Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The federal Race to the Top initiative signified a shift in American education policy whereby accountability efforts moved from the school to the teacher level. Using administrative data from Tennessee, we explore whether evaluation reforms differentially influenced mobility patterns for teachers of varying effectiveness. We find that the rollout of a statewide evaluation system, even without punitive consequences, was associated with increased turnover; however, there was comparably greater retention of more effective teachers, with larger differences in turnover between highly and minimally effective teachers confined to urban districts and low-performing schools. These results imply that states and districts can increase exit rates of low-performing instructors in the absence of automatic dismissals, which is a pattern that our analyses suggest may not generalize beyond urban school settings.

Keywords

educational reform evaluation retention school/teacher effectiveness teacher research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaronson

Barrow

Sander

(2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135. https://doi.org/10.1086/508733

Arnold

(2005). Managing human resources to improve employee retention. The Health Care Manager, 24(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200504000-00006

Ballou

Springer

M. G.

(2015). Using student test scores to measure teacher performance: Some problem in the design and implementation of evaluation systems. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15574904

Blazar

Kraft

M. A.

(2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260

Bleiberg

Harbatkin

(2018). Teacher evaluation reform: A convergence of federal and local forces. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818802105

Boswell

W. R.

Boudreau

J. R.

(2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-1096(200023)11:3<283::AID-HRDQ6>3.0.CO;2-3

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2009). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement (CALDER Working Paper No. 23). https://web.stanford.edu/~sloeb/papers/Who%20Leaves%20%20Teacher%20Attrition%20and%20Student%20Achievement%20%20Boyd%20et%20al%20January%202010%20(2).pdf

Campbell

S. L.

Ronfeldt

(2018). Observational evaluation of teachers: Measuring more than we bargained for? American Educational Research Journal, 55(6), 1233–1267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218776216

Chetty

Friedman

J. N.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2014a). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593–2632. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2593

10.

Chetty

Friedman

J. N.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2014b). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2633

11.

Clotfelter

Glennie

Ladd

Vigdor

(2008). Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1352–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.07.003

12.

Cullen

J. B.

Koedel

Parsons

. (2019). The compositional effect of rigorous teacher evaluation on workforce quality. Education Finance and Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00292

13.

Dee

T. S.

Wyckoff

(2015). Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21818

14.

Donaldson

M. L.

Papay

J. P.

(2014). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In Ladd

Geortz

(Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 174–193). Routledge.

15.

Evans

W. N.

Schwab

R. M.

Wagner

K. L.

(2014). The great recession and public education (Working paper). https://www3.nd.edu/~wevans1/working_papers/Russell%20Sage%20Paper%20final.pdf

16.

Evans

W. N.

Schwab

R. M.

Wagner

K. L.

(2019). The great recession and public education. Education Finance and Policy, 14(2), 298–326. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00245

17.

Garet

M. S.

Wayne

A. J.

Brown

Rickles

Song

Manzeske

(2017). The impact of providing performance feedback to teachers and principals (NCEE 2018-4001). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

18.

Goldhaber

(2002). The mystery of good teaching. Education Next, 2(1), 50–55.

19.

Goldhaber

Quince

Theobald

(2018). Has it always been this way? Tracing the evolution of teacher quality gaps in U.S. public schools. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 171–201. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217733445

20.

Gomer-Mejia

L. R.

Balkin

D. B.

Cardy

R. L.

(2015). Managing human resources (8th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

21.

Gonzales

Buie

(2018, April 19). TNReady results this year won’t count against students, teachers, Tennessee lawmakers decide. Tennessean. https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/education/2018/04/19/tennessee-schools-report-tnready-issues-others-able-test/532389002/

22.

Govaerts

Kyndt

Dochy

Baert

(2011). Influence of learning and working climate on the retention of talented employees. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621111097245

23.

Grissom

J. A.

Bartanen

. (2019). Strategic retention: Principal effectiveness and teacher turnover in multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 514–555. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218797931

24.

Grissom

J. A.

Kern

Rodriguez

L. A.

(2015). The “representative bureaucracy” in education: Educator workforce diversity, policy outputs, and outcomes for disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15580102

25.

