“A Little Bit Like Psychological Torture”: A Grounded Theory of the Sociocultural Challenges Surrounding Expertise Development in an Emerging Esports Ecosystem
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
“A Little Bit Like Psychological Torture”: A Grounded Theory of the Sociocultural Challenges Surrounding Expertise Development in an Emerging Esports Ecosystem
Esports-relevant expertise extends beyond gameplay to encompass the cultivation of knowledge, skills, networks, and resources that support competitive success. Using a grounded theory approach and insights from 33 interviews with esports players in an emerging ecosystem, this study develops a sociocultural model that identifies four interrelated dimensions shaping expertise development, while paying special attention to the challenges players face. Cultures represent the layered structures of meanings, values, and norms that influence practices within and around esports. Social relations highlight families, schools, peers, and other social actors that support and/or inhibit gaming pursuits. Minds address social-psychological dispositions, mindsets, and the interpersonal dynamics that impact expertise. Finally, resources foreground how finances, space, time, and emotions enable or constrain players’ growth. Together, these dimensions reveal the multifaceted and interconnected ecology surrounding esports-relevant expertise development. The article highlights the value of an inductive approach for generating new and novel insights, and offers a valuable framework for understanding the sociocultural factors influencing esports-relevant expertise.
AdinolfS.TurkayS. (2018). Toxic behaviors in Esports games: Player perceptions and coping strategies. Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (pp. 365–372).
2.
AndersonC. G.TsaasanA.ReitmanJ.LeeJ. S.WuM.SteelH.TurnerT.SteinkuehlerC. (2018). Understanding esports as a stem career ready curriculum in the wild. 10th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games) (pp. 1–6).
3.
BarronB. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193–224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094368
4.
BeckerH. S. (1982). Culture: A sociological view. Yale Review, 71(4), 513–527.
BonillaI.ChamarroA.VenturaC. (2022). Psychological skills in esports: Qualitative study of individual and team players. Aloma, 40(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2022.40.1.36-41
7.
BorowyM.JinD. Y. (2013). Pioneering eSport: The experience economy and the marketing of early 1980s arcade gaming contests. International Journal of Communication, 7, 21.
8.
BoudaoudB.SpjutJ.KimJ.MadhusudanA.WatsonB. (2022). Esports and expertise: What competitive gaming can teach us about mastery. Interactions, 29(6), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3567954
9.
BrockT. (2021). Counting clicks: Esports, neoliberalism and the affective power of gameplay metrics. In JinD. Y. (Ed.), Global esports: Transformation of cultural perceptions of competitive gaming (pp. 132–48). Bloomsbury Academic.
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
11.
ChangY. K.ChenK.LiZ. (2024). Systematic framework for esports training: Informing eSports Training with the Learning Sciences. Simulation & Gaming, 55(1), 82–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781231219938
12.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
13.
ColeT.GilliesM. (2022, April). Emotional exploration and the eudaimonic gameplay experience: a grounded theory. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16).
14.
CoteA. C.FoxmanM.LawY. Y. (2024). Qualitative esports research methodology. In Routledge handbook of esports (pp. 123–134). Routledge.
15.
De MoorW.TerrienM.DurandC.BesombesN. (2023). The current situation of the French professional esports industry: Economic models of the clubs and regulation of the leagues. European Sport Management Quarterly, 23(6), 1906–1927. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2080853
16.
DonaldsonS. (2017). Mechanics and metagame: Exploring binary expertise in League of Legends. Games and Culture, 12(5), 426–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015590063
FerrariS. (2013). eSport and the human body: Foundation for a popular aesthetics. Proceedings of DiGRA 2013: DeFragging Game Studies.
19.
FlahertyM. G. (2005). An accelerating tempo: Recent contributions to the study of time. Symbolic Interaction, 28(2), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.2.291
20.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
21.
GrillsS. (2020). Understanding everyday life: Generic social processes and the pursuit of transcontextuality. Symbolic Interaction, 43(4), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.468
22.
GuoZ.CahalaneM.CarbonieA. (2020). Pursuit of happiness through esports: An interpretive structural approach. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).
23.
