Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As the climate crisis escalates, video games are gaining recognition for shaping environmental perspectives that might inspire change. Although research has tended to focus on serious games, the ecocritical potential of entertainment games is increasingly advocated. However, this potential remains underexplored from a transdisciplinary perspective that encompasses fields such as ecogame studies, game literacies, and game-based learning. This systematic literature review analyzes 80 studies published between 2019 and November 2024, addressing how entertainment video games engage with environmental issues. Six themes were defined: Game Design, Climate Change, Future-Oriented Perspectives, Posthumanist Approaches, Games in Non-Guided Contexts, and Games in Guided Contexts. These were discussed through the four ecocritical dimensions of video games: Knowing, Feeling, Imagining, and Acting. This review provides an overview of current research. It also suggests directions for future work, shifting attention from games’ ecocritical design to how players engage with and around games and their impact beyond gameplay.

Keywords

video games ecocriticism game literacies game-based learning environmental awareness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

11 Bit Studios. (2018). Frostpunk.

4A Games. (2019). Metro Exodus.

Abraham

B. J.

Jayemanne

(2017). Where are all the climate change games? Locating digital games’ response to climate change. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/121664

Ahmadov

Karimov

Durst

Saarela

Gerstlberger

Wahl

M. F.

Karkkainen

(2024). A two-phase systematic literature review on the use of serious games for sustainable environmental education. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2414429

Apperley

Beavis

(2013). A model for critical games literacy. E-Learning and Digital Media, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.1.1

Bacalja

(2023). Digital game literacies and school learning: A sociocultural perspective. Ludic Language Pedagogy, 5, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.55853/llp_v5art1

Backe

H.-J.

(2024). Between the lines: Using differential game analysis to develop environmental thinking. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.6

Bandai Namco Studios. (2021). New Pokémon Snap.

Baugus

(2024). Press X to pet: A critical analysis of dog-petting mechanics in high-profile (MMO)RPGS. Comparative American Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2023.2301192

10.

Becklas

Baumann

(2024). Game over for climate change? Communicating and visualising global warming in digital games. English Literature, 10, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.30687/EL/2420-823X/2023/10/003

11.

Bianchi

(2019). Ecoplay: The rhetorics of games about nature. In Dobrin

S. I.

Morey

(Eds.), Mediating nature: The role of technology in ecological literacy ((1st ed, pp. 15–29). Routledge.

12.

Bianchi

(2024). A field guide to monsters: Practices of wildlife watching in video games. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames: Playful perspectives on the climate crisis (pp. 559–576). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.10819591.30

13.

Blei

D. M.

(2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826

14.

Booth

Martyn-St James

Clowes

Sutton

(2021). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.

15.

Braun

Clarke

(2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

16.

Buckingham

Burn

(2007). Game literacy in theory and practice. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(3), 323–349. Retrieved October 31, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/24376/.

17.

Budke

(2023). Guidelines for teachers on the use of digital games on SDG-relevant topics in geography classes. In Digitalization, New Media, and Education for Sustainable Development (pp. 171–186). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5033-5.ch012

18.

Butucea

(2020). Gaming as everything. Challenging the anthropocene through nomadic performativity. Nordic Theatre Studies, 32(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.7146/NTS.V32I1.120413

19.

Campo

Dangles

(2020). An overview of games for entomological literacy in support of sustainable development. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 40, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2020.05.018

20.

Capcom. (2021). Monster hunter rise.

21.

Caracciolo

(2021). Animal Mayhem games and nonhuman-oriented thinking. Game Studies, 21(1). https://gamestudies.org/2101/articles/caracciolo

22.

Carman

J. P.

Psaros

Rosenthal

S. A.

Marlon

Verner

Lee

Goldberg

M. H.

Ballew

Leiserowitz

(2024). Geeks versus climate change: Understanding American video gamers’ engagement with global warming. Climatic Change, 177(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03747-w

23.

Chang

A. Y.

(2011). Games as environmental texts. Qui Parle, 19(2), 56–84. https://doi.org/10.5250/quiparle.19.2.0057

24.

Chang

A. Y.

(2019). Playing nature: Ecology in video games. U of Minnesota Press.

25.

Coghlan

Sparrow

(2021). The “digital animal intuition:” the ethics of violence against animals in video games. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09557-9

26.

Colossal Order. (2015). Cities: Skylines.

27.

