This paper explores the concept of ruins in interactive entertainment, focusing on games that become ruins due to abandonment, technological decay, or other processes unique to digital media. A comparative analysis of physical and digital ruins, their formation, contexts, and use, offers insight into how contemporary society deals with the remnants of its past—both physical and digital. The analysis highlights three main points: the disappearance of actual digital ruins contrasted with the persistence of their remnants, the “digitalisation” of certain processes visible in material ruins, and the emergence of new types of industrial sublime. The study underscores how digitalization transforms the nature of ruins, reflecting the evolving relationship between memory, decay, and technology.
ChiassonR. (2023). Immersion through ruins: Entanglement, pleasure, and struggle in Celeste. Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies, 29(2), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.30608/hjeas/2023/29/2/8
EdensorT. (2005a). Industrial Ruins: Spaces, Aesthetics, and Materiality. Berg.
5.
EdensorT. (2005b). The ghosts of industrial ruins: Ordering and disordering memory in excessive space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(6), 829–849. https://doi.org/10.1068/d58j
FisherC. (2022). The Story of Follies. Reaktion Books.
10.
FordM. (2021). Rule of the Robots. Hachette UK.
11.
FraserE. (2016). Awakening in ruins: The virtual spectacle of the End of the city in video games. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 8(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.8.2.177_1
12.
FuchsM. (2017). ‘Ruinensehnsucht’: Longing for decay in computer games. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v3i2.68.
13.
GallowayA. (2013). The Interface Effect. John Wiley & Sons.
14.
GinsbergR. (2004). The Aesthetics of Ruins. Rodopi.
KirschenbaumM. (2008). Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. MIT Press.
20.
LatourB. (1996). Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Translated by Cathrine Porter. Harvard University Press.
21.
LatourB. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
Mayer-SchonbergerV. (2011). Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. Princeton University Press.
24.
MensT.DemeyerS. (2008). Software Evolution. Springer Science & Business Media.
25.
MillerJ. (2023). Retail Ruins. Bristol University Press.
26.
NevilleB.VilleneuveJ. (2012). Waste-Site Stories. State University of New York Press.
27.
NichollsF.CookM. (2024). How to save a world: The go-along interview as game preservation methodology in Wurm online. ArXiv (Cornell University), 27, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3649921.3650017
28.
NyeD. (1996). American Technological Sublime. MIT Press.
RichardsonT. (2007). The Arcadian Friends. Bantam Press.
32.
RiederG.SimonJ. (2017). Big data: A new empiricism and its epistemic and socio-political consequences. In PietschW.WerneckeJ.OttM. (Eds.), Berechenbarkeit der welt?: Philosophie und wissenschaft im zeitalter von big data (pp. 85–105). Springer.
StolerA. (2013). Imperial Debris: On Ruins and Ruination. Duke University Press.
37.
SuominenJ.SivulaA.GardaM. B. “Incorporating Curator, Collector and Player Credibilities. Crowdfunding Campaign for the Finnish Museum of Games and the Creation of Game Heritage Community,” ed. Alison Gazzard and Carl Therrien, Kinephanos: Revue d’Études Des Médias et de Culture Populaire Special Issue, August 2018, no. spécial (August 2018).
Zenethian. “Steam Community :: Zenethian :: Review for Secret World Legends.” Steamcommunity.com,2024. https://steamcommunity.com/id/zenethian/recommended/215280/