HongH. J.HongS. H. (2023). Transitioning out of esports: Exploring the experiences of professional esports players in South Korea. Journal of Electronic Gaming and Esports, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1123/jege.2023-0008
JinD. Y. (2020). Historiography of Korean esports: Perspectives on spectatorship. International Journal of Communication, 14, 3727–3745.
26.
JiowH. J.AthwalR. J. S.ChewL. L.EliasM. H.LimN.LyeQ. T.NgX. Y.WooK. (2018). Perceptions of video gaming careers and its implications on parental mediation. First Monday, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i2.8048
27.
JohnsonN. F. (2007). Teenage technological experts: Bourdieu and the performance of expertise. Deakin University.
28.
JohnsonM. R. (2019). Inclusion and exclusion in the digital economy: Disability and mental health as a live streamer on Twitch. Tv. Information, Communication & Society, 22(4), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1476575
29.
JohnsonM. R.CarriganM.BrockT. (2019). The imperative to be seen: The moral economy of celebrity video game streaming on Twitch.tv. First Monday, 24(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i8.8279
30.
JohnsonM. R.WilliamsJ. P. (2023). Bottom-up and top-down tensions: Comparing the Australian and Singaporean esports ecosystems. In Esports in the Asia-Pacific: Ecosystem, communities, and identities (pp. 17–38). Springer.
31.
JohnsonM. R.WoodcockJ. (2019). The impacts of live streaming and Twitch.tv on the video game industry. Media, Culture & Society, 41(5), 670–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818363
32.
JohnsonM. R.WoodcockJ. (2021). Work, play, and precariousness: An overview of the labour ecosystem of esports. Media, Culture & Society, 43(8), 1449–1465. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211011555
33.
KimS. H.ThomasM. K. (2015). A stage theory model of professional video game players in South Korea: The socio-cultural dimensions of the development of expertise. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 14(5), 176–186.
34.
KirschnerD.WilliamsJ. P. (2013). Experts and novices or expertise? Positioning players through gameplay reviews. Proceedings of DiGRA 2013: Defragging Game Studies.
35.
KordyakaB.JahnK.NiehavesB. (2020). Towards a unified theory of toxic behavior in video games. Internet Research, 30(4), 1081–1102. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2019-0343
36.
KordyakaB.ParkS.KrathJ.LaatoS. (2023). Exploring the relationship between offline cultural environments and toxic behavior tendencies in multiplayer online games. ACM Transactions on Social Computing.
LeeT. (2016). Forging an ‘Asian’ media fusion: Singapore as a 21st century media hub. Media International Australia, 158(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X15622082
39.
LeisO.LautenbachF. (2020). Psychological and physiological stress in non-competitive and competitive esports settings: A systematic review. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 51, 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101738
40.
LemkeJ. (2013). Feeling and meaning in the social ecology of learning: Lessons from play and games. In Affective learning together (pp. 71–94). Routledge.
41.
LinderothJ. (2012). Why gamers don’t learn more: An ecological approach to games as learning environments. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 4(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw.4.1.45_1
42.
MeltzerB. N. (2003). Mind. In Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 253–266). AltaMira Press.
43.
Meng-LewisY.WongD.ZhaoY.LewisG. (2022). Understanding complexity and dynamics in the career development of eSports athletes. Sport Management Review, 25(1), 106–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.08.003
44.
MiegH. A. (2006). Social and sociological factors in the development of expertise. In The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 743–760). Cambridge University Press.
45.
MorseJ. M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. In The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 229–244). SAGE.
NgB. W.-M. (2001). Japanese video games in Singapore: History, culture and industry. Asian Journal of Social Science, 29(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853101X00361
48.
NielsenR. K. L.HanghøjT. (2019). Esports skills are people skills. 13th European Conference on Game-Based Learning (pp. 535–542).
49.
PelliconeA. J.AhnJ. (2017, May). The game of performing play: Understanding streaming as cultural production. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4863–4874).
PersicoD.PassarelliM.PozziF.EarpJ.DagninoF. M.ManganelloF. (2019). Meeting players where they are: Digital games and learning ecologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1687–1712. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12777
52.
