The Orc—Playing the “Wholly Other”: Investigations of Kant's Sublime and The Technological Sublime in Blizzard Entertainment's Massive Multiplayer Online Game World of Warcraft
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2023
The Orc—Playing the “Wholly Other”: Investigations of Kant's Sublime and The Technological Sublime in Blizzard Entertainment's Massive Multiplayer Online Game World of Warcraft
While the complicated scheme of the philosophical sublime may at first hand seem mere platitude when brought to life in computer games, this article claims that the action/adventure game World of Warcraft wedges open a space in which to operate the sublime and navigate radically “other” subjectivities. The hypothesis is that the assembly of fantastic elements in World of Warcraft duplicates the Kantian sublime while at the same time commenting upon and even radicalizing it. The Romantic tradition of the sublime as it unfolds in Immanuel Kant's third Critique is outlined followed by an attempt to topologize elements of the fantastic in Blizzard's game design philosophy leading to a clarification of what we call “the knotted point of play” where game object, game interaction, and game subject intervene. Finally, we explore how the notion of the technological sublime relates to World of Warcraft and beyond.
AbadiM.CardelliL. (1998). A Theory of Objects. Springer.
2.
BurgunK. (2015). Clockwork Game Design. Focal Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
3.
CampbellJ. (2008). The Hero with a Thousand Faces. New World Library.
4.
CarrollN. (1990). The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart. Routledge.
5.
De BollaP. (1989). The Discourse of the Sublime: Readings in History, Aesthetics and the Subject. Blackwell.
6.
DerridaJ. (2008). The Animal That Therefore I Am. Fordham University Press.
7.
DeutschD. (2011). The Beginning of Infinity. Penguin Books.
8.
DoranR. (2015). The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant. Cambridge University Press.
9.
EliadeM. (1968). The Sacred and the Profane. Mariner Books.
10.
EspositoC.BeckS. (2009). Die Schranken der Erfahrung und die Grenzen der Vernunft: Kants Moraltheologie. Aufklärung, 21, 117–145.
11.
EvensA. (2006). Object-oriented ontology, or programming’s creative fold. Angelika: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, 11(1), 89–97.
12.
FullertonT. (2014). Game Design Workshop (3rd Ed.). CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
13.
GolumbiaD. (2009). The Cultural Logic of Computation. Harvard University Press.
14.
GrondinJ. (2007). Derrida and the question of the animal (Cadenza Acadamic, Trans.). Cités, 30(2), 31–39.
15.
JoqueJ. (2016). The invention of the object: object orientation and the philosophical development of programming languages. Philosophy & Technology, 29(335), 335–356.
16.
KantI. (1987). Critique of Judgement (Werner S. Pluhar, Trans., p. 99). Hackett Publishing.
17.
KuklaR. (2005). The antinomies of pure reason: Rousseau and Kant on the metaphysics of truth-telling. Inquiri. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 48(3), 203–231.
18.
LarsenL. J. (2012). Objects of desire: A reading of the reward system in world of warcraft in eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 6(1), 15–24.
PristleyM. (2011). A Science of Operations. Springer.
26.
RearickA. (2004). Why is the only good orc a dead orc? The dark face of racism examined in Tolkien’s world. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 50(4), 861–874.
27.
ShinkleE. (2010). Video games and the technological sublime. Tate Papers, 14. Autumn.
SmithB. (1996). On the Origin of Objects. MIT Press.
30.
TodorovT. (1975). The Fantastic – A Structural Approach to Literary Genre. Cornell University Press.
31.
TuringA. (1937). On computable numbers an application to the entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of. London Math Society, 42(2), 230–265.
32.
Van GennepA. (1960). The Rites of Passage. The University of Chicago Press.
33.
WaltherB. K. (2020). Lights behind thick curtains: Images of fear and familiarity in tolkien. Tolkien Studies, 17, 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1353/tks.2020.0005
