This case examines how school leaders manage the increased demands of a new state-mandated teacher evaluation process. Subject to negotiations, districts and their local teacher unions can allow for teachers to be credentialed and serve as evaluators within their own schools. The challenge is examined through both the opportunity costs of this new evaluation system and the cultural capacities of the administrators and teachers to foster trust and professionalism in a unionized educational environment.
BallouD. (2000a). Contractual constraints on school management: Principals’ perspectives on teacher contracts. In RavitchD.ViterittiJ. (Eds.), City schools: Lessons from New York (pp. 89-116). Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
2.
BallouD. (2000b). Teacher contracts in Massachusetts. Boston, MA: Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Analysis.
3.
BathonJ. (2013). Collective bargaining in public schools. In GoodenM. A.EckesS. E.MeadJ. F.McNealL. R.TorresM. S.Jr. (Eds.), The principal’s legal handbook (5th ed., pp. 569-582). Dayton, OH: Education Law Association.
4.
BennettJ. T.KaufmanB. E. (2007). What do unions do? A twenty year perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
5.
Darling-HammondL. (1988). Policy and professionalism. In LiebermanA. (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 55-77). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
6.
Darling-HammondL. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
DrakeT. L.RoeW. H. (2003). The principalship (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
8.
GallagherH. A. (2004). Vaughan elementary’s innovative teacher evaluation system: Are teacher evaluation scores related to growth in student achievement. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 79-107.
9.
GlickmanC. D.GordonS. P.Ross-GordonJ. M. (2013). The basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
10.
GoldhaberD.TheobaldR. (2013). Managing the teacher workforce in austere times: The determinants of teacher layoffs. Education Finance and Policy, 8, 494-527.
11.
HarrisD. N.IngleW. K.RutledgeS. A. (2014). How teacher evaluation methods matter for accountability: A comparative analysis of teacher ratings by principals and teacher value-added measures. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 73-112.
12.
HillP. (2006). The costs of collective bargaining agreements and related district policies. In HannawayJ.RotherhamA. J. (Eds.), Collective bargaining in education: Negotiating change in today’s schools (pp. 89-109). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
13.
HirschB. T.MacphersonD. A.VromanW. G. (2001). Estimates of union density by state. Monthly Labor Review, 124(7), 51-55.
14.
HunkinsF. P.OrnsteinA. C. (2004). Curriculum foundations, principles, and issues (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
15.
JacobB. A.LefgrenL. (2008). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26, 101-136.
16.
JohnsonS. M.KardosS. M. (2000). Reforming bargaining and its promise for school improvement. In LovelessT. (Ed.), Conflicting missions? Teachers unions and educational reform (pp. 7-46). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17.
IngleW. K.RutledgeS. A.BishopJ. L. (2011). Context matters: Principals’ sensemaking of teacher hiring and on-the-job performance. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 579-610.
18.
KimballS. M.MilanowskiA. (2004). Examining the relationship between teacher evaluation and student assessment results in Washoe County. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 54-78.
19.
LashwayL. (2003). Trends and issues: Role of the school leader (Report No. 071). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
MarzanoR.WatersT.McNultyB. (2011). Leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22.
MedleyD. M.CokerH. (1987). The accuracy of principals’ judgments of teacher performance. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 242-247.
23.
MilanowskiA. (2004). The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student assessment: Evidence from Cincinnati. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 33-53.
24.
MurphyJ.HallingerP.HeckR. H. (2013). Leading via teacher evaluation: The case of the missing clothes?Educational Researcher, 42, 349-354.
25.
Ohio School Boards Association. (2002). Labor relations primer. Columbus: Author.
26.
PainterS. R. (2000). Principals’ efficacy beliefs about teacher evaluation. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 368-378.
27.
RockoffJ. E.StaigerD. O.KaneT. J.TaylorE. S. (2010, July). Information and employee evaluation: Evidence from a randomized intervention in public schools (NBER Working Paper No. 16240). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
28.
StodolskyS. (1984). Teacher evaluation: The limits of looking. Educational Researcher, 13(9), 11-18.
29.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217-247.
30.
Tschannen-MoranM.ParishJ.DiPaolaM. F. (2006). School climate and state standards: How interpersonal relationships influence student achievement. Journal of School Leadership, 16, 386-415.
31.
WeisbergD.SextonS.MulhernJ.KellingD. (2009). The widget effect. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project.
32.
YoungI. P. (2008). The human resource function in educational administration (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
