In the face of a global ecological crisis, culturally dominant framings of subjective experience as separate from living ecologies are no longer sufficient. Games might offer ways to break down these divisions. Alenda Chang has proposed bringing game ecologies to life. To complement her position, in this paper, we aim to inspire game designers and researchers to explore ways in which video games can remodel the perceived player subject as a pathway to ecological entanglement. We investigate four strategies for decentering and deconstructing the subject. These are: (1) deconstructing the subject to foreground internal sources of entanglement; (2) dismantling, distorting, ignoring, and/or invading the visual perspective; (3) conceptual deconstruction and reframing of a sense of self; and (4) decentering the subject through shifting contexts. For each of these, we introduce relevant examples of narrative and gameplay design in existing video games and suggest steps for further development in each direction.
AarsethE. (2004). Genre trouble: Narrativism and the art of simulation. In HarringtonP.Wardrip-FruinN. (Eds.), First person: new media as story, performance, and game (pp. 45–47). MIT Press.
2.
Arbitrary Metric (2018). Paratopic. Microsoft Windows. USA: Steam.
3.
BaiX.van der LeeuwS.O'BrienK.BerkhoutF.BiermannF.BrondizioE. S.CudennecC.DearingJ.DuraiappahA.GlaserM.RevkinA.SteffenW.SyvitskiJ. (2016). Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda. Global Environmental Change, 39, 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017
4.
BrittonW. B.DesbordesG.AcabchukR.PetersS.LindahlJ. R.CanbyN. K.VagoD. R.DumaisT.LipskyJ.KimmelH.SagerL.RahrigH.CheaitoA.AceroP.ScharfJ.LazarS. W.Schuman-OlivierZ.FerrerR.MoitraE. (2021). From self-esteem to selflessness: An evidence (gap) map of self-related processes as mechanisms of mindfulness-based interventions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 730972. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730972
5.
ChangA. Y. (2011). Games as environmental texts. In FiglerowiczMartaPorzakSimon (Eds.), Qui parle (Vol. 19, no 2, pp. 56–84). Duke University Press.
de WildtL.ApperleyT. H.ClemensJ.FordyceR.MukherjeeS. (2020). (Re-)Orienting the video game avatar. Games and Culture, 15(8), 962–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019858890
9.
Double Fine Productions. (2014). Mountain. Microsoft Windows. USA: Steam.
10.
Dowino. (2015). A blind legend. Microsoft Windows. USA: Steam.
Fernández-VaraC. (2019). Introduction to game analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
15.
FoddyB. (2008). QWOP. HTML5.
16.
Freitas RangelD.LimaJ. S.Da SilvaE. F. N.de Aquino FerreiraK.CostaL. L. (2022). Pokémon as a playful and didactic tool for teaching about ecological interactions. Journal of Biological Education, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2026803
17.
Frictional Games (2010). Amnesia: The dark descent. Microsoft Windows. USA: Steam.
18.
Frictional Games (2015). Soma. Microsoft Windows. USA: Steam.
19.
GranicI.LobelA.EngelsR. C. M. E. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857
20.
HarawayD. (2016). Tentacular thinking: Anthropocene, capitalocene, chthulucene. In FisherMichael M. J.DumitJoseph (Eds.), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (pp. 30–57). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373780-005
21.
HeijmenN.VosmeerM. (2022). Final Fantasy VII Remake: In Search of Queer Celebration. Proceedings of the 2022 DiGRA International Conference, Kraków, Poland.
22.
JanikJ. (2021). Intra-acting bio-object: A posthuman approach to the player–game relation. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1386/jgvw_00026_1
23.
KagenM. (2022). Wandering games. MIT Press.
24.
KellyS.NardiB. (2014). Playing with sustainability: Using video games to simulate futures of scarcity. First Monday19(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i5.5259
25.
LakoffG. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
26.
LebedevA. V.LövdénM.RosenthalG.FeildingA.NuttD. J.Carhart-HarrisR. L. (2015). Finding the self by losing the self: Neural correlates of ego-dissolution under psilocybin. Human Brain Mapping, 36(8), 3137–3153. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22833
27.
LethebyC.GerransP. (2017). Self unbound: Ego dissolution in psychedelic experience. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2017(1), nix016. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix016
28.
MarcotteJ. (2018). Queering control(lers) through reflective game design practices. Game Studies, 18(3). Retrieved November 23, 2022, fromhttp://gamestudies.org/1803/articles/marcotte
29.
MilkoreitM. (2019). Pop-cultural mobilization: Deploying game of thrones to shift US climate change politics. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 32, 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-017-9273-7
30.
MortonT. (2009). Ecology without nature. Harvard University Press.
31.
MortonT. (2016). Dark ecology: for a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press.
Ruberg. (2017). Playing to lose the queer art of failing at video games. In MalkowskiJenniferRusswormTreaandrea M. (Eds.), Gaming representation: race gender and sexuality in video games (pp. 197–210). Indiana University Press.
36.
SalenK.ZimmermanE. (2003). Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press.
37.
SchleinerA.-M. (2017). The player's power to change the game: ludic mutation. Amsterdam University Press.
38.
SicartM. (2017). Queering the controller. In TrammellAaronTornerEvanWaldronEmma LeighJonesShelly (Eds.), Analog game studies (Vol. 4, pp. 171–188). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University: ETC Press. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/11929782.v1
39.
Somethin’ Else. (2010). Papa sangre. iOS. USA: Somethin’ Else.
40.
SteffenW.RichardsonK.RockströmJ.CornellS. E.FetzerI.BennettE. M.BiggsR.CarpenterS. R.de VriesW.de WitC. A.FolkeC.GertenD.HeinkeJ.MaceG. M.PerssonL. M.RamanathanV.ReyersB.SörlinS. (2015). Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
41.
TaylorN.BergstromK.JensonJ.de CastellS. (2015). Alienated playbour: Relations of production in EVE online. Games and Culture, 10(4), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014565507
42.
Van de MosselaerN.GualeniS. (2020). The implied designer and the experience of gameworlds. Proceedings of the 2020 DiGRA International Conference, Tampere, Finland.
43.
VellaD.CieleckaM. (2021). “You won’t even know who you are anymore”: Bakthinian polyphony and the challenge to the ludic subject in disco elysium. Baltic Screen Media Review, 9(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsmr-2021-0009
VervoortJ.MangnusA.McGreevyS.OtaK.ThompsonK.RupprechtC.TamuraN.MoossdorffC.SpiegelbergM.KobayashiM. (2022). Unlocking the potential of gaming for anticipatory governance.Earth System Governance, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2021.100130
