Abstract
Introduction
This work aimed at mapping research ethics governance at EMR countries.
Methods
The study used two tools shared with Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) countries. The first enquired about legal provisions and regulatory frameworks, as well as Research Ethics Committee (REC) composition, resources, procedures. The second covered ethical oversight of clinical trials (CTs), including coordination of ethical reviews.
Results
Most respondents (85%) indicated that they have national provisions requiring human subjects’ research to be REC-reviewed. Around half (46%) reported having legal provisions requiring CTs to be registered on a registry; having a national or institution-specific CT registry (43%); and protecting participants from any financial consequences if they suffer injury as result of their participation (54%).
Recommendations
EMR countries are encouraged to develop / foster / accredit national and institution-based RECs, as well as national CT registries. Members of REC committees should have knowledge and skills to ethically review research, in compliance with international standards.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
