This case study asks readers to contemplate what leadership practices may facilitate leadership succession at charter schools. The case narrative is followed by an activity designed for students in principal preparation programs. In this activity, students develop an exit strategy for the departing leader, a hiring plan for the charter school leadership, and an entry plan for the charter school’s successor, each of which outlines the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate change and maintain the charter school’s ongoing success.
BriggsA. R.BushT.MiddlewoodD. (2006). From immersion to establishment, the challenges facing new school heads and the role of “new visions” in resolving them. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 257-276.
2.
BulkleyK. E. (2004). Reinventing an idea: The political construction of charter schools. Educational Foundations, 18(1), 5-31.
3.
BushT.OduroG. K. (2006). New principals in Africa: Preparation, induction and practice. Journal of Educational Administration, 44, 359-375.
4.
CampbellC. (2010). You’re leaving? Succession and sustainability in charter schools. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
5.
Center for Education Reform. (2011). Choice and Charter School Facts. Availabe from http://www.edreform.com
6.
FinkD.BraymanC. (2004). Principals’ succession and educational change. Journal of Educational Administration, 42, 431-439.
7.
FinkD.BraymanC. (2006). School leadership succession and the challenges of change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 62-89.
8.
GawlikM. A. (2008). Breaking loose: Principal autonomy in charter and public schools. Educational Policy, 22(6), 783-804.
9.
GilesC.HargreavesA. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 124-156.
10.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164.
HargreavesA.MooreS.FinkD.BraymanC.WhiteR. (2003). Succeeding Leaders? A study of principal succession and sustainability. Boston, MA: Boston College.
13.
HartA. (1993). Principal succession: Establishing leadership in schools. Albany: SUNY Press.
14.
LeithwoodK.RiehlC. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In FirestoneW.RiehlC. (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
15.
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2013). Every child deserves a great education. Available from http://www.publiccharters.org/
NiY.SunM.RorrerA. (2014). Principal turnover: Upheaval and uncertainty in charter schools?Educational Administration Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0013161X14539808.
18.
SarasonS. (1972). The creation of settings and future societies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
SullivanK. (1995). Stable leadership, time for reflection contribute to momentum. Journal of Staff Development, 16(1), 6-8.
20.
WalkerA.QianH. (2006). Beginning principals: Balancing at the top of the greasy pole. Journal of Educational Administration, 44, 297-309.
21.
WohlstetterP.ChauD. (2004). Does autonomy matter? Implementing research-based practices in charter and other public schools. In BulkleyK. E.Wohlstetter (Eds.), Taking account of charter schools: What’s happened and what’s next? (pp. 53-71). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
