The kill cams represent a common feature in many shooters, but little is said about their technological and bodily implications in game studies. By examining postphenomenologically the kill cams code, this article highlights the fact that these gamic cams provoke players to a bodily rethinking of death and failure. The way in which kill cams are embedded is an important topic in understanding their functionality, as it is the very code that determines the power that is attributed to these technologies. Conceiving these kill cams is also a matter of technological mediation, so that one’s own visualization after death produces a sort of objectivity-subjectivity inversion. While the gameplay itself encompasses multiple embodiment relationships, it is noticed that the kill cams’ code of some games completely restricts the player’s agency and rather favors a mere hermeneutic interpretation of its own death.
AaronM. (2014). Death and the moving image: Ideology, iconography, and I. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
2.
AydinC.WogeM. G.VerbeekP. P. (2019). Technological environmentality: Conceptualizing technology as a mediating milieu. Philosophy & Technology, 32(2), 321–338.
3.
BaradK. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
4.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
5.
BergenJ. P.,VerbeekP. (2021). To-do is to be: Foucault, Levinas, and technologically mediated subjectivation. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 325–348.
Call of Duty. (2010). Call of Duty® | Best-selling video game Franchise. Call of Duty: Black Ops. Retrieved November 5, 2021, fromhttps://www.callofduty.com/nl/
De Mesquita NetoJ. A.,BeckerK. (2018). Relating conversational topics and toxic behavior effects in a MOBA game. Entertainment Computing, 26, 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2017.12.004
13.
De MulJ. (2010). Cyberspace Odyssey: Towards a virtual ontology and anthropology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
IhdeD. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
18.
IhdeD. (2002). Bodies in technology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
IhdeD. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20.
IngoldT. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
21.
IntronaL. D. (2011). The enframing of code: Agency, originality and the plagiarist. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411418131
22.
IntronaL. D.,HayesN. (2011). On sociomaterial imbrications: What plagiarism detection systems reveal and why it matters. Information and Organization, 21(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.03.001
23.
JuulJ. (2013). The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. Cambridge: MIT press.
24.
KeoghB. (2018). A play of bodies. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
25.
KittlerF. (1996). The history of communication media (pp. 7–30). CTheory.
LussaultM. (2013). L’avènement du monde. Essai sur l’habitation humaine de la Terre. Paris, France: Seuil.
32.
MbembeA. (2008). Necropolitics. In Foucault in an age of terror (pp. 152–182). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
PhillipsA. (2018). Shooting to kill: Headshots, twitch reflexes, and the mechropolitics of video games. Games and Culture, 13(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015612611
34.
RosenbergerR.,VerbeekP. P. (Eds.) (2015). Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations. London: Lexington Books.
35.
SalenK.,ZimmermanE. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
SallisJ. (Ed.). (1987). Deconstruction and philosophy: The texts of jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
SherryJ.LucasK.GreenbergB.LachlanK. (2006). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. In VordererP.BryantJ. (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses and consequences (pp. 213-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawernce Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
VerbeekP. P. (2008). Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9099-x
43.
VindenesJ.,WassonB. (2021). A postphenomenological framework for studying user experience of immersive virtual reality. Frontiers Virtual Reality, 2, 656423. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.656423
44.
WangJ.XuC.ChngE.WahK.TianQ. (2004, October). Automatic replay generation for soccer video broadcasting. In Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, New York, October 10-16, 2004 (pp. 32–39).
45.
WinnerL. (1980). Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus, 109, 121-136.
