As the climate crisis escalates, video games are gaining recognition for shaping environmental perspectives that might inspire change. Although research has tended to focus on serious games, the ecocritical potential of entertainment games is increasingly advocated. However, this potential remains underexplored from a transdisciplinary perspective that encompasses fields such as ecogame studies, game literacies, and game-based learning. This systematic literature review analyzes 80 studies published between 2019 and November 2024, addressing how entertainment video games engage with environmental issues. Six themes were defined: Game Design, Climate Change, Future-Oriented Perspectives, Posthumanist Approaches, Games in Non-Guided Contexts, and Games in Guided Contexts. These were discussed through the four ecocritical dimensions of video games: Knowing, Feeling, Imagining, and Acting. This review provides an overview of current research. It also suggests directions for future work, shifting attention from games’ ecocritical design to how players engage with and around games and their impact beyond gameplay.
AhmadovT.KarimovA.DurstS.SaarelaM.GerstlbergerW.WahlM. F.KarkkainenT. (2024). A two-phase systematic literature review on the use of serious games for sustainable environmental education. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2414429
BacaljaA. (2023). Digital game literacies and school learning: A sociocultural perspective. Ludic Language Pedagogy, 5, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.55853/llp_v5art1
7.
BackeH.-J. (2024). Between the lines: Using differential game analysis to develop environmental thinking. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.6
8.
Bandai Namco Studios. (2021). New Pokémon Snap.
9.
BaugusS. (2024). Press X to pet: A critical analysis of dog-petting mechanics in high-profile (MMO)RPGS. Comparative American Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2023.2301192
10.
BecklasC.BaumannS. (2024). Game over for climate change? Communicating and visualising global warming in digital games. English Literature, 10, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.30687/EL/2420-823X/2023/10/003
11.
BianchiM. (2019). Ecoplay: The rhetorics of games about nature. In DobrinS. I.MoreyS. (Eds.), Mediating nature: The role of technology in ecological literacy ((1st ed, pp. 15–29). Routledge.
12.
BianchiM. (2024). A field guide to monsters: Practices of wildlife watching in video games. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames: Playful perspectives on the climate crisis (pp. 559–576). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.10819591.30
BoothA.Martyn-St JamesM.ClowesM.SuttonA. (2021). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
15.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
16.
BuckinghamD.BurnA. (2007). Game literacy in theory and practice. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(3), 323–349. Retrieved October 31, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24376/.
17.
BudkeA. (2023). Guidelines for teachers on the use of digital games on SDG-relevant topics in geography classes. In Digitalization, New Media, and Education for Sustainable Development (pp. 171–186). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5033-5.ch012
18.
ButuceaV. (2020). Gaming as everything. Challenging the anthropocene through nomadic performativity. Nordic Theatre Studies, 32(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.7146/NTS.V32I1.120413
19.
CampoP.DanglesO. (2020). An overview of games for entomological literacy in support of sustainable development. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 40, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2020.05.018
CarmanJ. P.PsarosM.RosenthalS. A.MarlonJ.VernerM.LeeS.LuD.GoldbergM. H.BallewM.LeiserowitzA. (2024). Geeks versus climate change: Understanding American video gamers’ engagement with global warming. Climatic Change, 177(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03747-w
ChangA. Y. (2019). Playing nature: Ecology in video games. U of Minnesota Press.
25.
CoghlanS.SparrowL. (2021). The “digital animal intuition:” the ethics of violence against animals in video games. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09557-9
CoopiltonM. (2022). Critical game literacies and critical speculative imagination: A theoretical and conceptual review. Gamevironments, 17, 51–51. https://doi.org/10.48783/gameviron.v17i17.196
CrowleyE. J.SilkM. J.CrowleyS. L. (2021). The educational value of virtual ecologies in red dead redemption 2. People and Nature, 3(6), 1229–1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10242
31.
CrowleyS. (2023). Playing farmer: At the intersections of neo-liberal capitalism and ecocriticism in Stardew Valley. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 15(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00069_1
FalkenhaynerN. (2021). Futurity as an effect of playing horizon: Zero dawn (2017). Humanities (Switzerland), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/h10020072
37.
FarcaG. (2024). Ecology in the postapocalypse: Regenerative play in the metro series and the critical dystopia. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 241–258). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.13
38.
