The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between the use of legal representation and domestic violence civil protection order hearing outcomes. In most jurisdictions, the protection order process has been bureaucratized and carefully structured to facilitate access for victims without legal representation; however, results of an analysis of protection order cases indicates that even with “victim-friendly” procedures and forms, individuals without legal representation are significantly less likely to have their requests for protection orders granted. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of institutional inequalities in the American legal system.
American Bar Association. (1999). Perceptions of the U.S. justice system. Retrieved December 3, 2007, from http://www.abanet.org/media/perception/perceptions.pdf
2.
American Bar Association. (2008). The National Domestic Violence Volunteer Attorney Network Act (S. 1515). Retrieved May 23, 2008, from http://www.abanet.org/domviol/volunteer.html
3.
Balos, B. (2006). Domestic violence matters: The case for appointed counsel in protective order proceedings. Temple Political & Civil Rights Review, 15, 557-602.
4.
Binder, A., & Meeker, J. (1992). The development of social attitudes toward spousal abuse. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Domestic violence: The changing criminal justice response (pp. 3-19). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
5.
Brennan Center for Justice. (2003). Struggling to meet the need: Communities confront gaps in federal legal aid . New York: Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law.
6.
Bridges, G.S., & Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554-570.
7.
Capshew, T.F., & McNeece, C.A. (2000). Empirical studies of civil protection orders in intimate violence: A review of the literature. Journal of Crisis Intervention and Time-Limited Treatment, 30, 117-132.
8.
Cobb, S. (1997). The domestication of violence in mediation. Law & Society Review, 31, 397-440.
9.
Coker, D. (2001). Crime control and feminist law reform in domestic violence law: A critical review. Buffalo Criminal Law Review , 4, 801-860.
10.
Conley, J.M., & O'Barr, W.M. (1990). Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Cramton, R.C. (1994). Delivery of legal services to ordinary Americans . Case Western Reserve Law Review, 44, 531-620.
12.
Czapanskiy, K. (1993). Domestic violence, the family, and the lawyering process: Lessons from studies on gender bias in the courts. Family Law Quarterly, 27, 247-277.
13.
Eigenberg, H., McGuffie, K., Berry, P., & Hall, W.H. (2003). Protective order legislation: Trends in state statutes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 411-422.
14.
Entman, R. (1992). Blacks in the news. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 341-361.
15.
Erwin, T. (2004). When is arrest not an option: The dilemmas of predominant physical aggressor language and the regulation of intimate partner violence. Retrieved May 23, 2008, from http://data.ipharos.com/bwjp/documents/PPAPaper.pdf
16.
Ewick, P., & Silbey, S.S. (1995). Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Towards a sociology of narrative. Law & Society Review, 29, 197-226.
17.
Fischer, K., & Rose, M. (1995). When "enough is enough": Battered women's decision making around court orders of protection. Crime and Delinquency , 41, 414-429.
18.
Greacen, J.M. (2005). Framing the issues for the summit on the future of self-represented litigation. In The future of self-represented litigation: Report from the March 2005 summit (pp. 19-26). National Center for State Courts & State Justice Institute. Retrieved December 8, 2007, from http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/Publications/Res_ProSe_FutSelfRepLitfinalPub.pdf
19.
Harris, R.J., & Cook, C.A. (1994). Attributions about spousal abuse: It matters who the batterers and victims are. Sex Roles, 30, 553-565.
20.
Houseman, A.W., & Perle, L.E. (2007). Securing equal justice for all: A brief history of civil legal assistance in the United States. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. Retrieved December 7, 2007, from http://www.clasp.org/publications/legal_aid_history_2007.pdf
21.
Jamieson, K.H. (1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy . New York: Oxford University Press .
22.
Keilitz, S.L. (1994). Civil protection orders: A viable justice system tool for deterring domestic violence. Violence and Victims , 9, 79-84.
23.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis and oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12-45). Seattle : University of Washington Press.
24.
Lempert, L.B. (1994). A narrative analysis of abuse: Connecting the personal, the rhetorical, and the structural. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 411-440.
25.
Locke, L.M., & Richman, C.L. (1999). Attitudes toward domestic violence: Race and gender issues. Sex Roles, 40, 227-247.
26.
Murphy, W.J. (2001). The victim advocacy and research group: Serving a growing need to provide rape victims with personal legal representation to protect privacy rights and fight gender bias in the criminal justice system . Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 11, 123-138.
27.
Ochberg, R.L. (1994). Life stories and storied lives. In A. Lieblich & R. Josselson (Eds.), Exploring identity and gender: The narrative study of lives (pp. 113-144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Richman, K.D. (2002). Women, poverty, and domestic violence: Perceptions of court and legal aid effectiveness. Sociological Inquiry , 72, 318-344.
29.
Riessman, C.K. (1992). Making sense of marital violence: One woman's narrative. In G. C. Rosenwald & R. L. Ochberg (Eds.), Storied lives: The cultural politics of self-understanding (pp. 231-249). New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
30.
Riessman, C.K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Rhode, D.L. (2001). Access to justice. Fordham Law Review, 69, 1785-1820.
32.
Schneider, E.M. (2000). Battered women and feminist lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
Tittle, C., & Curran, D. (1998). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67, 23-58.
34.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
35.
Trinch, S.L. (2003). Latinas' narratives of domestic abuse: Discrepant versions of violence. Philadelphia: John Benjamin's.
36.
Trinch, S.L., & Berk-Seligson, S. (2002). Narrating in protective order interviews: A source of interactional trouble. Language in Society, 31, 383-418.
37.
Udell, D.S., & Diller, R. (2007). Access to the courts: An essay for the Georgetown University Law Center Conference on the Independence of the Courts. Georgetown University Law Journal, 95, 1127-1154.
38.
Weissman, D.M. (2007). The personal is political-and economic: Rethinking domestic violence. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2007, 387-449.
39.
Weisz, A.N. (1999). Legal advocacy for domestic violence survivors: The power of an informative relationship. Families in Society , 80, 138-147.
