Given the unprecedented scale of digital surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic, designing and implementing digital technologies in ways that are equitable is critical now and in future epidemics and pandemics. Yet to date there has been very limited consideration about what is necessary to promote their equitable design and implementation. In this study, literature relating to the use of digital surveillance technologies during epidemics and pandemics was collected and thematically analyzed for ethical norms and concerns related to equity and social justice. Eleven norms are reported, including procedural fairness and inclusive approaches to design and implementation, designing to rectify or avoid exacerbating inequities, and fair access. Identified concerns relate to digital divides, stigma and discrimination, disparate risk of harm, and unfair design processes. We conclude by considering what dimensions of social justice the norms promote and whether identified concerns can be addressed by building the identified norms into technology design and implementation practice.
Access Now (2020). Recommendations on Privacy and Data Protection in The Fight Against COVID-19. Retrieved from accessnow.org.
2.
Ada Lovelace Institute (2020). Exit through the App Store? A rapid evidence review on the technical considerations and societal implications of using technology to transition from the COVID-19 crisis.
AmitM.KimhiH.BaderT.ChenJ.GlassbergE.BenovA. (2020). Mass-surveillance technologies to fight coronavirus spread: The case of Israel. Nature Medicine, 26, 1167–1169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0927-z
5.
ArkseyH.O'MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
6.
ArmstrongR.HallB. J.DoyleJ.WatersE. (2011). ‘Scoping the scope’ of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015%J.Journal of Public Health
BayramM.SpringerS.GarveyC. K.OzdemirV. (2020). COVID-19 digital health innovation policy: A portal to alternative futures in the making. OMICS, 24(8), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2020.0089
9.
BermanG.CarterK.Garcia-HerranzM.SekaraV. (2020). Digital contact tracing and surveillance during COVID-19: General and Child-specific Ethical Issues. UNICEF Office of Research. Innocenti.
BullS.RobertsN.ParkerM. (2015). Views of ethical best practices in sharing individual-level data from medical and public health research: A systematic scoping review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615594767
CharD. S.ShahN. H.MagnusD. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care - addressing ethical challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981–983. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714229
15.
ChunaraR.CookS. H. (2020). Using digital data to protect and promote the most vulnerable in the fight against COVID-19. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00296
16.
CohenI. G.GostinL. O.WeitznerD. J. (2020). Digital smartphone tracking for COVID-19: public health and civil liberties in tension. JAMA, 323(23), 2371–2372. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.8570
17.
CornwallA. (2011). Whose voices? Whose choices? Reflections on gender and participatory development. In CornwallA. (Ed.), The participation reader (pp. 203–223). Zed Books.
18.
CrockerD. A. (2008). Ethics of global development: agency, capability, and deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press.
19.
DubovA.ShoptawbS. (2020). The value and ethics of using technology to contain the COVID-19 epidemic. American Journal of Bioethics, 20(7), W7–W11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1764136
20.
FraserN. (1997). Justice Interruptus critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. Routledge.
21.
FrickerM. (2007). Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
22.
GasserU.IencaM.SchiebnerJ.SleighJ.VayenaE. (2020). Digital tools against COVID-19: Taxonomy, ethical challenges, and navigation aid. Lancet Digital Health2, e425–e434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30137-0
JensenN.KellyA. H.AvendanoM. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need for an equity-focused global health agenda. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00700-x
KahnJ., & Johns Hopkins Project on Ethics and Governance of Digital Contact Tracing Technologies. (2020). Digital contact tracing for pandemic response: ethics and governance guidance. Johns Hopkins University Press.
32.
KelleyM.FerrandR. A.MurayaK.ChiguduS.MolyneuxS.PaiM.BarasaE. (2020). An appeal for practical social justice in the COVID-19 global response in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Global Health, 8(7), e888–e889. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30249-7
LuptonD. (2016). Digital health technologies and digital data: new ways of monitoring, measuring and commodifying human bodies. In OllerosX.ZheguM. (Eds.), Research handbook on digital transformations (pp. 85–102). Edward Elgar.
37.
MacklinR. (2005). Double standards in medical research in developing countries. Cambridge University Press.
NussbaumM. (2000). Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
41.
ParemoerL.NandiS.SeragH.BaumF. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and the social determinants of health. BMJ, 372, n129. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n129
42.
ParkerM. J.FraserC.Abeler-DörnerL.BonsallD. (2020). Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(7), 427. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106314
43.
PerryB. L.AronsonB.PescosolidoB. A. (2021). Pandemic precarity: COVID-19 is exposing and exacerbating inequalities in the American heartland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2020685118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020685118
44.
PowersM.FadenR. (2006). Social justice: the moral foundations of public health and health policy. Oxford University Press.
45.
PowersM.FadenR. (2019). Structural injustice: power, advantage, and human rights. Oxford University Press.
46.
PrattB. (2019a). Constructing citizen engagement in health research priority-setting to attend to dynamics of power and difference. Developing World Bioethics, 19(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12197
47.
PrattB. (2019b). Towards inclusive priority-setting for global health research projects: Recommendations for sharing power with communities. Health Policy and Planning, 34(5), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czz041%J.Health Policy and Planning
RanischR.NijsinghN.BallantyneA.FriedrichO.HendlT.HurstS.MarchmannG.MuntheC.WildV. (2020). Ethics of digital contact tracing apps for the COVID-19 pandemic response. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23149.00485
SantosB. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: justice against epistemicide. Paradigm.
52.
Shaw, J., Chandra, S., Gordon, D., Bickford, J., Fujioka, J., Yang, R., Griffith, J, Gibson, J. & Bhatia, S. (2020). Digital health technologies for more equitable health systems: A discussion paper. Joint Centre for Bioethics at the Unviersity of Toronto.
53.
Spriggs, M., Arnold, M. V., Pearce, C. M., & Fry, C. (2012). Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38, 535–539. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101003
VaithianathanR.RyanR.AnchuginaN.SelveyL.DareT.BrownA. (2020). Digital Contact Tracing for COVID-19: A Primer for Policymakers. Centre for Social Data Analytics: Auckland University of Technology & The University of Queensland.
57.
VenkatapuramS. (2011). Health justice: an argument from the capabilities approach. Polity Press.
WymantC.FerrettiL.TsallisD.CharalambidesM.Abeler-DörnerL.BonsallD.FraserC. (2021). The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 app. Nature, 594(7863), 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z
61.
XafisV.SchaeferG. O.LabudeM. K.ZhuY.HsuL. Y. (2020). The perfect moral storm: diverse ethical considerations in the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Bioeth Rev, 12(2), 65–83.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00125-3
62.
YoungI. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
63.
YoungI. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
