Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This case examines a district heavily reliant on local revenue proposing a referendum for a new operating fund mill levy in a politically polarized community. Voters try to leverage their approval as a way to force the district to make decisions that align with their beliefs. The divided community, with some arguing for increasing and some for eliminating equity initiatives, creates a challenge for the district. Aspiring district and school leaders can use this case to explore how to talk to their community about school finance topics, determine levels of fiscal transparency, and navigate polarized voters.

Keywords

school funding referendum political polarization school community relationships school community trust district messaging transparency case study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvord

Rauscher

(2021). Minority support: School district demographics and support for funding election measures. Urban Affairs Review, 57(3), 643–674.

Auerbach

(2007). Visioning parent engagement in urban schools. Journal of School Leadership, 17(6), 699–734.

Baron

E. J.

(2022). School spending and student outcomes: Evidence from revenue limit elections in Wisconsin. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(1), 1–39.

Batt

Lewis

. (in press). Reaching the fiscal cliff: Including the community in making hard budget and resource decisions. In Schilling

N.V.

Schilling

N.S.

(Eds.), Problems of practice: Case studies of the superintendency. Emerald Publishing.

Bowers

A. J.

Lee

(2013). Carried or defeated? Examining the factors associated with passing school district bond elections in Texas, 1997-2009. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 732–767.

Braidwood

(2019). You want to spend my money how? Framing effects on tax increases via ballot propositions. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 19(1), 29–52.

Brecklin

C. I.

(2022). District at the edge: Policy, community, place and belonging in a school closure debate [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI]. https://asset.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/6YXBPJ3KPV2RY87/R/file-5dd38.pdf

Brezicha

K. F.

Arnzen

C. J.

LoBue

Childs

Germain

Jenkins

D. A.

Douglass

(2023). Political polarization of educational politics and its implications for democratic education. Peabody Journal of Education, 98(5), 467–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2023.2261303

Brunner

E. J.

Robbins

M. D.

Simonsen

(2018). Information, tax salience, and support for school bond referenda. Public Budgeting & Finance, 38(4), 52–73.

10.

Brunner

E. J.

Robbins

M. D.

Simonsen

(2021). Property tax information and support for school bond referenda: Experimental evidence. Public Administration Review, 81(3), 488–499.

11.

Bynoe

Bounds

Martínez

D. G.

(2023). The essentials of finance for school leaders: A practical handbook for problem-solving and meeting challenges. Rowman & Littlefield.

12.

Chappelow

Reznikov

(2007). Rebuilding trust and relationships between your community and school district. Journal of School Public Relations, 28(4), 307–317.

13.

Coburn

C. E.

(2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.

14.

Dee

T. S.

(2023). Where the kids went: Nonpublic schooling and demographic change during the pandemic exodus from public schools. Teachers College Record, 125(6), 119–129.

15.

Ehrenberg

R. G.

Ehrenberg

R. A.

Smith

C. L.

Zhang

(2004). Why do school district budget referenda fail? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(2), 111–125.

16.

Faubert

B. C.

(2019). Transparent resource management: Implications for leadership and democracy in education. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(5), 965–978.

17.

Ganon-Shilon

Schechter

(2017). Making sense of school leaders’ sense-making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 682–698.

18.

Gong

Rogers

C. L.

(2014). Does voter turnout influence school bond elections? Souther Economic Journal, 81(1), 247–262.

19.

Hodge

E. M.

López

F. A.

Rosenberg

J. M.

(2022). How to respond to community concerns about critical race theory. Phi Delta Kappan, 104(3), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221136599

20.

Hutchings

G. C.

Jr. Brown

J. L.

(2021). The current work of the American superintendent. In Tienken

C. H.

(Ed.), The American Superintendent (pp. 39–49). Rowman Littlefield.

21.

Ingle

W. K.

Johnson

P. A.

Givens

M. R.

Rampelt

(2013). Campaign expenditures in school levy referenda and their relationship to voter approval: Evidence from Ohio, 2007–2010. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(1), 41–76.

22.

Jochim

Diliberti

M. K.

Schwartz

Destler

Hill

(2023). Navigating political tensions over schooling: Findings from the Fall 2022 American School District Panel Survey. Center on Reinventing Public Education.

23.

Koyama

Kania

(2016). Seeing through transparency in education reform: Illuminating the “local.” Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(91), n91.

24.

Lewis

A. E.

Diamond

J. B.

(2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.

25.

LoBue

Douglass

(2023). When white parents aren’t so nice: The politics of anti-CRT and anti-equity policy in post-pandemic America. Peabody Journal of Education, 98(5), 548–561.

26.

Roza

(2010). Educational economics: Where do school funds go? Urban Institute.

27.

Roza

Knight

D. S.

(2022). Behold the role of the district in education finance. Peabody Journal of Education, 97(4), 391–394.

28.

Tyack

Hansot

(1981). Conflict and consensus in American public education. Daedalus, 110(3), 1–25.

“I Won’t Pay for Schools That Don’t Do What I Want”: Navigating Community Trust and Beliefs to Maintain District Fiscal Stability in the Midst of Political Polarization

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References