Condis

(2020). Sorry, wrong apocalypse: Horizon zero dawn, heaven’s vault, and the ecocritical videogame. Game Studies, 20(3). https://gamestudies.org/2003/articles/condis

28.

Coopilton

(2022). Critical game literacies and critical speculative imagination: A theoretical and conceptual review. Gamevironments, 17, 51–51. https://doi.org/10.48783/gameviron.v17i17.196

29.

Coopilton

(2023). Critical Game Literacies and Afrofuturist Development [Ph.D.]. University of Southern California. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2850948570/abstract/93CAA88DD5AA4EEAPQ/1

30.

Crowley

E. J.

Silk

M. J.

Crowley

S. L.

(2021). The educational value of virtual ecologies in red dead redemption 2. People and Nature, 3(6), 1229–1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10242

31.

Crowley

(2023). Playing farmer: At the intersections of neo-liberal capitalism and ecocriticism in Stardew Valley. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 15(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00069_1

32.

Davis

M. A.

(2022). An overview of environmental themes in the video game industry. Geographical Bulletin - Gamma Theta Upsilon, 63(2), 97–108. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/thegeographicalbulletin/vol63/iss2/1

33.

DICE. (2021). Battlefield 2042.

34.

Djaouti

Alvarez

Jessel

J.-P.

Rampnoux

(2011). Origins of serious games. In Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 25–43). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_3

35.

E-Line Media. (2014). Never Alone.

36.

Falkenhayner

(2021). Futurity as an effect of playing horizon: Zero dawn (2017). Humanities (Switzerland), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/h10020072

37.

Farca

(2024). Ecology in the postapocalypse: Regenerative play in the metro series and the critical dystopia. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 241–258). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.13

38.

Feng

(2024). How game ecology drives player choices in strategy video games: An environmental determinism perspective. Simulation and Gaming. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781241231895

39.

Fernández-Galeote

Hamari

(2021). Game-based climate change engagement: Analyzing the potential of entertainment and serious games. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CHI PLAY), 226:1–226:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474653

40.

Firaxis Games. (2005). Civilization VI.

41.

Fisher

J. C.

Yoh

Kubo

Rundle

(2021). Could nintendo’s animal crossing be a tool for conservation messaging? People and Nature, 3(6), 1218–1228. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10240

42.

Forgotten Empires. (2019). Age of Empires II.

43.

Fors

Kvist

(2024). Gaming for sustainable futures: Exploring the role of environmental empathy in worldmaking interactions. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 23(4), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2024.3469253

44.

Fox

(2024). The face of extinction”: On haunted futures with machine-animals. In Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature (pp. 317–329). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41695-8_18

45.

Frelik

(2022). Power games towards the rhetoric of energy in speculative video games. ER(R)GO, 44, 75–94. https://doi.org/10.31261/errgo.12332

46.

Freye

(2023). Ecocritical agency in I was a teenage exocolonist. Games and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231209804

47.

Garrard

(2004). Ecocriticism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203644843

48.

Gee

J. P.

(2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Se: Revised and Updated Edition.

49.

Giant

(2016). ABZÛ.

50.

Grün

Hornik

(2011). Topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13

51.

GSC Game World. (2007). S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

52.

Guerrilla Games. (2017). Horizon Zero Dawn.

53.

Haraway

(2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780

54.

Heijmen

Vervoort

(2023). It’s not always about you: The subject and ecological entanglement in video games. Games and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231179261

55.

M.-T.

Nguyen

T.-H. T.

Nguyen

M.-H.

V.-P.

Vuong

Q.-H.

(2022). Good ethics cannot stop me from exploiting: The good and bad of anthropocentric attitudes in a game environment. Ambio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01742-y

56.

Hobbs

Behenna

(2023). Engaging children from under-represented groups with STEM using “Minecraft” to link with the UN SDGs. Primary Science, 177, 23–26. https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10519983/engaging-children-from-under-represented-groups-with-stem-using-minecraft-to-link-with-the-un-sdgs

57.

Holmes

(2019). Visualizing ecocritical euphoria in red dead redemption 2. In Mediating nature: The role of technology in ecological literacy (pp. 30–45). Routledge.

58.

Inkle. (2019). Heaven’s Vault.

59.

Inwood

(2024). Space games: Ecologies of scale and technologies of hope in Taiwan’s OPUS game trilogy. Games and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120241273980

60.

