The purpose of the present study was to describe the degree to which parents of adolescents were willing to grant consent for their teenagers’ participation in sexually themed research, and to link the likelihood of consent to parents’ demographics, personality traits, parenting, attitudes, and their children’s characteristics. A total of 203 parents of adolescents ages 13 to 18 years anonymously responded to an internet survey (81.7% mothers; 87% European American). Approximately 40% of respondents were possibly willing and 36% were definitely willing to provide consent for a hypothetical study covering all included sexual health topics. Parents were more likely to give consent if they were highly extraverted, viewed science positively, were not highly conservative about sexuality, and if they thought their teenager was already sexually experienced. Overall, many parents appear to be quite open to adolescent survey participation.
AndermanC.CheadleA.CurryS.DiehrP.ShultzL.WagnerE. (1995). Selection bias related to parental consent in school-based survey research. Evaluation Review, 19, 663-674. doi:10.1177/0193841X9501900604
2.
BakerL.LavenderT.TincelloD. (2005). Factors that influence women’s decisions about whether to participate in research: An exploratory story. Birth, 32, 60-66. doi:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00346.x
3.
BiggarR. J.MelbyeM. (1992). Responses to anonymous questionnaires concerning sexual behavior: A method to examine potential biases. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 1506-1512. doi:10.2105/AJPH.82.11.1506
4.
Brooks-GunnJ. (1990). Overcoming barriers to adolescent research on pubertal and reproductive development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 425-440. doi:10.1007/BF01537472
5.
Center for Human Resource Research. (2002). NLSY79 child & young adult data users guide: A guide to the 1986–2000 child data and 1994–2000 young adult data. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
6.
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1991). Parent–teacher involvement questionnaire: Parent version. Available from http://www.fasttrackproject.org
7.
CopasA. J.JohnsonA. M.WadsworthJ. (1997). Assessing participation bias in a sexual behavior survey: Implications for measuring HIV risk. AIDS, 11, 783-790. doi:10.1097/00002030-199706000-00011
8.
Corbie-SmithG.ThomasS. B.WilliamsM. V.Moody-AyersS. (1999). Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14, 537-546. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07048.x
9.
CrawfordM.PoppD. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13-26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163
10.
DaviesC.RobinsonK. (2010). Hatching babies and stork deliveries: Risk and regulation in the construction of children’s sexual knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11, 249-262. doi:10.2304/ciec.2010.11.3.249
11.
DentC. W.GalaifJ.SussmanS.StacyA.BurtunD.FlayB. R. (1993). Demographic, psychosocial and behavioral differences in samples of actively and passively consented adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 18, 51-56. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(93)90008-W
12.
DornbuschS. M.CarlsmithJ. M.BushwallS. J.RitterP. L.LiedermanH.HastorfA. H.GrossR. T. (1985). Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents. Child Development, 56, 326-341. doi:10.2307/1129723
13.
DunneM. P.MartinN. G.BaileyJ. M.HeathA. C.BucholzK. K.MaddenP. A. F.StathamD. J. (1997). Participation bias in a sexuality survey: Psychological and behavioural characteristics of responders and non-responders. International Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 844-854. doi:10.1093/ije/26.4.844
14.
EdwardsL. M.FehringR. J.JarrettK. M.HaglundK. A. (2008). The influence of religiosity, gender, and language preference acculturation on sexual activity among Latino/a adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30, 447-462. doi:10.1177/0739986308322912
15.
EisenbergM. E.BernatD. H.BearingerL. H.ResnickM. D. (2008). Support for comprehensive sexuality education: Perspectives from parents of school-age youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 352-359. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.019
16.
EndersC. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128-141. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0801_7
17.
EsbensenF.-A.MillerM. H.TaylorT. J.HeN.FrengA. (1999). Differential attrition rates and active parental consent. Evaluation Review, 23, 316-335. doi:10.1177/0193841X9902300304
18.
FarringdonF.HolgateC.McIntyreF.BulsaraM. (2014). A level of discomfort! Exploring the relationship between maternal sexual health knowledge, religiosity and comfort discussing sexual health issues with adolescents. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11, 95-103. doi:10.1007/s13178-013-0122-9
19.
FieldsJ.TolmanD. L. (2006). Risky business: Sexuality education and research in U.S. schools. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 3, 63-76. doi:10.1525/srsp.2006.3.4.63
20.
GeaslerM. J.DannisonL. L.EdlundC. J. (1995). Sexuality education of young children: Parental concerns. Family Relations, 44, 184-188. doi:10.2307/584807
21.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
22.
HalpernC. T.UdryJ. R.SuchindranC. (1994). Effects of repeated questionnaire administration in longitudinal studies of adolescent males’ sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 41-57. doi:10.1007/BF01541617
23.
HenryK.SmithE. A.HopkinsA. (2002). The effect of active parental consent on the ability to generalize the results of an alcohol, tobacco, and other drug prevention trial to rural adolescents. Evaluation Review, 26, 645-655. doi:10.1177/019384102237853
24.
KuyperL.de WitJ.AdamP.WoertmanL. (2012). Doing more good than harm? The effects of participation in sex research on young people in the Netherlands. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 497-506. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9780-y
25.
LewisR. (2009). Recruiting parents and children into a research project: A qualitative exploration of families’ decision-making processes. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 405-419. doi:10.1080/13645570802289104
26.
LiddonN.MichaelS. L.DittusP.MarkowitzL. E. (2013). Maternal underestimation of child’s sexual experience: Suggested implications for HPV vaccine uptake at recommended ages. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 674-676. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.026
27.
LönnqvistJ.-E.PaunonenS.VerkasaloM.LeikasS.Tuulio-HenrikssonA.LönnqvistJ. (2007). Personality characteristics of research volunteers. European Journal of Personality, 21, 1017-1030. doi:10.1002/per.655
28.
MarcusB.SchützA. (2005). Who are the people reluctant to participate in research? Personality correlates of four different types of nonresponse as inferred from self- and observer ratings. Journal of Personality, 73, 959-984. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00335.x
29.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
30.
NickellG. S. (1998, August). The helping attitude scale. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
31.
OgleS.GlasierA.RileyS. (2008). Communication between parents and their children about sexual health. Contraception, 77, 283-288. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2007.12.003
32.
OttM. A.RosenbergerJ. D.FortenberryJ. D. (2010). Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5, 57-64. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.57
33.
RegnerusM. D. (2005). Talking about sex: Religion and patterns of parent-child communication about sex and contraception. The Sociological Quarterly, 46, 79-105. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00005.x
34.
TiggesB. B. (2003). Parental consent and adolescent risk behavior research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35, 283-289. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00283.x
WestS. G.TaylorA. B.WuW. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209-231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
37.
YatesG. C. R.ChandlerM. (2000). Where have all the skeptics gone? Patterns of new age beliefs and anti-scientific attitudes in preservice primary teachers. Research in Science Education, 30, 377-387. doi:10.1007/BF02461557
38.
ZillN. (1990). Behavior Problems Index based on parent report (Publication No. 9103). Washington, DC: Child Trends.
