Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background: While the comprehensive care for joint replacement (CJR) bundled payment program for total joint replacement (TJR) emphasizes value, concerns persist regarding unintended consequences, primarily hospital selection of healthier, younger patients. Purpose: We sought to assess changes in patient characteristics and outcomes after CJR implementation in New York State. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included primary total hip and total knee arthroplasties from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database. Procedures performed before (July 2014 to March 2016; n = 58,610) and after (April 2016 to December 2017; n = 78,728) CJR implementation were compared. Primary outcomes were patient characteristics: Deyo-Comorbidity Index and age. Secondary outcomes were increased hospitalization cost, discharge to institutional post-acute care, and prolonged length of stay. A difference-in-differences analysis estimated changes after CJR implementation, comparing CJR to non-CJR hospitals. Results: We found that CJR implementation (in 49 of 144 New York State hospitals) coincided with slightly older and more comorbid TJR recipients. The CJR program coincided with significantly reduced hospitalization cost and discharge to institutional post-acute care but not length of stay. Some CJR effects appear to have affected non-Medicare patients, as well. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests that in New York State, the CJR bundled payment program did not result in hospitals selecting younger and healthier TJR recipients and coincided with decreased costs and fewer discharges to institutional postacute care.

Keywords

hip arthroplasties knee arthroplasties health policy bundled payments comprehensive care for joint replacement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angrist

Pischke

. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2008.

Austin

. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786.

Barnett

Wilcock

McWilliams

, et al. Two-year evaluation of mandatory bundled payments for joint replacement. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(3):252–262. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1809010.

Dimick

Ryan

. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2401–2402. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.16153.

Dummit

Kahvecioglu

Marrufo

, et al. Association between hospital participation in a Medicare bundled payment initiative and payments and quality outcomes for lower extremity joint replacement episodes. JAMA. 2016;316(12):1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12717.

Ellimoottil

Ryan

Hou

Dupree

Hallstrom

Miller

. Medicare’s new bundled payment for joint replacement may penalize hospitals that treat medically complex patients. Health Affairs. 2016;35(9):1651–1657. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0263.

Finch

Pellegrini

Franklin

, et al. The effects of bundled payment programs for hip and knee arthroplasty on patient-reported outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(4):918–925.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.028.

Finkelstein

Mahoney

Skinner

. Mandatory Medicare bundled payment program for lower extremity joint replacement and discharge to institutional postacute care: interim analysis of the first year of a 5-year randomized trial. JAMA. 2018;320(9):892–900. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.12346.

Haas

Zhang

Kaplan

Song

. Evaluation of economic and clinical outcomes under Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services mandatory bundled payments for joint replacements. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(7):924–931. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0480.

10.

Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Cost-to-charge ratio files. Date unknown. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/costtocharge.jsp 2020. Accessed October 1, 2020.

11.

Kiani

Maron

Zubizarreta

, et al. Hospital-specific total joint arthroplasty casemix and patient flows in the era of payment reform: impact on resource utilization among New York state hospitals. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(suppl 6):S73–S78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.056.

12.

Kim

Grunditz

Meath

THA

Quiñones

Ibrahim

McConnell

. Level of reconciliation payments by safety-net hospital status under the first year of the comprehensive care for joint replacement program. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(2):178–179. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3098.

13.

Kim

Meath

THA

Grunditz

Quiñones

Ibrahim

McConnell

. Characteristics of hospitals exiting the newly voluntary Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement program. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1715–1717. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4743.

14.

Kim

Meath

THA

Quiñones

McConnell

Ibrahim

. Association of Medicare mandatory bundled payment program with the receipt of elective hip and knee replacement in white, black, and Hispanic beneficiaries. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e211772. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1772.

15.

Martin

Nelson

Pelt

. Patient selection in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model. Health Serv Res. 2022;57(1):72–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13880.

16.

Liu

Wilson

Poeran

, et al. Trends in total knee and hip arthroplasty recipients: a retrospective cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44(9):854–859. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2019-100678.

17.

McLawhorn

Buller

. Bundled payments in total joint replacement: keeping our care affordable and high in quality. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(3):370–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9423-6.

18.

Moineddin

Matheson

Glazier

. A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-34.

19.

Plate

Ryan

Black

, et al. No changes in patient selection and value-based metrics for total hip arthroplasty after comprehensive care for joint replacement bundle implementation at a single center. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(8):1581–1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.016.

20.

Quan

Sundararajan

Halfon

, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83.

21.

Ryan

. Medicare bundled payment programs for joint replacement: anatomy of a successful payment reform. JAMA. 2018;320(9):877–879. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.11787.

22.

The Lewin Group. CMS bundled payments for care improvement initiative models 2-4: year 2 evaluation & monitoring annual report. Available at: https://innovation.cms.gov/files/reports/bpci-models2-4-yr2evalrpt.pdf. Published August 2016. Accessed October 1, 2020.

23.

Thirukumaran

Kim

Cai

, et al. Association of the comprehensive care for joint replacement model with disparities in the use of total hip and total knee replacement. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e2111858. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11858.

24.

Walters

Walsh

Smith

Brolin

Azar

Throckmorton

. Bundled payment plans are associated with notable cost savings for ambulatory outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28(19):795–801. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00441.

25.

Warton

Parker

Karter

. How D-I-D you do that? Basic difference-in-differences models in SAS. In: Western Users of SAS Software. SAS Institute; 2016:11.

26.

Warton

Parker

. Oops, I D-I-D it again! Advanced difference-in-differences models in SAS. In: Western Users of SAS Software. SAS Institute; 2018.

27.

Zogg

Falvey

Dimick

Haider

Davis

Grauer

. Changes in discharge to rehabilitation: potential unintended consequences of Medicare total hip arthroplasty/total knee arthroplasty bundled payments, should they be implemented on a nationwide scale? J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(6):1058–1065.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.068.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Did Payment Reform Lead to Patient Selection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasties? An Observational Study Using New York State Data

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material