AvrumovaFMorseKWHeathMWidmannRFLeblDR. Evaluation of k-wireless robotic and navigation assisted pedicle screw placement in adult degenerative spinal surgery: learning curve and technical notes. J Spine Surg. 2021;7(2): 141–154. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-687.
2.
BäckerHCFreibottCEPerkaCWeidenbaumM.Surgeons’ learning curve of renaissance robotic surgical system. Int J Spine Surg. 2020;14(5):818–823. https://doi.org/10.14444/7116.
3.
BuzaJAIIIGoodCRLehmanRAJr, et al. Robotic-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws using the Mazor X Stealth Edition (MXSE) system: workflow and technical tips for safe and efficient use. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01147-723.
4.
DevitoDPKaplanLDietlR, et al. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot. Spine. 2010;35(24):2109–2115.
JainDManningJLordE, et al. Initial single-institution experience with a novel robotic-navigation system for thoracolumbar pedicle screw and pelvic screw placement with 643 screws. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13(5):459-463. https://doi.org/10.14444/6060.
7.
KamJKTGanCDimouS, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery. Asian Spine J. 2019;13(6):920-927. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2019.0033.
8.
KantelhardtSRMartinezRBaerwinkelSBurgerRGieseARohdeV.Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):860–868.
9.
KhanAMeyersJESiasiosIPollinaJ.Next-generation robotic spine surgery: first report on feasibility, safety, and learning curve. Oper Neurosurg. 2018;17(1):61–69.
10.
MalhamGWells-QuinnT.What should my hospital buy next? Guidelines for the acquisition and application of imaging, navigation, and robotics for spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(1):155–165.
11.
SadrameliSSJafraniRStaubBNRadaidehMHolmanPJ.Minimally invasive, stereotactic, wireless, percutaneous pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine: accuracy rates with 182 consecutive screws. Int J Spine Surg. 2018;12(6):650–658.
TsutsumimotoTShimogataMOhtaHMisawaH.Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2009;34(18):1923–1928. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a9d28e.
14.
UrakovTMChangKHBurksSSWangMY.Initial academic experience and learning curve with robotic spine instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(5):E4 https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS175.
15.
VardimanABWallaceDJBooherGA, et al. Does the accuracy of pedicle screw placement differ between the attending surgeon and resident in navigated robotic-assisted minimally invasive spine surgery?J Robotic Surg. 2020;14:567–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
