Advances in gaming and other entertainment technologies are evolving rapidly and create new conceptual challenges for understanding and explaining the user experiences they can facilitate. The present article reports a prospective study on a particularly promising entertainment technology of the future: Interactive storytelling (IS). Integrating various streams of computing technology, such as advanced visualization, natural speech processing, and autonomous agents, IS systems are envisioned to offer new, personalized and thus unique kinds of entertainment to mass audiences of the future. The authors refer to existing models of media entertainment for a theoretical analysis and analyze expert interviews with members of the international IS development community to lay out the foundations for a forecast model of the entertainment experience of future IS systems. The resulting model organizes fundamental requirements, modes of users’ information processing, and specific types of (pleasant) experiences, which holds implications for (future) entertainment theory and research that accompanies further development of IS media.
AylettR.LimM. Y.LouchartS.PettaP.RiedlM. (Eds.). (2010). Interactive Storytelling: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling ICIDS 2010(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6432). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
2.
BerlyneD. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
3.
BessiereK.SeayA. F.KieslerS. (2007). The ideal elf: Identity exploration in World of Warcraft. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 530–535.
CavazzaM.LugrinJ. L.PizziD.CharlesF. (2007). Madame Bovary on the Holodeck: Immersive interactive storytelling. ACM Multimedia2007, 651–660.
6.
CowleyB.CharlesD.BlackM.HickeyR. (2008). Toward an understanding of flow in video games. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 6, Article 20.
7.
CrawfordC. (2003). Chris Crawford on game design. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Press.
8.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper Row.
9.
CupchikG. C.KempS. (2000). The aesthetics of media fare. In ZillmannD.VordererP. (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 249–265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
DowS.MehtaM.HarmonE.MacIntyreB.MateasM. (2007). Presence and engagement in interactive drama. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1475–1484). New York, NY: ACM.
11.
IpB. (2008). Technological, content, and market convergence in the games industry. Games and Culture, 3, 199–224.
KlimmtC.HartmannT. (2006). Effectance, self-efficacy, and the motivation to play video games. In VordererP.BryantJ. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 132–145). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
KlimmtC.VordererP. (2003). Media psychology “is not yet there”: Introducing theories on media entertainment to the Presence debate. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 346–359.
15.
KlimmtC.HefnerD.VordererP. (2009). The video game experience as ‘true’ identification: A theory of enjoyable alterations of players' self-perception. Communication Theory, 19, 351–373.
16.
KlimmtC.BlakeC.HefnerD.VordererP.RothC. (2009). Player performance, satisfaction, and video game enjoyment. In NatkinS.DupireJ. (Eds.), Entertainment Computing: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC 2009)(Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5709, pp. 1–12). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
17.
KlimmtC.RizzoA.VordererP.KochJ.FischerT. (2009). Experimental evidence for suspense as determinant of video game enjoyment. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 29–31.
18.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.KepplingerC. (2006). Mystery appeal: Effects of uncertainty and resolution on the enjoyment of mystery. Media Psychology, 8, 193–212.
19.
KnoblochS. (2003). Suspense and mystery. In BryantJ.Roskos-EwoldsenD. R.CantorJ. (Eds.), Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann (pp. 379–396). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
KnoblochS.PatzigG.MendeA.-M.HastallM. (2004). Affective news: Effects of discourse structure in narratives on suspense, curiosity, and enjoyment while reading news and novels. Communication Research, 31, 259–287.
21.
KosterR. (2004). A theory of fun for game design. Phoenix, AZ: Paraglyph Press.
22.
LeeK. M.ParkN.JinS. A. (2006). Narrative and interactivity in computer games. In VordererP.BryantJ. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, consequences (pp. 259–274) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
MallonB.WebbB. (2005). Stand up and take your place: Identifying narrative elements in narrative adventure and role-play games, Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 3, Article 6b.
24.
MateasM.SternA. (2002). A behavior language for story-based believable agents. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17, 39–47.
25.
MurrayJ. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck. The future of narrative in cyberspace. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
26.
NakatsuR.RauterbergM.VordererP. (2005). A new framework for entertainment computing: From passive to active experience. In KishinoF.KitamuraY.KatoH.NagataN. (Eds.), Entertainment computing—ICEC 2005(Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencevol. 3711, pp. 1–12). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
27.
OatleyK. (1994). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23, 53–74.
28.
OliverM. B. (1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19, 315–342.
29.
PaivaA.DiasJ.SobralD.AylettR.SobreperezP.WoodsS.HallL. (2004). Caring for agents and agents that care: Building empathic relations with synthetic agents. Proceedings of the Third international Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1, 194–201.
30.
ParikkaJ.SuominenJ. (2006). Victorian snakes? Towards a cultural history of mobile games and the experience of movement. Game Studies, 6, article 9.
31.
PickeringJ. H.OlivierP. (2003). Declarative camera planning: Roles and requirements. Smart Graphics Symposium, SG 2003(Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2733, pp. 182–191). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
32.
PopeJ. (2010). Where do we go from here? Readers' responses to interactive fiction. Convergence, 16, 75–94.
33.
RiedlM.SternA. (2006). Believable agents and intelligent story adaptation for interactive storytelling. In GöbelS.MalkewitzR.IurgelI. (Eds.), Technologies for interactive digital storytelling and entertainment (Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencevol. 4326, pp. 1–12). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
34.
RowoldJ. (2008). Instrument development for esthetic perception assessment. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 35–40.
35.
SchneiderE. F.LangA.ShinM.BradleyS. D. (2004). Death with a story: How story impacts emotional, motivational, and physiological responses to first-person shooter video games. Human Communication Research, 30, 361–375.
36.
ShackleB. (2009). Usability: Context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interacting with Computers, 21, 339–346.
37.
SherryJ. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14, 328–347.
38.
ShustermanR. (2003). Entertainment: A question for aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics, 43, 289–307.
39.
SpierlingU.SzilasN. (2009). Authoring issues beyond tools. In IurgelI. A.ZagaloN.PettaP. (Eds.), Interactive storytelling: Second Joint International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS2009 (pp. 50–61). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
40.
TamboriniR.BowmanN. D.EdenA.GrizzardM.OrganA. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60, 758–777.
41.
TanE. S. H. (1994). Film-induced affect as a witness emotion. Poetics, 23, 7–32.
42.
ThorburnD. (1987). Television as an aesthetic medium. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 161–173.
43.
VordererP. (2000). Interactive entertainment and beyond. In ZillmannD.VordererP. (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 21–36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
VordererP.BryantJ. (Eds.). (2006). Playing video games: Motives, responses, consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
VordererP.KlimmtC.RitterfeldU. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14, 388–408.
46.
VordererP.WulffH. J.FriedrichsenM. (Eds.). (1996). Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
YoungR. M. (2000). Creating interactive narrative structures: The potential for AI approaches. AAAI Spring Symposium in Artificial Intelligence and Entertainment. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
48.
ZillmannD. (1996a). Sequential dependencies in emotional experience and behavior. In KavanaughR. D.ZimmerbergB.FeinS. (Eds.), Emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (p. 243–272). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
ZillmannD. (1996b). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In VordererP.WulffH. J.FriedrichsenM. (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199–231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
ZillmannD. (2000). Humor and comedy. In ZillmannD.VordererP. (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 37–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
ZillmannD. (2006). Empathy: Affective reactivity to others’ emotional experiences. In BryantJ.VordererP. (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 151–181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
