., Levin, J., & Quinet, K. (2005). The will to kill: Making sense of senseless murder . Amherst, MA: Pearson Education Group.
15.
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
16.
Gilbert, E. (2001). Women, race, and criminal justice processing. In C. Renzetti & L. Goodstein (Eds.), Women, crime, and criminal justice: Original feminist readings (pp. 222-231). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
17.
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
18.
Hart, B. (1988). Beyond the duty to warn: A therapist's "duty to protect" battered women and children. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 234-248). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Heberle, R. (1999). Disciplining gender; Or, are women getting away with murder? Signs, 24, 1103-1111.
20.
Howarth, J.W. (1992). Review essay: Feminism, lawyering, and death row . Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 2, 401-425.
21.
Jensen, V. (2001). Why women kill: Homicide and gender equality. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
22.
Langford, L., Isaac, N., & Kabat, S. (1998). Homicides related to intimate partner violence in Massachusetts. Homicide Studies, 2, 353-377.
23.
Leonard, E.D. (2001). Convicted survivors: Comparing and describing California's battered women inmates. Prison Journal, 8, 73-86.
24.
Mahoney, M.R. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 49-53.
25.
Mann, C.R. (1996). When women kill. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
Messing, J.T., & Heeren, J.W. (2004). Another side of multiple murder: Women killers in the domestic context. Homicide Studies, 8, 123-158.
27.
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan, 458 U.S. 718 (1982).
28.
Morris, A. (1988). Sex and sentencing. Criminal Law Review, 163, 167-171.
29.
Nagel, I. (1981). Sex differences in the processing of criminal defendants. In A. Morris & L. Gelsthorpe (Eds.), Women and crime (pp. 104-124). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press .
30.
Nagel, I., Cardascia, J., & Ross, C.E. (1982). Sex differences in the processing of criminal defendants. In D. K. Weisenberg (Ed.), Women and the law: A social historical perspective (Vol. I) (pp. 259-282). Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
31.
Nagel, S., & Weitzman, L. (1971). Women as litigants. Hastings Law Journal, 23, 171-198.
32.
Nakell, B., & Hardy, K.A. (1987). The arbitrariness of the death penalty. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
33.
O'Shea, K. (1999). Women and the death penalty in the United States, 1900-1998. Westport, CT: Praeger .
34.
Petee, T.A., Padgett, K.G., & York, T.S. (1997). Debunking the stereotype: An examination of mass murder in public places. Homicide Studies, 1, 317-337.
35.
Peterson, E.S.L. (1999). Murder as self help: Women and intimate partner homicide. Homicide Studies, 3, 30-46.
36.
Pleck, E. (1987). Domestic tyranny: The making of social policy against family violence from Colonial times to the present. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Pritchard, D., & Hughes, K.D. (1997). Patterns of deviance in crime news. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 49-67.
38.
Radelet, M.L. (1981). Racial characteristics and the imposition of the death penalty. American Sociological Review, 46, 918-927.
39.
Rapaport, E. (1990). Some questions about gender and the death penalty. Golden Gate U.L. Law Review, 20, 501-565.
40.
Rapaport, E. (1991). The death penalty and gender discrimination. Law and Society Review, 25, 367-383.
41.
Rapaport, E. (1996). Capital murder and the domestic discount: A study of capital murder in the post-Furman era. SMU Law Review, 49, 1507-1548.
42.
Rapaport, E. (2000). Equality of the damned: The execution of women on the cusp of the 21st century. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 26, 581-600.
43.
Regina v. Mawbridge, 84 Eng. Rep. 1107, 1115 (1707).
44.
Shackelford, T.K. (2001). Partner killing by women in cohabiting relationships . Homicide Studies, 5, 253-266.
45.
Shapiro, A. (2000). Unequal before the law: Men, women, and the death penalty. Am. U.J. Gender, Social Policy, and the Law, 8, 427-470.
46.
Sharp, S.F. (2005). Hidden victims: The effects of the death penalty on families of the accused. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
47.
Silverman, R.A., & Kennedy, L.W. (1988). Women who kill their children. Violence and Victims, 3, 113-127.
48.
Simon, R.J., & Landis, J. (1991). The crimes women commit, the punishments they receive. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
49.
Snell, T.L. (2006). Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin: Capital punishment 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
50.
Snyder, H., Finnegan, T., & Kang, W. (2007). Easy access to the FBI's supplementary homicide reports: 1980-2005. Retrieved October 24, 2008, from http://ojjdp.ncjrs.gov/ojstatbb/ezashr/
51.
Streib, V.L. (1990). Death penalty for female offenders. Cincinnati Law Review, 58, 845-880.
52.
Streib, V.L. (2002). Gendering the death penalty: Countering sex bias in a masculine sanctuary. Ohio State Law Journal, 63, 433-474.
53.
Streib, V.L. (2007). Death penalty for female offenders, January 1, 1973, through December 31, 2007. Retrieved 11/11/2008 from http://www.law.onu.edu/faculty_staff/faculty_profiles/coursematerials/streib/FemDeathDec2007.doc .
54.
Swigert, V.L., & Farrell, R.A. (1977). Normal homicides and the law. American Sociological Review, 42, 16-32.
55.
Temin, C. (1976). Discriminatory sentencing of female offenders: The argument for ERA in a nutshell. In L. Crites (Ed.), The female offenders (pp. 350-357). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56.
Websdale, N. (1999). Understanding domestic homicide. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
57.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). Till death do us part. In J. Radford & D. E. H. Russell (Eds.), Femicide: The politics of woman killing (pp. 83-98). New York: Twayne.
