This commentary uses personal research ethics experience in South Africa to consider the position of Tsan who recommends a consortium to develop common metrics / performance indicators for determining quality of RECs / IRBs. Terms such as performance, quality and throughput need clarification in research metrics before effective metrics may be useful.
AngellE.Dixon-WoodsM. (2008). Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 130-132. doi:10.1138/jme.2008
2.
BrozekU. M. (2013). Performance measures for Institutional Review Boards (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Illinois at Chicago.
3.
ClarkeD. L. (2014). Auditing the process of ethics approval for Master’s degree at a South African university. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 7, 23-25. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.301
4.
Cleaton-JonesP. (2010). Process error rates in general research applications to the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) at the University of the Witwatersrand: A secondary data analysis. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 3(1), 20-24.
5.
Cleaton-JonesP. (2012). Applications and secretariat workload at the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) 2002-2011: A case study. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 5, 538-544.
6.
Cleaton-JonesP. (2016). What changes are there in decisions by the Wits Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) and in process errors by research applicants between 2003 and 2015?South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 9(2), 69-72. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.2016.v9i2.494
7.
Cleaton-JonesP.GrossmanE. S. (2015). Things may not be as expected: Surprising findings when updating work load at the Wits Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical). South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 8(1), 14-21. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.339
8.
Cleaton-JonesP.VorsterM. (2008). Workload of a South African University-based health research ethics committee in 2003 and 2007. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 1(2), 38-43.
9.
Cleaton-JonesP.WassenaarD. (2010). Protection of human participants in health research—A comparison of some US federal regulations and South African research ethics guidelines. South African Medical Journal, 100, 710-716.
Department of Health. (2004). Ethics in health research: Principles, structures and processes. Pretoria, South Africa: Author.
12.
Department of Health. (2015). Ethics in health research: Principles, processes and structures (2nd ed.). Pretoria, South Africa: Author.
13.
DhaiA.Cleaton-JonesP.TsotsiN. (2011). The ethics of research. In DhaiA.McQuoid-MasonD. (Eds.), Bioethics, human rights and health law: Principles and practice (pp. 166-179). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta and Company.
14.
EmanuelE. J.WendlerD.GradyC. (2008). An ethical framework for biomedical research. In EmanuelE. J.GradyC.CrouchR. A.LieR.MillerF. G.WendlerD. (Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 123-135). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Tsoka-GwegweniJ. M.WassenaarD. (2014). Using the Emanuel et al. framework to assess ethical issues raised by a biomedical research ethics committee in South Africa. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 36-45.