Kersánszki

Márton

Fenyvesi

Lavicza

Holik

(2024). Minecraft in STEAM education—applying game-based learning to renewable energy. Interaction Design and Architecture(s), 60, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-060-008

61.

Kim

Rasporich

Gupta

(2019). Imagining the sustainable future through the construction of fantasy worlds. In Sengupta

Shanahan

M.-C.

Kim

(Eds.), Critical, transdisciplinary and embodied approaches in STEM education (pp. 61–82). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29489-2_4

62.

Kojima Productions. (2019). Death stranding.

63.

Larreina-Morales

M. E.

Gunella

(2023). Video games for environmental awareness: The accessibility gap. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01026-6

64.

Lux

J.-D.

Budke

Guardiola

(2021). Games versus reality? How game designers deal with current topics of geography education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5110070

65.

Makai

P. K.

(2023). Simulated climate in ecological games: Mediating climate change to endow players with transformative agency. In The palgrave handb. Of intermediality: Volume 1-2 (Vol. 2, pp. 1061–1088). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28322-2_51

66.

May

Hall

(2023). From aesthetics to asymmetry: Contradictions of ecological play in cities: Skylines. Games and Culture. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231219729

67.

May

Hall

(2024). Thinking ecologically with battlefield 2042. Game Studies, 24(1). https://gamestudies.org/2401/articles/mayhall .

68.

McNally

de Andrade

(2022). Altered spaces: New ways of seeing and envisioning nature with Minecraft. Visual Studies, 37(3), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2022.2090121

69.

Memory of God & Lambic Studios. (2019). Stillness of the Wind.

70.

Milesi

(2022). Posthumanism and digital gaming. In Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism (Vol. 2, pp. 575–606). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_6

71.

Miner

J. D.

(2022). Critical protocols in Indigenous gamespace. Games and Culture, 17(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211005366

72.

Mojang. (2009). Minecraft.

73.

Moore

M. M.

Yang

J. Z.

(2020). Using eco-guilt to motivate environmental behavior change. Environmental Communication, 14(4), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1692889

74.

Mukherjee

(2024). No cyclones in age of empires: Empire, ecology, and video games. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 163–180). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.9

75.

Murray

(2024). Postcoloniality, ecocriticism and lessons from the playable landscape. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 145–162). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.8

76.

Navarro-Remesal

Torres

M. T.

(2024). Healing a life out of balance: Slowness and ecosophy in death stranding. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 223–240). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.12

77.

Ndemic Creations. (2012). Plague Inc.

78.

Nezlek

J. B.

Forestell

C. A.

(2020). Vegetarianism as a social identity. Current Opinion in Food Science, 33, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2019.12.005

79.

Y.-L.

(2024). Uses and gratifications of biophilic simulation games. Games and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120241249518

80.

Nikita

(2020). ldatuning: Tuning of the latent dirichlet allocation models parameters. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ldatuning

81.

Nintendo. (2013). Animal crossing: New leaf.

82.

Nintendo. (2020). Animal Crossing: New Horizons.

83.

Nixon

(2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.

84.

Northway Games. (2022). I was a teenage exocolonist.

85.

Oceja

González-Fernández

(2018). Videojuegos y aprendizaje ¿Por qué la gamificación y los juegos educativos no son suficientes? In Torres-Toukoumidis

Á.

Romero-Rodríguez

L. M.

(Eds.), Gamificación en Iberoamérica. Experiencias desde la comunicación y la educación (1, pp. 55–70). Universidad Politécnica Salesiana. Retrevied October 31, 2024 from https://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/17051

86.

Op de Beke

(2020). Anthropocene temporality in Gaia games. KronoScope, 20(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685241-12341470

87.

Op De Beke

(2021). Premediating climate change in videogames: Repetition, mastery, and failure. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 3(1), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.2478/njms-2021-0010

88.

Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

(2024). Ecogames: An Introduction. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 9–70). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.3

89.

O’Reilly

(2017). Everything.

90.

Ouzzani

Hammady

Fedorowicz

Elmagarmid

(2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

91.

Page

McKenzie

Bossuyt

Boutron

Hoffmann

Mulrow

Shamseer

Tetzlaff

Akl

Brennan

Chou

Glanville

Grimshaw

Hróbjartsson

Lalu

Loder

Mayo-Wilson

McDonald

Moher

(2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

92.

Piekutowski

P. F.

(2023). Swarm–hybrid–technology the transmedial possibilities of becoming-insect. Zoophilologica, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA.2023.11.04

93.

