Research Ethics Committees (RECs) are mandated to protect human participants by conducting ethical reviews of biomedical research. To date, there is a dearth of information on the structure, functioning, and outcomes of RECs in Africa. This article reviews empirical studies investigating African RECs, with the aim of providing an overview of what is known and identifying gaps in our knowledge. We conducted a literature search of the EBSCO, PubMed, and Google Scholar electronic databases. Twenty-three empirical studies reporting on the structure, functions, and outcomes of African RECs were included in our analysis. The review yielded limited systematic data on RECs in Africa. Available empirical evidence suggests that challenges hampering the effective functioning of RECs included lack of membership diversity, scarcity of resources, insufficient training of members, inadequate capacity to review and monitor studies, and lack of national ethics guidelines and accreditation. Relatively little data on the review outcomes of African RECs were described. There is an ongoing need for concerted efforts from various stakeholders to support capacity development and enhancement of African RECs.
AbbottL.GradyC. (2011). A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(1), 3-19.
2.
Abdel-AalW.GhaffarE. A.El ShabrawyO. (2013). Review of the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC), National Research Center of Egypt, 2003-2011. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 29, 1411-1417.
3.
Abou-ZeidA.AfzalM.SilvermanH. J. (2009). Capacity mapping of national ethics committees in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. BMC Medical Ethics, 10, 8. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-10-8
4.
AndandaP.AwahP.NdebeleP.OnigbogiO.UdatinyaD.MwondelaM. (2011). The ethical and legal regulation of HIV-vaccine research in Africa: Lessons from Cameroon, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda and Zambia. African Journal of AIDS Research, 10, 451-463.
5.
AngellE. L.BrymanA.AshcroftR. E. (2008). An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: The ethics/scientific quality boundary examined. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 17, 131-136.
6.
AngellE. L.Dixon-WoodsM. (2009). Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 130-132.
7.
AteudjieuJ.WilliamsJ.HirtleM.BaumeC.IkinguraJ.NiaréA.SprumontD. (2010). Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania. Developing World Bioethics, 10, 88-98.
8.
BenatarS. (2007). Research ethics committees in Africa: Building capacity. PLoS Medicine, 4, 136-142.
9.
BhuttaZ. (2002). Ethics in international health research: A perspective from the developing world. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80, 114-120.
10.
BoatengO.NdebeleP.Mwesiga-KayongoD. (2014). On-going monitoring of research post REC approval. In KrugerM.NdebeleP.HornL. (Eds.), Research ethics in Africa: A resource for research ethics committees (1st ed., pp. 47-53). Stellenbosch, South Africa: Sun Media Stellenbosch.
11.
Cleaton-JonesP. (2010). Process error rates in general research applications to the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) at the University of the Witwatersrand: A secondary data analysis. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 3(1), 20-24.
12.
Cleaton-JonesP. (2012). Applications and secretariat workload at the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) 2002-2011: A case study. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 5(1), 38-44.
13.
Cleaton-JonesP.VorsterM. (2008). Workload of a South African university-based health research ethics committee in 2003 and 2007. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 1(2), 38-42.
14.
Cleaton-JonesP.WassenaarD. (2010). Protection of human participants in health research—A comparison of some US federal regulations and South African research ethics guidelines History of research ethics committees in South Africa. South African Medical Journal, 100, 710-716.
15.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (2002). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
16.
Department of Health (South Africa). (2004). Ethics in health research: Principles, structures and processes. Pretoria: Author.
17.
EmanuelE.WendlerD.KillenJ.GradyC. (2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 189(5), 930-937.
18.
GlickmanS. W.McHutchisonJ. G.PetersonE. D.CairnsC. B.HarringtonR. A.CaliffR. M.SchulmanK. A. (2009). Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 816-823.
HendersonG. E.CorneliA. L.MahoneyD. B.NelsonD. K.MwansamboC. (2007). Applying research ethics guidelines. The view from a Sub-Saharan research ethics committee. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(2), 41-48.
21.
HyderA. A.WaliS. A.KhanA. N.TeohN. B.KassN. E.DawsonL. (2004). Ethical review of health research: A perspective from developing country researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(1), 68-72.
22.
HyderA. A.ZafarW.AliJ.SsekubuguR.NdebeleP.KassN. (2013). Evaluating institutional capacity for research ethics in Africa: A case study from Botswana. BMC Medical Ethics, 14(1), 31. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-14-31
23.
IJsselmuidenC.MaraisD.WassenaarD.Mokgatla-MoipolaiB. (2012). Mapping African ethical review committee activity onto capacity needs: The MARC initiative and HRWEB’s interactive databases of RECs in Africa. Developing World Bioethics, 12(2), 74-86.
