Opt-Out Parental Consent in Online Surveys: Ethical Considerations

Abstract

This article aims to foster discussion and debate around seeking parental consent from young people recruited online. The growth of social media, particularly for young people, has led to increased interest in young people’s online activities as both a research topic and recruitment setting. In a health-related study, which sought to recruit young people aged 13 to 18 years old from YouTuber fan communities to an online survey, the question arose of how parental consent could be sought from young people below 16 when no link existed between researcher and parents/guardians. A practical strategy is proposed which combines novel communication methods for participant information, opt-out online consent and age verification to address this issue. Strengths and limitations of these approaches are discussed.

Keywords

opt-out consent parental consent online research ethics young people

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderson

Morrow

(2004). Ethics, social research and consulting with children and young people. Basingstoke, UK: Barnardos.

Altshuler

A. L.

Gerns Storey

H. L.

Prager

S. W.

(2015). Exploring abortion attitudes of US adolescents and young adults using social media. Contraception, 91, 226-233. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.009

Bagnall

(1998). Use of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drugs amongst 13-year-olds in three areas of Britain. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 22, 241-251.

Barbovschi

Green

Vandoninck

(2013). Innovative approaches for investigating how children understand risk in new media: Dealing with methodological and ethical challenges. London, UK: EU Kids Online.

Bollard

Maubach

Walker

Ni Mhurchu

(2016). Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people’s predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: An experimental study International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, Article 95. doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0421-7

boyd

(2008). Why youth heart social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In Buckingham

(Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119-142). Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

British Medical Association. (2011). Consent, rights and choices in health care for children and young people. London, England: Author.

British Psychological Society. (2013). Ethics guidelines for Internet-mediated research. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.

Buchanan

Hvizdak

(2009). Online survey tools: Ethical and methodological concerns of human research ethics committees. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 4(2), 37-48.

10.

Buchanan

Zimmer

(2012). Internet research ethics. In Zalta

E. N.

(Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-internet-research/

11.

Buckingham

(2008). Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

12.

Cabinet Office. (2014). Risk behaviours and negative outcomes. London, England: Cabinet Office.

13.

Caroll

J. A.

Kirkpatrick

R. L.

(2011). Impact of social media on adolescent behavioral health. Oakland, CA: California Adolescent Health Collaborative.

14.

Carrotte

E. R.

Dietze

P. M.

Wright

C. J.

Lim

M. S.

(2016). Who “likes” alcohol? Young Australians’ engagement with alcohol marketing via social media and related alcohol consumption patterns. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 40, 474-479. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12572

15.

Cranwell

Whittamore

Britton

Leonardi-Bee

(2016). Alcohol and tobacco content in UK video games and their association with alcohol and tobacco use among young people. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19, 426-434. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0093

16.

Crow

Wiles

Heath

Charles

(2006). Research ethics and data quality: The implications of informed consent. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 83-95. doi:10.1080/13645570600595231

17.

Ellison

N. B.

Boyd

(2013). Sociality through social network sites. In Dutton

W. H.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Internet studies (pp. 151-172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

18.

Farmer

Porcellato

(2016). “Thinking about drinking”: Exploring children’s perceptions of alcohol using the Draw and Write tool. Health Education, 116, 541-560.

19.

Germain

Harris

Mackay

Maxwell

(2017). Why should we use online research methods? Four doctoral health student perspectives. Qualitative Health Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1049732317721698

20.

Hagell

Coleman

(2014). Young people’s health: Update 2014. London, England: Association for Young People’s Health.

21.

Hagger

Trawley

Hendrieckx

Browne

J. L.

Cameron

Pouwer

. . . Speight

(2016). Diabetes MILES Youth-Australia: Methods and sample characteristics of a national survey of the psychological aspects of living with type 1 diabetes in Australian youth and their parents. BMC Psychology, 4, Article 42. doi:10.1186/s40359-016-0149-9

22.

