This essay develops the concept of “quantified play” to describe and analyze the recent practice of self-tracking in the play of videogames. I argue that statistical, self-tracking utilities in videogames shape how gameplay “appears” and how it is experienced and valued by users. I proceed by situating contemporary self-tracking in games as part of a broader history of play as “quantified.” From there, drawing on interdisciplinary studies of self-tracking, as well as Bernard Stiegler’s postphenomenological analyses of technology, I characterize quantified play in three main ways. First, it is voluntary and occupied with self-knowledge. Second, it is used in mundane or everyday contexts. Third, it relates to the habitual faculty of users. The remainder of the essay illustrates the concept of quantified play through two examples of tracking hardware and software—showing how numerical or statistical apprehensions of player activity (and visualizations thereof) shape how we negotiate videogames.
AshJ. (2012b). Technology, technicity, and emerging practices of temporal sensitivity in videogames. Environment and Planning A, 44, 187–203.
4.
AshJ. (2015). The interface envelope: Gaming, technology, power. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
5.
BartramL.PatraA.StoneM. (2017). Affective color in visualization. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1364–1374). New York, NY: ACM Press.
6.
BeerD. (2015). Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism. Big Data & Society, 2, 1–12.
BennettT.DodsworthF.NobleG.PooveyM.WatkinsM. (2013). Habit and habituation: Governance and the social. Body & Society, 19, 3–29.
9.
BogostI. (2013). Alien phenomenology, or, what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10.
BowenG. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 12–23.
11.
BradleyA. (2011). Originary technicity: The theory of technology from Marx to Derrida. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
CarterM.GibbsM.HarropM. (2012). Metagames, paragames and orthogames: A new vocabulary. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 11–17), New York, NY: ACM Press.
13.
ConsalvoM. (2007). Cheating: Gaining advantage in videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14.
CrawfordK.LingelJ.KarppiT. (2015). Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18, 479–496.
15.
CroganP. (2011). Gameplay mode: War, simulation and technoculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
CroganP. (2016). War, mathematics, and simulation: Drones and (losing) control of battlespace. In HarriganP.KirschenbaumM. (Eds.), Zones of control: Perspectives on wargaming (pp. 641–667). Cambridge: MIT Press.
17.
CroganP.KennedyH. (2009). Technologies between games and culture. Games and Culture, 4, 107–114.
GreggM. (2013). Inside the data spectacle. Television and New Media, 16, 37–51.
27.
GroszE. (2013). Habit today: Ravaisson, Bergson, Deleuze and us. Body & Society, 19, 219–239.
28.
HandM.GoreaM. (2018). Digital traces and personal analytics: iTime, self-tracking and the temporalities of practice. International Journal of Communication, 12, 666–682.
29.
HansenM. B. N. (2015). Feed-forward: On the future of twenty-first century media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
HeideggerM. (1962). Being and time. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
KellyR.WattsL.PayneS. (2016). Can visualization of contributions support fairness in collaboration? Findings from meters in an online game. In CCSW ‘16 Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 664–678). New York, NY: ACM Press.
KouY.GuiX. (2018). Entangled with numbers: Quantified self and others in a team-based online game. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 1–25.
37.
LatourB. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10, 205–209.
LuptonD. (2014a). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17, 440–453.
40.
LuptonD. (2014b). Self-tracking cultures: Towards a sociology of personal informatics. In OzCHI ‘14 Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on designing futures: The future of design (pp. 77–86). New York, NY: ACM Press.
41.
LuptonD. (2016). The quantified self. Cambridge, England: Polity.
42.
LuptonD. (2017). Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 19, 1599–1614.
43.
LuptonD. (2018). How do data come to matter? Living and becoming with personal data. Big Data & Society, 5, 1–11.
44.
LuptonD.PinkS.LaBondC.SumartojoS. (2018). Personal data contexts, data sense and self-tracking cycling. International Journal of Communication, 12, 647–665.
45.
MassumiB. (1987). Notes on the translation and acknowledgements. In DeleuzeG.GuatarriF. (Eds.), A thousand plateaus (pp. 9–20). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
PaulC. (2018). The toxic meritocracy of video games: Why gaming culture is the worst. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
51.
PinkS.ForsV. (2017). Being in a mediated world: Self-tracking and the mind-body-environment. Cultural Geographies, 24, 375–388.
52.
PinkS.SumartojoS.LuptonD.La BondC. (2017). Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living. Big Data & Society, 4, 1–12.
StieglerB. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55.
StieglerB. (2010a). For a new critique of political economy. Cambridge, England: Polity.
56.
StieglerB. (2010b). Memory. In MitchellW. J. T.HansenM. B. N. (Eds.), Critical terms for media studies (pp. 64–87). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57.
StieglerB. (2011). Technics and time, 3: Cinematic time and the question of malaise. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
58.
StieglerB. (2015). Automatic society: The future of work. Cambridge, England: Polity.
59.
TaylorT. L. (2006). Does WoW change everything? How a PvP server, multinational player base, and surveillance mod scene caused me pause. Games and Culture, 1, 318–337.
60.
ThompsonE.LutzA.CosmelliD. (2005). Neurophenomenology: An introduction for neurophilosophers. In BrookA.AkinsK. (Eds.), Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement (pp. 40–97). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61.
ThriftN. (2004). Movement-space: The changing domain of thinking resulting from the development of new kinds of spatial awareness. Economy and Society, 33, 582–604.
VellossoE.CarterM. (2016). The emergence of EyePlay: A survey of eye interaction in games. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 171–185). New York, NY: ACM Press.
65.
WangJ.O’KaneA.NewhouseN.Sethu-HonesG.de BarbaroK. (2017). Quantified baby: Parenting and the use of a baby wearable in the wild. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: ACM Press.
66.
WenzK. (2013). Theorycrafting: Knowledge production and surveillance. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 178–193.
