Teaching Vulnerability in Research: A Study of Approaches Utilized by a Sample of Research Ethics Training Programs

Abstract

This article reports the outcomes of qualitative research on the teaching of “vulnerability in research” undertaken with principal investigators of international bioethics training programs funded by the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of the United States. To properly contextualize this research, we begin with an overview of the various ways in which vulnerability has been conceptualized both by writers and by ethical guidance from low-, middle-, and high-income countries. We conclude with some preliminary suggestions for best practice and recommendations for further research. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time research of this kind has been carried out.

Keywords

bioethics vulnerability research ethics ethics training international research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

N. E.

(2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 103, 152-153.

Agarwal

(2003). Voluntariness in clinical research at the end of life. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 25(4), 25-32.

Aggarwal

Gupte

Kass

Taylor

Ali

Bhan

. . . Bollinger

R. C.

(2011). A comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: A randomized study. BMC Medical Education, 11, Article 37.

Armstrong

(2017). An extrinsic dispositional account of vulnerability. Les Ateliers de L’éthique/The Ethics Forum, 12, 180-204.

Barry

O’Callaghan

(2008). Reflexive journal writing: A tool for music therapy student clinical practice development. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 17, 55-66.

Bernard

R. M.

Abrami

P. C.

Lou

Borokhovski

Wade

Wozney

. . . Huang

(2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379-439.

Betts

S. C.

(2008). Teaching and assessing basic concepts to advanced applications: Using Bloom’s taxonomy to inform graduate course design. Proceedings of the Academy of Educational Leadership, 13, 7-11.

Bracken-Roche

Bell

Macdonald

M.E.

Racine

(2017). The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Research Policy Systems, 15, 8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6

Boldt

(2019). The concept of vulnerability in medical ethics and philosophy. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 14, Article 6.

10.

Boyatzis

R.E.

(1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

11.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2014). Ethical conduct for research involving humans (TCPS2). Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/initiatives/tcps2-eptc2/Default/

12.

Coleman

C. H.

(2009). Vulnerability as a regulatory category in human subject research. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 37, 12-18.

13.

Conner

(2008). The importance of knowledge development in bioethics education. In UNESCO Bangkok. In Asia Pacific perspectives on bioethics education (pp. 1-8). Bangkok, Thailand: Author. Retrieved from http://www.eubios.info/APPBE.pdf

14.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (2016). International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Geneva: Author.

15.

DeBruin

(2001). Reflections on “vulnerability.” Bioethics Examiner, 5(2), 1-4.

16.

Delgado Rodriguez

(2017). The relevance of the ethics of vulnerability in bioethics. Les Ateliers de L’éthique/The Ethics Forum, 12, 154-179.

17.

Downie

Clarkeburn

(2005). Approaches to the teaching of bioethics and professional ethics in undergraduate courses. Bioscience Education, 5, 1-19.

18.

DuBois

J. M.

(2006). Vulnerability in research. In Bankert

E. A.

Amdur

R. J.

(Eds.), Institutional review board: Management and function (2nd ed., pp. 337-340). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

19.

DuBois

J.M.

Beskow

Campbell

Dugosh

Festinger

Hartz

James

Lidz

(2012). Restoring balance: a consensus statement on the protection of vulnerable research participants. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 2220-2225.

20.

Dwyer

(2003). Teaching global bioethics. Bioethics, 17, 432-446.

21.

Eckenwiler

L. A.

Ells

Feinholz

Schonfeld

(2008). Hopes for Helsinki: Reconsidering “vulnerability.” Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 765-766.

22.

European Union (EU) Regulation No. 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e7137f5b-e655-11e3-8cd4-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

23.

Goldie

Schwartz

Morrison

(2000). A process evaluation of medical ethics education in the first year of a new curriculum. Medical Education, 34, 468-473.

24.

Goodin

R. E.

(1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Guest

MacQueen

K.M.

(2012). Introduction to applied thematic analysis. In Guest

MacQueen

K.M.

Namey

E.E.

(eds.), Applied thematic analysis (pp. 3-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

26.

Grady

(2009). Vulnerability in research: Individuals with limited financial and/or social resources. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 37, 19-27.

27.

Hébert

P. C.

Meslin

E. M.

Dunn

E. V.

(1992). Measuring the ethical sensitivity of medical students: A study at the University of Toronto. Journal of Medical Ethics, 18, 142-147.

28.

Hébert

P. C.

Meslin

E. M.

Dunn

E. V.

Byrne

Reid

S. R.

(1990). Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: Using vignettes as an instrument. Journal of Medical Ethics, 16, 141-145.

29.

Hoffmaster

(2006). What does vulnerability mean? Hastings Center Report, 36, 38-45.

30.

Howard

McKneally

M. F.

Levin

A. V.

(2010). Integrating bioethics into postgraduate medical education: The University of Toronto model. Academic Medicine, 85, 1035-1040.

31.

Hurst

S. A.

(2008). Vulnerability in research and health care: Describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics, 22, 191-202.

32.

Indian Council of Medical Research. (2017). National ethical guidelines for biomedical and health research involving human participants. Retrieved from https://www.iitm.ac.in/downloads/ICMR_Ethical_Guidelines_2017.pdf

33.

Jackson

V. A.

Back

A. L.

(2011). Teaching communication skills using role-play: An experienced-based guide for educators. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14, 775-780.