Hammond

White

Anderson

Arnott

Dockrell

(2014). The perceptions of UK youth of branded and standardized, “plain” cigarette packaging. European Journal of Public Health, 24, 537-543. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckt142

23.

Hewison

Haines

(2006). Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research. British Medical Journal, 333, 300-302. doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7562.300

24.

Ito

Baumer

Bittani

boyd

Cody

Herr-Stephenson

. . . Tripp

(2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

25.

James

Davis

Flores

Francis

J. M.

Pettingill

Rundle

Gardner

(2009). Young people, ethics, and the new digital media: A synthesis from the goodplay project. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

26.

Junghans

Modersohn

Dorner

Neudecker

Haase

Schwenk

(2006). Systematic evaluation of different approaches for minimizing hemodynamic changes during pneumoperitoneum. Surgical Endoscopy, 20, 763-769. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-2231-2

27.

Livingstone

Smith

P. K.

(2014). Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: The nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 635-654. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12197

28.

Lobe

Livingstone

Haddon

(2007). Researching children’s experiences online across countries: Issues and problems in methodology. London, England: EU Kids Online.

29.

Markham

Buchanan

(2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). Retrieved from https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

30.

Martorana

(2015). Characteristics and associated factors of non-suicidal self-injury among Italian young people: A survey through a thematic website. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4, 93-100. doi:10.1556/2006.4.2015.001

31.

Medical Research Council. (2004). MRC ethics guide: Medical research involving children. London, England: Medical Research Council.

32.

Miller

Costa

Haynes

McDonald

Nicolescu

Sinanan

. . . Wang

(2016). How the world changed social media. London, England: University College London.

33.

Moodie

Ford

Mackintosh

A. M.

Hastings

(2012). Young people’s perceptions of cigarette packaging and plain packaging: An online survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14, 98-105. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr136

34.

National Children’s Bureau. (2011). Guidelines for research with children and young people. London, England: National Children’s Bureau.

35.

National Society for the Protection of Children. (2012). NSPCC research ethics committee: Guidance for applicants. London, England: NSPCC.

36.

Nind

Wiles

Bengry-Howell

Crow

(2013). Methodological Innovation and research ethics: Forces in tension or forces in harmony? Qualitative Research, 13, 650-667.

37.

Ofcom. (2014). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. London, England: Ofcom.

38.

Ofcom. (2016). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. London, England: Ofcom.

39.

Office for National Statistics. (2015). Internet access—Households and individuals, 2015. Cardiff, UK: ONS.

40.

Office for National Statistics. (2016). Home Internet and social media usage. Cardiff, UK: ONS.

41.

Roberts

(2015). Ethical Issues in conducting qualitative research in online communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12, 314-325.

42.

Royal College of Nursing. (2011). Informed consent in health and social care research: RCN guidance for nurses (2nd ed.). London, England: Royal College of Nursing.

43.

Spears

B. A.

Taddeo

C. M.

Daly

A. L.

Stretton

Karklins

L. T.

(2015). Cyberbullying, help-seeking and mental health in young Australians: Implications for public health. International Journal of Public Health, 60, 219-226. doi:10.1007/s00038-014-0642-y

44.

Spence

White

Adamson

A. J.

Matthews

J. N.

(2015). Does the use of passive or active consent affect consent or completion rates, or dietary data quality? Repeat cross-sectional survey among school children aged 11-12 years. BMJ Open, 5(1), e006457. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006457

45.

Stead

McDermott

MacKintosh

A. M.

Adamson

(2011). Why healthy eating is bad for young people’s health: Identity, belonging and food. Social Science & Medicine, 72, 1131-1139. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.029

46.

Stern

S. R.

(2004). Studying adolescents online: A consideration of ethical issues. In Buchanan

(Ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies (pp. 274-287). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

47.

Tigges

B. B.

(2003). Parental consent and adolescent risk behavior research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35, 283-289.