AgrawalNWanDBryanZBoehmlerJMillerMTiwariP. Outcomes analysis of the role of plastic surgery in extremity sarcoma treatment. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013;29(2):107–111. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329920.
BasartHSuttieMIbrahimA, et al. Objectifying micrognathia using three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(8):2106–2109. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS0000000000005056.
6.
BlahnikVSchindelbeckO. Smartphone imaging technology and its applications. Ad Opt Technol. 2021;10(3):145–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/aot-2021-0023.
7.
BooSLBotchuRMcLoughlinE, et al. Sarcoma multidisciplinary team meeting: past, present, and future. Clin Radiol. 2020;75(4):316–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.12.015.
8.
BoschBMansellH. Interprofessional collaboration in health care: lessons to be learned from competitive sports. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2015;148(4):176–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1715163515588106.
9.
BoudreauCWongADuncanAColesJWheelockM. Seeing is not believing: facial distortion in smartphone photography. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;148(4):675e–677e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008360.
10.
BrameCJ. Effective educational videos: principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(4):es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125.
11.
CallanPPWilsonW. A standardised system of photography to assess cosmetic facial surgery. Australas J Plast Surg. 2021;4(2):8–21. https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v4n2.334.
12.
ChenBRPoonEAlamM. Photography in dermatologic surgery: selection of an appropriate lighting solution for a particular clinical application. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(1):106–114. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001303.
DoganISahinOSOzaydinBBaskayaMK. Low-cost stereoscopic recordings of neurologic surgery operative microscopy for anatomic laboratory training. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:240–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.237.
15.
DölenUCÇınarS. Perfect lighting for facial photography in aesthetic surgery: ring light. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016;40(2):319–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0614-0.
FreymannJBKirbyJSPerryJHClunieDAJaffeCC. Image data sharing for biomedical research—meeting HIPAA requirements for de-identification. J Digit Imaging. 2012;25(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9422-x.
20.
GarnierJEwaldJPalenADelperoJRTurriniO. The iPhone, the reflex, and the vinyl record: is the smartphone taking the best intraoperative photographs?J Vis Commun Med. 2021;44(4):151–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2021.1951601.
21.
GaujouxSCeribelliCGoudardG, et al. Best practices to optimize intraoperative photography. J Surg Res. 2016;201(2):402–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.11.048.
22.
Gee KeeELKimbleRMStocktonKA. 3D photography is a reliable burn wound area assessment tool compared to digital planimetry in very young children. Burns. 2015;41(6):1286–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.01.020.
23.
GhabiAAmarSHarionMLegagneuxJVignesJLMathieuL. Microvascular anastomosis using loupes and smartphone magnification: experimental study for application to limited-resource environments. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2020;39(2):92–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2019.11.004.
GrantBDQuangTPossati-ResendeJC, et al. A mobile-phone based high-resolution microendoscope to image cervical precancer. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0211045. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211045.
GuptaASureshAKumarVAnudeepTC. Considerations in choosing the right device for intraoperative video recording in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;149(1):176e–179e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008662.
HallockGG. Smartphone thermal imaging can enable the safer use of propeller flaps. Semin Plast Surg. 2020;34(3):161–164. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714291.
30.
HartingMTDeWeesJMVelaKMKhirallahRT. Medical photography: current technology, evolving issues and legal perspectives. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69(4):401–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12627.
31.
HoutsPSDoakCCDoakLGLoscalzoMJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):173–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004.
32.
HuangEYKnightSGuetterCR, et al. Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: a narrative review. Am J Surg. 2019;218(4):760–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.018.
33.
JinMLBrownMMPatwaDNirmalanAEdwardsPA. Telemedicine, telementoring, and telesurgery for surgical practices. Curr Probl Surg. 2021;58(12):100986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.100986.
KobanKCLeitschSHolzbachTVolkmerEMetzPMGiuntaRE. 3D-imaging and analysis for plastic surgery by smartphone and tablet: an alternative to professional systems?Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2014;46(2):97–104. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1371822.
36.
Koops van’tJagtRTanSLHoeksJ, et al. Using photo stories to support doctor-patient communication: evaluating a communicative health literacy intervention for older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):E3726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193726.
37.
KraushaarJBohnet-JoschkoS. Smartphone use and security challenges in hospitals: a survey among resident physicians in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(24):16546. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416546.
38.
KuangBPenaGSzpakZ, et al. Assessment of a smartphone-based application for diabetic foot ulcer measurement. Wound Repair Regen. 2021;29(3):460–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr12905.
39.
LamJSSimpsonBKLauFH. Health insurance portability and accountability act noncompliance in patient photograph management in plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;82(5):486–492. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001760.
40.
LauCKSchumacherHHAIrwinMS. Patients’ perception of medical photography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(6):e507–e511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.11.005.
41.
LeckenbyJIDeeganRGrobbelaarAO. Complex reconstruction after sarcoma resection and the role of the plastic surgeon: a case series of 298 patients treated at a single center. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(1):59–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001190.
42.
MattessichSGrant-KelsJM. Ethical aspects of the use of photography in clinical medicine. In: PasqualiP, ed. Photography in Clinical Medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2020:75–84.
43.
MorikawaCKobayashiMSatohM, et al. Image and video processing on mobile devices: a survey. Vis Comput. 2021;37(12):2931–2949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-021-02200-8.
44.
NguyenTTVanderWaldeLBellavanceE, et al. Ethical considerations of medical photography in the management of breast disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2801–2806. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6603-6.
45.
NicklausKMWangHBordesMC, et al. Potential of intraoperative 3D photography and 3D visualization in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(10):e3845. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003845.
PrantlLBrandlDCeballosP. A proposal for updated standards of photographic documentation in aesthetic medicine. Plas Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(8):e1389. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001389.
StrunckJLSmartTCBoucherKMSecrestAMGrossmanD. Improved melanoma outcomes and survival in patients monitored by total body photography: a natural experiment. J Dermatol. 2020;47(4):342–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1346-8138.15221.
TranbergHARousBARashbassJ. Legal and ethical issues in the use of anonymous images in pathology teaching and research. Histopathology. 2003;42(2):104–109. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01575.x.
55.
UzunMBülbülMTokerSBeksaçBKaraA. Medical photography: principles for orthopedics. J Ortho Surg Res. 2014;9(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-23.
WeisslerJMSternCSSchreiberJEAmirlakBTepperOM. The evolution of photography and three-dimensional imaging in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(3):761–769. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003146.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.