PlussM.NovakA. R.BennettK. J.PanchukD.CouttsA. J.FransenJ. (2020). Perceptual-motor abilities underlying expertise in esports. Journal of Expertise, 3(2), 133–143.
ReitmanJ. G.GardnerR.CampbellK.ChoA.SteinkuehlerC. (2020). Academic and social-emotional learning in high school esports. Proceedings of the Connected Learning Summit.
55.
RichardG. T.McKinleyZ. A.AshleyR. W. (2019). Collegiate esports as learning ecologies: Investigating collaboration, reflection and cognition during competitions. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 4(3), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v4i3.96
56.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage.
57.
SalterM. (2018). From geek masculinity to gamergate: The technological rationality of online abuse. Crime, Media, Culture, 14(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659017690893
ScottM. J.SummerleyR.BesombesN.ConnollyC.GawrysiakJ.HaleviT.JennyS.MiljanovicM.StangeM.TaipalusT.Patrick WilliamsJ. (2021). Foundations for esports curricula in higher education. In ITiCSE-WGR ‘21: Proceedings of the 2021 working group reports on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 27–55). ACM.
60.
SeoY.JungS.-U. (2016). Beyond solitary play in computer games: The social practices of eSports. Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(3), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514553711
61.
SnodgrassJ. G.ClementsK. R.NixonW. C.OrtegaC.LauthS.AndersonM. (2020). An iterative approach to qualitative data analysis: Using theme, cultural models, and content analyses to discover and confirm a grounded theory of how gaming inculcates resilience. Field Methods, 32(4), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X20939749
62.
StebbinsR. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. McGill-Queen's University Press.
63.
TangW. (2018). Understanding esports from the perspective of team dynamics. The Sport Journal, 21, 1–14.
64.
TaylorT. L. (2012). Raising the stakes: E-sports and the professionalization of computer gaming. MIT Press.
65.
TaylorS. (2015). A new mystique? Working for yourself in the neoliberal economy. The Sociological Review, 63(1_suppl), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12248
66.
ThaicharoenS.GowJ.DrachenA. (2023). An ecosystem framework for the meta in esport games. Journal of Electronic Gaming and Esports, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1123/jege.2022-0045
67.
van LaarE.van DeursenA. J.van DijkJ. A.de HaanJ. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
68.
von GillernS. (2021). Communication, cooperation, and competition: Examining the literacy practices of esports teams. In HarveyM.MarlattR. (Eds.), Esports research and its integration in education (pp. 148–167). IGI Global.
69.
WangC. K. J.LiuW. C.ChyeS.ChatzisarantisN. L. (2011). Understanding motivation in internet gaming among Singaporean youth: The role of passion. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1179–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.012
WilliamsJ. P.ChuaV. P. R. (2021). Conventional culture, subcultural institutions and subcultural careers as backdrops to identity work in Singapore's esports scene. In DupontT.BealB. (Eds.), Lifestyle sport and identity: Subcultural careers through the life course (pp. 227–247). Routledge.
72.
WilliamsJ. P.SmithJ. H. (2007). From moral panics to mature games research in action. In Patrick WilliamsJ.SmithJ. H. (Eds.), The players’ realm: Studies on the culture of video games and gaming (pp. 1–15). McFarland.
73.
WitkowskiE. (2009). Probing the sportiness of eSports. In ChristophersJ.ScholzT. (Eds.), eSports yearbook 2009 (pp. 53–56). Books on Demand.
74.
WitkowskiE. (2023). Growing pains in esports associationalism: four modes of national esports associational development. Games and Culture, 18(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221084449
75.
YueY.RuiW.LingS. C. S. (2020). Development of E-sports industry in China: Current situation, trend and research hotspot. International Journal of Esports, 1(1).
76.
ZhaoY.LiQ.LinZ. (2023). Toward cultural and creative industry: Chinese eSports through a business ecosystem lens. Journal of Cultural Economy, 16(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2022.2159494
77.
ZhongY.GuoK.SuJ.ChuS. K. W. (2022). The impact of esports participation on the development of 21st century skills in youth: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 191, 104640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104640