24.
IkinguraJ. K. B.KrugerM.ZelekeW. (2007). Health research ethics review and needs of institutional ethics committees in Tanzania. Tanzania Health Research Bulletin, 9, 154-158.
25.
KassN. E.HyderA. A.AjuwonA.Appiah-PokuJ.BarsdorfN.ElsayedD. E.. . . TindanaP. (2007). The structure and function of research ethics committees in Africa: A case study. PLoS Medicine, 4(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040003
26.
KirigiaJ. M.WambebeC.Baba-MoussaA. (2005). Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region. BMC Medical Ethics, 6, 10. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-6-10
27.
KlitzmanR. (2008). Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees. Developing World Bioethics, 8, 207-218.
28.
LangatS. K. (2005). Reuse of samples: Ethical issues encountered by two institutional ethics review committees in Kenya. Bioethics, 19, 537-549.
29.
LangloisA. (2011). The Global Governance of Bioethics: Negotiating UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005). London, England: Routledge.
30.
MatarA.SilvermanH. (2013). Perspectives of Egyptian research ethics committees regarding their effective functioning. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(1), 32-44.
31.
MilfordC.WassenaarD.SlackC. (2006). Resources and needs of research ethics committees in Africa: Preparations for HIV vaccine trials. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 2(2), 1-9.
32.
MoodleyK.MyerL. (2007). Health Research Ethics Committees in South Africa 12 years into democracy. BMC Medical Ethics, 8, 1. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-8-1
33.
MoodleyK.RennieS. (2011). Advancing Research Ethics Training in Southern Africa (ARENSA). South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 4, 104-105.
34.
MusesengwaR. (2014). Safety and adverse event monitoring. In KrugerM.NdebeleP.HornL. (Eds.), Research ethics in Africa: A resource for research ethics committees (1st ed., pp. 41-45). Stellenbosch, South Africa: Sun Media Stellenbosch.
35.
National Council for Science and Technology. (2004). Guidelines for ethical conduct of biomedical research involving human subjects in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
36.
NdebeleP.WassenaarD.BenatarS.FleischerT.KrugerN.AdebamowoC.. . . MeslinE. (2014). Research ethics capacity building in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of NIH Fogarty funded programs 2000-2012. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(2), 24-40.
37.
NyikaA.KilamaW.ChilengiR.TangwaG.TindanaP.NdebeleP.IkinguraJ. (2009). Composition, training needs and independence of ethics review committees across Africa: Are the gate-keepers rising to the emerging challenges?Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 189-193.
38.
NyikaA.KilamaW.TangwaG. B.ChilengiR.TindanaP. (2009). Capacity building of ethics review committees across Africa based on the results of a comprehensive needs assessment survey. Developing World Bioethics, 9, 149-156.
39.
OyedejiK. S. (2011). A study of the needs and resources of health research ethics committees in South Western Nigeria (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
RiveraR.EzcurraE. (2001). Composition and operation of selected research ethics review committees in Latin America. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 23(5), 9-12.
42.
RwabihamaJ.GirreC.DuguetA. (2010). Committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: Which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36, 243-250.
43.
SatharA.DhaiA.van der LindeS. (2013). Collaborative international research: Ethical and regulatory issues pertaining to human biological materials at a South African institutional research ethics committee. Developing World Bioethics, 14, 150-157. doi:10.1111/dewb.12018
44.
SilvermanH.EdwardsH.ShamooA.MatarA. (2013). Enhancing research ethics capacity in the Middle East: Experience and challenges of a Fogarty-sponsored training program. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(5), 40-51.
45.
SilvermanH.HullS. C.SugarmanJ. (2001). Variability among institutional review boards’ decisions within the context of a multicenter trial. Critical Care Medicine, 29, 235-241.
46.
SleemH.El-KamaryS. S.SilvermanH. J. (2010). Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt. BMC Medical Ethics, 11, 12. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-11-12
47.
StairT. O.ReedC. R.RadeosM. S.KoskiG.CarmagoC. A. (2001). Variation in Institutional Review Board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial. Academic Emergency Medicine, 8, 636-641.
48.
TolichM. (2014). How idiocultures and warrants operate independently in New Zealand ethics review boards. Research Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1747016114542546
49.
Tsoka-GwegweniJ.WassenaarD. R. (2014). Using the Emanuel framework to examine ethical issues raised by a biomedical research ethics committee in South Africa. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 36-45. doi:10.1171/1556264614553172
50.
WassenaarD. (2011). South African Research Ethics Training Initiative (SARETI). South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 4, 107-108.
51.
World Health Organization. (2011). Standards and operational guidance for ethics review of health-related research with human participants. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