FengZ. (2024). How game ecology drives player choices in strategy video games: An environmental determinism perspective. Simulation and Gaming. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781241231895
39.
Fernández-GaleoteD.HamariJ. (2021). Game-based climate change engagement: Analyzing the potential of entertainment and serious games. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CHI PLAY), 226:1–226:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474653
40.
Firaxis Games. (2005). Civilization VI.
41.
FisherJ. C.YohN.KuboT.RundleD. (2021). Could nintendo’s animal crossing be a tool for conservation messaging?People and Nature, 3(6), 1218–1228. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10240
42.
Forgotten Empires. (2019). Age of Empires II.
43.
ForsP.KvistJ. (2024). Gaming for sustainable futures: Exploring the role of environmental empathy in worldmaking interactions. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 23(4), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2024.3469253
44.
FoxA. (2024). The face of extinction”: On haunted futures with machine-animals. In Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature (pp. 317–329). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41695-8_18
45.
FrelikP. (2022). Power games towards the rhetoric of energy in speculative video games. ER(R)GO, 44, 75–94. https://doi.org/10.31261/errgo.12332
GeeJ. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Se: Revised and Updated Edition.
49.
GiantS. (2016). ABZÛ.
50.
GrünB.HornikK. (2011). Topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13
HeijmenN.VervoortJ. (2023). It’s not always about you: The subject and ecological entanglement in video games. Games and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231179261
55.
HoM.-T.NguyenT.-H. T.NguyenM.-H.LaV.-P.VuongQ.-H. (2022). Good ethics cannot stop me from exploiting: The good and bad of anthropocentric attitudes in a game environment. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01742-y
HolmesS. (2019). Visualizing ecocritical euphoria in red dead redemption 2. In Mediating nature: The role of technology in ecological literacy (pp. 30–45). Routledge.
58.
Inkle. (2019). Heaven’s Vault.
59.
InwoodH. (2024). Space games: Ecologies of scale and technologies of hope in Taiwan’s OPUS game trilogy. Games and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120241273980
60.
KersánszkiT.MártonZ.FenyvesiK.LaviczaZ.HolikI. (2024). Minecraft in STEAM education—applying game-based learning to renewable energy. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), 60, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-060-008
61.
KimB.RasporichS.GuptaD. (2019). Imagining the sustainable future through the construction of fantasy worlds. In SenguptaP.ShanahanM.-C.KimB. (Eds.), Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 61–82). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29489-2_4
62.
Kojima Productions. (2019). Death stranding.
63.
Larreina-MoralesM. E.GunellaC. (2023). Video games for environmental awareness: The accessibility gap. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01026-6
64.
LuxJ.-D.BudkeA.GuardiolaE. (2021). Games versus reality? How game designers deal with current topics of geography education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5110070
65.
MakaiP. K. (2023). Simulated climate in ecological games: Mediating climate change to endow players with transformative agency. In The palgrave handb. Of intermediality: Volume 1-2 (Vol. 2, pp. 1061–1088). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28322-2_51
66.
MayL.HallB. (2023). From aesthetics to asymmetry: Contradictions of ecological play in cities: Skylines. Games and Culture. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231219729
McNallyB.de AndradeB. (2022). Altered spaces: New ways of seeing and envisioning nature with Minecraft. Visual Studies, 37(3), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2022.2090121
69.
Memory of God & Lambic Studios. (2019). Stillness of the Wind.
70.
MilesiL. (2022). Posthumanism and digital gaming. In Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism (Vol. 2, pp. 575–606). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_6
MukherjeeS. (2024). No cyclones in age of empires: Empire, ecology, and video games. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 163–180). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.9
75.
MurrayS. (2024). Postcoloniality, ecocriticism and lessons from the playable landscape. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 145–162). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.8
76.
Navarro-RemesalV.TorresM. T. (2024). Healing a life out of balance: Slowness and ecosophy in death stranding. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 223–240). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.12
NixonR. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.
84.
Northway Games. (2022). I was a teenage exocolonist.
85.
OcejaJ.González-FernándezN. (2018). Videojuegos y aprendizaje ¿Por qué la gamificación y los juegos educativos no son suficientes? In Torres-ToukoumidisÁ.Romero-RodríguezL. M. (Eds.), Gamificación en Iberoamérica. Experiencias desde la comunicación y la educación (1, pp. 55–70). Universidad Politécnica Salesiana. Retrevied October 31, 2024 from https://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/17051
Op De BekeL. (2021). Premediating climate change in videogames: Repetition, mastery, and failure. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 3(1), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2021-0010
88.
Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS. (2024). Ecogames: An Introduction. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 9–70). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.3
89.
O’ReillyD. (2017). Everything.
90.
OuzzaniM.HammadyH.FedorowiczZ.ElmagarmidA. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
91.
PageM.McKenzieJ.BossuytP.BoutronI.HoffmannT.MulrowC.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ.AklE.BrennanS.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ.HróbjartssonA.LaluM.LiT.LoderE.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
PooleR.SpanglerS. (2020). Eco this and recycle that’: An ecolinguistic analysis of a popular digital simulation game. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1617177
94.
PriceD. (2019). Damage over time: Structural violence and climate change in video games. In Violence | Percept. | Video Games: New Dir. In Game Res (pp. 105–112). Transcript-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839450512-010
95.
R Core Team. (2025). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
96.
Rockstar Games. (2018). Red Dead Redemption 2.
97.
RubergB. (2017). Permalife: Video games and the queerness of living. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 9(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.9.2.159_1
98.
Rubio-CampilloX.Marín-RubioK.Viasís-PamósJ. (2025). Corpus of academic publications that discuss the potential of entertainment video games to promote climate emergency literacy [Dataset]. CORA.Repositori de Dades de Recerca. https://doi.org/10.34810/DATA2440.
99.
RuffinoP. (2020). Nonhuman games: Playing in the post-anthropocene. In Death, culture and leisure: Play. Dead (pp. 11–25). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83909-037-020201008
100.
Rush-CooperN. (2024). Radiation, ruins and the post-apocalyptic stories: The chornobyl landscape in S.T.A.L.K.E.R. In Writing landscape and setting in the anthropocene (pp. 171–192). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49955-5_9
101.
SellerM. (2024). Hiding (in) the Tall Grass: Rethinking background assets in video game plantscapes. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 353–372). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.19
SquireK. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching participatory culture in the digital age.
104.
StanitsasM.KirytopoulosK.VareillesE. (2019). Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 924–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.157
105.
Strange Loop Games. (2018). ECO.
106.
SzleszynskiB.BarczA.ŁagodzkaD. (2019). People like animals? The significance of animal threads in the post-apocalyptic world in the last of us. In Human-Animal Studies (Vol. 21, pp. 191–200). Brill Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004386228_013
107.
Thatgamecompany. (2008). Flower.
108.
The Chinese Room. (2012). Dear Esther.
109.
Trépanier-JobinG.Charre-TchangM.Largeaud-OrtegaS. (2024). The underrealized ecocritical potential of ABZÛ. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 311–332). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.17
Van SchaikF. (2023). What happens if …? Uncertainty in games and climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 29(12), 1891–1910. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2225811
VervoortJ. M.MoossdorffC.ThompsonK. A. (2024). Games for better futures: The art and joy of making and unmaking societies. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 181–198). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.10
114.
VuongQ.-H.HoM.-T.NguyenM.-H.PhamT.-H.VuongT.-T.KhucQ.HoH.-A.LaV.-P. (2021). On the environment-destructive probabilistic trends: A perceptual and behavioral study on video game players. Technology in Society, 65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101530
WeinesJ.BoritM. (2022). Better game worlds by design: The GAS framework for designing and analyzing games based on socio-ecological systems thinking, demonstrated on Nusfjord (2017). Games and Culture, 17(2), 262–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211027109
117.
WickhamH. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
118.
WoolbrightL. (2019). Slow violence in a digital world: Tarahumara apocalypse and endogenous meaning in Mulaka. In KressnerI.MutisA. M.PettinaroliE. (Eds.), Ecofictions, ecorealities, and slow violence in latin America and the latinx World (pp. 199–217). Routledge. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001775-11
119.
YoungbloodJ. (2024). Have you ever heard a worm Sing?”: The spectral ecology of Kentucky route zero, act V. In Op de BekeL.RaessensJ.WerningS.FarcaG. (Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 335–352). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.18
120.
ZagirnyakM. Y. (2023). Tool-Kit for ethical analysis of video games: Answer to the challenges of the new enlightenment. Kantian Journal, 42(2), 111–140. https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2023-2-6
