In an effort to scale success, many schools codify various practices to replicate them across schools. While such codification and replication can help scale success, scaling success often comes with numerous negative externalities such as a reduction of autonomy and burdens on successful educators. Based on real events and educators, this case follows an instructional coach through his career at a charter school as it attempts to scale a successful small charter school to a larger Charter Management Organization (CMO).
BassB. (2010). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Simon & Schuster.
2.
BiestaG. J. (2012). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2), 35–49.
3.
BlanchardK.ZigarmiP.ZigarmiD. (2013). Leadership and the one minute manager: Increasing effectiveness through Situational Leadership II. William Morrow.
CrawfordJ. R. (2001). Teacher autonomy and accountability in charter schools. Education and Urban Society, 33(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124501332007
7.
CunliffeA. L.EriksenM. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64, 1425–1449.
8.
FrostD. (2012). From professional development to system change: Teacher leadership and innovation. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.657861
9.
GolannJ. W. (2021). Scripting the moves: Culture & control in a “no-excuses” charter school. Princeton University Press.
10.
GrantA.HannT.GodwinR.ShackelfordS.AmesT. (2020). A framework for graduated teacher autonomy. Linking teacher proficiency with autonomy. The Educational Forum, 84(2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1700324
11.
HeifetzR. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Belknap Press.
12.
HeifetzR. A.GrashowA.LinskyM. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business School Press.
13.
IngersollR. M. (2009). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Harvard University Press.
14.
KotterJ. P. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. Free Press.
15.
KottermanJ. (2006). Leadership vs management: What’s the difference?Journal for Quality & Participation, 29(2), 13–17.
16.
LidenR. C.PanacioA.HuJ.MeuserJ. D. (2014). Servant leadership: Antecedents, consequences, and contextual moderators. In DayD. V. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 357–379). Oxford University press.
17.
LyleA. M.PeurachD. J. (2024). Changing notions of teacher autonomy: The intersection of teacher autonomy and instructional improvement in the US. Research in Education, 118(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237211055843
McCluskeyM. S. (2023b). Turnover contagion: Trust and the compounding impact of turnover on teachers. Journal of School Choice, 17(4), 563–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2022.2151923
20.
McCluskeyM. S. (2024a). A dry pipeline: CMO teacher hiring in an uncertain teacher labor market. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2024.2312994
21.
McCluskeyM. S. (2024b). Leave like a champion: Teacher embeddedness and turnover at an urban “no-excuses” charter management organization. Journal of Education, 204(3), 576–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574231190925
22.
McCluskeyM. S. (2024c). Scaling toward utopia or dystopia: Challenges to preserving organizational values through growth. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 27(3), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554589241238902
23.
McCluskeyM. S.NarayananM. (2024). Black movement in white spaces: How youth online protests challenge “no excuses” charter practices. In JohnsonD. D.LovettM. D.LipschultzJ. H. (Eds.), Race, Africana communication, and criminal justice reform: A reflective and intersectional analysis of adaptive vitality.
24.
MironG.GulosinoC.ShankC.ElgeberiN.DavidsonC.Hernandez de AlvarezF.JurdzyB.LarsenJ.PhamD.RuderK.UrdapilletaL.UrshelJ. (2021). Profiles of for-profit and nonprofit education management organizations (15th ed.). National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/emo-profiles-fifteenth-ed
25.
NarayananM.McCluskeyM. S. (2023). #BlackatCMO: Challenging charter schools through youth Instagram counterstories. Education, Citizenship & Social Justice, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979231206941
26.
NorthouseP. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage.
27.
PearsonL. C.MoomawW. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 38–54.
28.
ScottJ. T.DiMartinoC. (2010). Hybridized, franchised, duplicated, and replicated: Charter schools and management organizations. In LubienskiC. A.WeitzelP. C. (Eds.), The charter school experiment: Expectations, evidence, and implications (pp. 171–196). Harvard Education Press.
29.
TorresA. C. (2014). “Are we architects or construction workers?” Re-examining teacher autonomy and turnover in charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(124), 1–26.
30.
WoodworthJ. L.RaymondM. E.HanC.NegassiY.RichardsonW. Y.SnowW. (2017). Charter management organizations. Center for Research on Education Outcomes.
31.
YuklG. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of Management, 15(2), 251–290.
