Throughout literary history, the space of the forest has been associated with uncertainty and mystery. This association endures in the digital forests of modern video games, but it also acquires new meanings as the unpredictability of algorithmic systems converges with questions about environmental crisis. Inspired by discussions on ecogaming as well as philosophical arguments on forests as multispecies communities, this article examines various ways in which growing or exploring digital forests can speak to a fundamental uncertainty in human-nonhuman relations. In mobile games that adopt a “play-to-plant” model (e.g., EverForest, Longleaf Valley, Forest), digital forestry holds out a promise of direct real-world intervention that tends to elide the ethical uncertainties underlying gameplay. By contrast, in the survival game The Forest the AI shaping the behavior of nonplayer characters adapts to the ecological impact of the player's in-game actions, explicitly bringing together algorithmic unpredictability and the possibility of more-than-human community.
CaseyE. S.MarderM. (2024). Plants in place: A phenomenology of the vegetal. Columbia University Press.
11.
ChangA. Y. (2019). Playing nature: Ecology in video games. University of Minnesota Press.
12.
CostikyanG. (2013). Uncertainty in games. MIT Press.
13.
Endnight Games. (2014). The forest [Microsoft Windows].
14.
FinnE. (2017). What algorithms want: Imagination in the age of computing. MIT Press.
15.
FizekS. (2022). Playing at a distance: Borderlands of video game aesthetic. MIT Press.
16.
GallowayA. R. (2006). Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture. University of Minnesota Press.
17.
HaylesN. K. (2017). Unthought: The power of the cognitive nonconscious. University of Chicago Press.
18.
JenkinsH. (2004). Game design as narrative architecture. In Wardrip-FruinN.HarriganP. (Eds.), First person: New media as story, performance, and game (pp. 118–130). The MIT Press.
19.
JuulJ. (2010). A casual revolution: Reinventing video games and their players. MIT Press.
20.
KeetleyD.TengaA. (Eds.). (2016). Plant horror: Approaches to the monstrous vegetal in fiction and film. Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
KohnE. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press.
RyanM.-L. (2006). Avatars of story. University of Minnesota Press.
30.
SaundersC. J. (1993). The forest of medieval romance: Avernus, Broceliande, Arden. D. S. Brewer.
31.
Schneider-MayersonM.Weik von MossnerA.MaleckiW. P.HakemulderF. (Eds.). (2023). Empirical ecocriticism: Environmental narratives for social change. University of Minnesota Press.
SimardW.PerryD. A.JonesM. D.MyroldD. D.DurallD. M.MolinaR. (1997). Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree Species in the field. Nature, 388(6642), 579–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/41557
The International House of Mojo. (2024). The secret of Monkey Island: Mêlée Forest’s many sights. Retrieved November 23, 2025, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTDbbc14fAU
39.
TreesPlease Games. (2023). Longleaf Valley [Android].