Hanushek

Kain

O’Brien

Rivkin

(2005). The market for teacher quality (NBER Working Paper No. 11154). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11154

26.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

Rivkin

S. G

. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326–354. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XXXIX.2.326

27.

Henry

G. T.

Bastian

K. C.

Smith

A. A.

(2012). Scholarships to recruit the “best and brightest” into teaching: Who is recruited, where do they teach, how effective are they, and how long do they stay? Educational Researcher, 41(3), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12437202

28.

Jackson

C. K.

(2014). Non-cognitive ability, test scores, and teacher quality: Evidence from 9th grade teachers in North Carolina. NBER Working Paper 18624. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18624

29.

Kane

T. J.

Rockoff

J. E.

Staiger

D. O.

(2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.05.005

30.

Koedel

Springer

M. G.

Tan

(2019). Teacher performance ratings and professional improvement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12(1), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2018.1490471

31.

Koedel

Springer

M. G.

Tan

(2017). The impact of performance ratings on job satisfaction for public school teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 241–278. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216687531

32.

Kraft

M. A.

(2019). Teacher effects on complex cognitive skills and social-emotional competencies. Journal of Human Resources, 55(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.54.1.0916.8265R3

33.

Kraft

M. A.

Gilmour

A. F.

(2017). Revising the widget effect: Teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17718797

34.

Ladd

H. F.

Sorensen

L. C.

(2017). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241–279. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00194

35.

McGuinn

(2011). The state of teacher evaluation reform: State education agency capacity and the implementation of new teacher-evaluation systems. Center for American Progress. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539744.pdf

36.

National Bureau of Economic Research. (n.d.). US business cycle expansions and contractions. https://www.nber.org/cycles/

37.

Papay

J. P.

(2012). Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.1.v40p0833345w6384

38.

Papay

J. P.

Taylor

E. S.

Tyler

J. H.

Laski

(2016). Learning job skills from colleagues at work: Evidence from a field experiment using teacher performance data (NBER Working Paper No. 21986). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21986

39.

Pettijohn

C. E.

Pettijohn

L. S.

d’Amico

(2001). Characteristics of performance appraisals and their impact on sales force satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.4

40.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302244

41.

Rothstein

(2015). Teacher quality policy when supply matters. American Economic Review, 105(1), 100–130. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20121242

42.

Sanders

W. L.

Rivers

J. C.

(1996). Research project report: Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future academic achievement. University of Tennessee Value added Research and Assessment Center.

43.

Sartain

Steinberg

M. P.

(2016). Teachers’ labor market responses to performance evaluation reform: Experimental evidence from Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Human Resources, 51(3), 615–655. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.51.3.0514-6390R1

44.

Shores

Steinberg

M. P.

(2019). Schooling during the Great Recession: Patterns of school spending and student achievement using population data. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419877431

45.

Springer

M. G.

(2019). You get what you pay for: Why we need to invest in strategic compensation reform. National Institute for Excellence in Teaching.

46.

Springer

M. G.

Swain

W. A.

Rodriguez

L. A.

(2016). Effective teacher retention bonuses: Evidence from Tennessee. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715609687

47.

Steinberg

M. P.

Donaldson

M. L.

(2016). The new educational accountability: Understanding the landscape of teacher evaluation in the post-NCLB era. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00186

48.

Steinberg

M. P.

Garrett

(2016). Classroom composition and measured teacher performance: What do teacher observation scores really measure? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715616249

49.

Steinberg

M. P.

Sartain

(2015). Does teacher evaluation improve school performance? Experimental evidence from Chicago’s Excellence in Teaching Project. Education Finance and Policy, 10(4), 532–572. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00173

50.

Swain

W. A.

Rodriguez

L. A.

Springer

M. G.

(2019). Selective retention bonuses for highly effective teachers in high poverty schools: Evidence from Tennessee. Economics of Education Review, 68, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.12.008

51.

Taylor

E. S.

Tyler

J. H.

(2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628–3651. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3628

52.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top: Executive summary. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf

53.

Walden

M. L.

Sogutlu

(2001). Determinants of intrastate variation in teacher salaries. Economics of Education Review, 20(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(99)00055-2

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.70 MB

Sorting Through Performance Evaluations: The Influence of Performance Evaluation Reform on Teacher Attrition and Mobility

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material