Poole

Spangler

(2020). Eco this and recycle that’: An ecolinguistic analysis of a popular digital simulation game. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1617177

94.

Price

(2019). Damage over time: Structural violence and climate change in video games. In Violence | Percept. | Video Games: New Dir. In Game Res (pp. 105–112). Transcript-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839450512-010

95.

R Core Team. (2025). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/

96.

Rockstar Games. (2018). Red Dead Redemption 2.

97.

Ruberg

(2017). Permalife: Video games and the queerness of living. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 9(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.9.2.159_1

98.

Rubio-Campillo

Marín-Rubio

Viasís-Pamós

(2025). Corpus of academic publications that discuss the potential of entertainment video games to promote climate emergency literacy [Dataset]. CORA.Repositori de Dades de Recerca. https://doi.org/10.34810/DATA2440.

99.

Ruffino

(2020). Nonhuman games: Playing in the post-anthropocene. In Death, culture and leisure: Play. Dead (pp. 11–25). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83909-037-020201008

100.

Rush-Cooper

(2024). Radiation, ruins and the post-apocalyptic stories: The chornobyl landscape in S.T.A.L.K.E.R. In Writing landscape and setting in the anthropocene (pp. 171–192). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49955-5_9

101.

Seller

(2024). Hiding (in) the Tall Grass: Rethinking background assets in video game plantscapes. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 353–372). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.19

102.

Smith

B. T. L.

(2017). Resources, scenarios, agency: Environmental computer games. https://ebuah.uah.es/dspace/handle/10017/31438

103.

Squire

(2011). Video games and learning: Teaching participatory culture in the digital age.

104.

Stanitsas

Kirytopoulos

Vareilles

(2019). Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 924–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.157

105.

Strange Loop Games. (2018). ECO.

106.

Szleszynski

Barcz

Łagodzka

(2019). People like animals? The significance of animal threads in the post-apocalyptic world in the last of us. In Human-Animal Studies (Vol. 21, pp. 191–200). Brill Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004386228_013

107.

Thatgamecompany. (2008). Flower.

108.

The Chinese Room. (2012). Dear Esther.

109.

Trépanier-Jobin

Charre-Tchang

Largeaud-Ortega

(2024). The underrealized ecocritical potential of ABZÛ. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 311–332). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.17

110.

Van Ooijen

(2019). Hunting, killing, crafting: On the use of animals in open world games. Human IT, 14(3), 26–47. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1417224&dswid=3386

111.

Van Schaik

(2023). What happens if …? Uncertainty in games and climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 29(12), 1891–1910. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2225811

112.

Vardanian

(2022). Reading the chornobyl catastrophe within ecofiction. Children’s Literature in Education, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-021-09437-w

113.

Vervoort

J. M.

Moossdorff

Thompson

K. A.

(2024). Games for better futures: The art and joy of making and unmaking societies. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 181–198). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.10

114.

Vuong

Q.-H.

M.-T.

Nguyen

M.-H.

Pham

T.-H.

Vuong

T.-T.

Khuc

H.-A.

V.-P.

(2021). On the environment-destructive probabilistic trends: A perceptual and behavioral study on video game players. Technology in Society, 65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101530

115.

Wallin

(2022). Game preserves: Digital animals at the brink of the post-anthropocene. Green Letters, 26(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14688417.2021.2023607

116.

Weines

Borit

(2022). Better game worlds by design: The GAS framework for designing and analyzing games based on socio-ecological systems thinking, demonstrated on Nusfjord (2017). Games and Culture, 17(2), 262–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211027109

117.

Wickham

(2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org

118.

Woolbright

(2019). Slow violence in a digital world: Tarahumara apocalypse and endogenous meaning in Mulaka. In Kressner

Mutis

A. M.

Pettinaroli

(Eds.), Ecofictions, ecorealities, and slow violence in latin America and the latinx World (pp. 199–217). Routledge. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001775-11

119.

Youngblood

(2024). Have you ever heard a worm Sing?”: The spectral ecology of Kentucky route zero, act V. In Op de Beke

Raessens

Werning

Farca

(Eds.), Ecogames (pp. 335–352). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.10819591.18

120.

Zagirnyak

M. Y.

(2023). Tool-Kit for ethical analysis of video games: Answer to the challenges of the new enlightenment. Kantian Journal, 42(2), 111–140. https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2023-2-6

The Ecocritical Dimensions of Entertainment Video Games: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References