34.

Johnson

S. D.

Aragon

S. R.

Shaik

Palma-Rivas

(2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 29-49.

35.

Joyner

Young

(2006). Teaching medical students using role play: Twelve tips for successful role play. Medical Teacher, 28, 225-229.

36.

Kipnis

(2001). Vulnerability in research subjects: A bioethical taxonomy. In Ethical and policy issues involving human participants, Vol. II. Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission.

37.

Kipnis

(2003). Seven vulnerabilities in the pediatric research subject. Theoretical Medicine, 24, 107-120.

38.

Kolb

(1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

39.

Kottow

M. H.

(2003). The vulnerable and the susceptible. Bioethics, 17, 460-471.

40.

Kottow

M. H.

(2004). Vulnerability: What kind of principle is it? Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 7, 281-287.

41.

Kranz

P. L.

Ramirez

S. V.

Lund

N. L.

(2007). The use of psychodrama action techniques in a race relations class. College Student Journal, 41, 1203-1208.

42.

Lange

M. M.

Rogers

Dodds

(2013). Vulnerability in research: A way forward. Bioethics, 27, 333-340.

43.

Levine

(2004). The concept of vulnerability in disaster research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 395-402.

44.

Levine

Faden

Grady

Hammerschmidt

Eckenwiler

Sugarman

(2004). The limitations of “vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 4, 44-49.

45.

Loo

Thorpe

(2002). Using reflective learning journals to improve individual and team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 8, 134-139.

46.

Loue

Loff

(2013). Is there a universal understanding of vulnerability? Experiences with Russian and Romanian trainees in research ethics. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8, 17-27.

47.

Luna

(2009). Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels. International Journal of Feminist Approaches in Bioethics, 2, 121-139.

48.

Luna

(2018). Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability—A way forward. Developing World Bioethics, 2018,1-10. doi:10.111/dewb.12206

49.

Luna

Herissone-Kelly

(2006). Bioethics and vulnerability: A Latin American view. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Editions Rodopi B.V.

50.

Mackenzie

Rogers

Dodds

(2014). Introduction: What is vulnerability, and why does it matter for moral theory? In Mackenzie

Rogers

Dodds

(Eds.), Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 1-29). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

51.

Macklin

(2003). Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection. Bioethics, 17, 472-486.

52.

Martin

A. K.

Tavaglione

Hurst

(2014). Resolving the conflict: Clarifying “vulnerability” in health care ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 24, 51-72.

53.

McKitrick

(2003). A case for extrinsic dispositions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81, 155-174.

54.

Mezirow

(1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quarterly, 32, 3-24.

55.

National Health and Medical Research Council. (2018). National statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007 (updated 2018). Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018

56.

Neff-Smith

Giles

Spencer

E. M.

Fletcher

J. C.

(1997). Ethics program evaluation: The Virginia Hospital ethics fellows example. Healthcare Ethics Committee Forum, 9,375-388.

57.

Nickel

P. J.

(2006). Vulnerable populations in research: The case of the seriously ill. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27, 245-264.

58.

Novack

D. H.

Epstein

R. M.

Paulsen

R. H.

(1999). Toward creating physician-healers: Fostering medical students’ self-awareness, personal growth, and well-being. Academic Medicine, 74, 516-520.

59.

Rogers

Lange

M. M.

(2013). Rethinking the vulnerability of minority populations in research. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 2141-2146.

60.

Rogers

Mackenzie

Dodds

(2012). Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 5, 11-38.

61.

Ross

L. F.

Loup

Nelson

R. M.

Botkin

J. R.

Kist

Smith

G. R.

Jr. Gehlert

(2010). Human subjects protections in community-engaged research: A research ethics framework. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5, 5-17.

62.

Schrems

B. M.

(2014). Informed consent, vulnerability and the risks of group-specific attribution. Nursing Ethics, 21, 829-843.

63.

Shivas

(2004). Contextualizing the vulnerability standard. American Journal of Bioethics, 4, 84-86.

64.

Tavaglione

Martin

Mezger

Durieux

François

Jackson

Hurst

(2015). Fleshing out vulnerability. Bioethics, 29, 98-107.

65.

ten Have

(2015). Respect for human vulnerability: The emergence of a new principle in bioethics. Bioethical Inquiry, 12, 395-408.

66.

ten Have

(2016). Vulnerability: Challenging bioethics. New York, NY: Routledge.

67.

Tong

(2002). Teaching bioethics in the new millennium: Holding theories accountable to actual practices and real people. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 27, 417-432.

68.

Uganda National Council of Science and Technology. (2014, July). National guidelines for research involving humans as research participants. Retrieved from https://uncst.go.ug/guidelines-and-forms/

69.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Part 46.

70.

U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

71.

Weijer

Emanuel

E. J.

(2000). Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science, 289, 1142-1144.

72.

Weisser-Lohmann

(2012). Ethical aspects of vulnerability in research. Poiesis Praxis, 9, 157-162.

73.

Zeidler

D. L.

Walker

K. A.

Ackett

W. A.

Simmons

M. L.

(2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367.

74.

Zion

Gillam

Loff

(2000). The Declaration of Helsinki, CIOMS, and the ethics of research on vulnerable populations. Nature Medicine, 6, 615-617.