While clinical trials are essential to improving public health, little research has examined the range of recruitment techniques used or whether they involve behavioral nudges. Behavioral nudges have been defined as “any aspect of the choice architecture [the manner in which options are presented] that alters people's behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives”; these may influence individuals’ autonomy in deciding to participate. To investigate, the study team conducted 39 semi-structured interviews with clinical trial recruiters at two academic medical centers, asking about their recruitment techniques and any perceived ethical concerns. Through inductive qualitative analysis, five main themes emerged: impact of relationships (among recruiters, healthcare teams, and participants), financial compensation, community benefit, study risks and benefits, and personalized study information. The study then assessed whether these techniques were seen as nudges and explored their ethical implications for informed decision-making.
BansbackN.LiL. C.LyndL.BryanS. (2014). Exploiting order effects to improve the quality of decisions. Patient Education and Counseling, 96(2), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.021
BlackL.BatistG.AvardD.RousseauC.DiazZ.KnoppersB. M. (2013). Physician recruitment of patients to non-therapeutic oncology clinical trials: Ethics revisited. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 4, 25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00025
4.
BlagaO. M.FrățilăT. D.MegheaC. I. (2020). Using behavioral nudges to engage pregnant women in a smoking cessation trial: An online field quasi-experiment. Healthcare (Basel), 8(4), 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040531
5.
ChaudhariN.RaviR.GogtayN. J.ThatteU. M. (2020). Recruitment and retention of the participants in clinical trials: Challenges and solutions. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 11(2), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_206_19
6.
DavidM. C.WareR. S. (2014). Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials supports the use of incentives for inducing response to electronic health surveys. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(11), 1210–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.001
7.
Dedoose Version 9.2.12, cloud application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. (2024). SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.dedoose.com
8.
DunnL. B.GordonN. E. (2005). Improving informed consent and enhancing recruitment for research by understanding economic behavior. Jama, 293(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.5.609
9.
FletcherB.GheorgheA.MooreD.WilsonS.DameryS. (2012). Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: A systematic review. BMJ open, 2(1), e000496. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000496
10.
GodskesenT.HanssonM. G.NygrenP.NordinK.KihlbomU. (2015). Hope for a cure and altruism are the main motives behind participation in phase 3 clinical cancer trials. European Journal of Cancer Care, 24(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12184
11.
HansenP. G. (2016). The definition of nudge and libertarian paternalism: Does the hand fit the glove?European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00005468
12.
HoughtonC.DowlingM.MeskellP.HunterA.GardnerH.ConwayA.TreweekS.SutcliffeK.NoyesJ.DevaneD.NicholasJ. R.BiestyL. M. (2020). Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000045.pub2
13.
LargentE. A.LynchH. F. (2017). Paying research participants: Regulatory uncertainty, conceptual confusion, and a path forward. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 17(1), 61.
14.
MadsenS. M.HolmS.RiisP. (2007). Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: An interview study using a grounded theory approach. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(4), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.015255
15.
McCannS.CampbellM.EntwistleV. (2013). Recruitment to clinical trials: A meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies of reasons for participation. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 18(4), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196134831
16.
McGrathG. M. (2023). Using social norm nudges in supermarket shopping trolleys to increase fruit and vegetable purchases. Nutrition Bulletin, 48, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12604
17.
MonginP.CozicM. (2018). Rethinking nudge: Not one but three concepts. Behavioural Public Policy, 2(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.16
18.
MorganS. E.OccaA.MoutonA.PotterJ. (2016). The role of nonverbal communication behaviors in clinical trial and research study recruitment. Health Communication, 32(4), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1140266
19.
MorganS. E.OccaA.PotterJ.MoutonA.PeterM. E. (2017). You need to be a good listener”: Recruiters’ use of relational communication behaviors to enhance clinical trial and research study accrual. Journal of Health Communication, 22(2), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1256356
20.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-andpolicy/ belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html
21.
NewingtonL.MetcalfeA. (2014). Researchers’ and clinicians’ perceptions of recruiting participants to clinical research: A thematic meta-synthesis. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 6(3), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr1619w
22.
NijhawanL. P.JanodiaM. D.MuddukrishnaB. S.BhatK. M.BairyK. L.UdupaN.MusmadeP. B. (2013). Informed consent: Issues and challenges. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, 4(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.116779
OlsenL.DePalmaL.EvansJ. H. (2020). Self-interested and altruistic motivations in volunteering for clinical trials: A more complex relationship. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(5), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/155626462091446
SawyerA.ChhoaC.AyersS.Pushpa-RajahA.DuleyL. (2017). Women's views and experiences of two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: A qualitative study. Trials, 18(1), 422. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2149-3
30.
ShteingartH.NeimanT.LoewensteinY. (2013). The role of first impression in operant learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029550
31.
StrangS.ParkS. Q.StrombachT.KenningP. (2016). Applied economics: The use of monetary incentives to modulate behavior. Progress in Brain Research, 229, 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.06.010
32.
StrujoE.SandersM.FiscellaK.ThomasM.JohnsonB.DeetsA.LucasS.HolderC.JohalT.LuqueN.CassellsA.WilliamsA.TobinS.NJ. (2020). COVID-19 impact on multi-site recruitment and enrollment. Clinical Trials, 17(5), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774520946270
33.
SunsteinC. R. (2018). Misconceptions about nudges. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2(1), 61–67. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3033101
ThalerR. H.SunsteinC. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
36.
TruongT. H.WeeksJ. C.CookE. F.JoffeS. (2011). Altruism among participants in cancer clinical trials. Clinical Trials, 8(5), 616–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774511414444
37.
WrightJ. R.CrooksD.EllisP. M.MingsD.WhelanT. J. (2002). Factors that influence the recruitment of patients to phase III studies in oncology: The perspective of the clinical research associate. Cancer, 95(7), 1584–1591. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10864
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
