This article examines the experience of the sublime engendered by video games and the function of immersion and interactivity in producing this effect. A close inspection of the history of the sublime as an aesthetic principle and related cultural practices reveals that the elements of immersion, interactivity, and virtuality were already integral to Burke’s seminal conceptualization, as well as in architecture and visual media, before the emergence of digital media. The techniques and technologies of the immersive sublime deployed by preexisting spatial and visual art forms are inherited, revised, and enhanced in video games, as demonstrated by the analysis of the undersea exploration game ABZÛ. In this sense, the video game simultaneously marks the continuation of and new developments in the interlinked histories of the sublime and technology.
AarsethE. (2000). Allegories of space: The question of spatiality in computer games. In EskelinenM.KoskimaaR. (Eds.), Cybertext yearbook 2000 (pp. 152−171). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
2.
AshfieldA.De BollaP. (1996). Introduction. In AshfieldA.De BollaP. (Eds.), The sublime: A reader in British eighteenth-century aesthetic theory (pp. 1−16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BurkeE. (1759/1998). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful (2nd ed.). Oxford: University Press.
8.
CairnsP.CoxA.NordinA. I. (2014). Immersion in digital games: Review of gaming experience research. In AngelidesM. C.AgiusH. (Eds), Handbook of digital games (pp. 337−361). Hoboken, NJ: IEEE Press & Wiley. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118796443.ch12
CostelloeT. (2012). A short introduction to a long history. In CostelloeT. M. (Ed.), The sublime: From antiquity to the present (pp. 1−7). NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
DuffyC. (2013). The landscapes of the sublime 1700–1830: Classic ground. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
EtlinR. A. (2012). Architecture and the sublime. In CostelloeT. M. (Ed.), The sublime: From antiquity to the present (pp. 230−274). NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FedorovaK. (2017). The ambiguity effects of the techno-sublime. In TrifonovaT. (Ed.), Contemporary visual culture and the sublime (pp. 142−150). NY: Routledge. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315299150-10
14.
FromSoftware. (2011). Dark Souls. Video game. Lyon:Namco Bandai Games.
15.
FromSoftware. (2015). Bloodborne. Video game. CA: Sony Computer Entertainment.
16.
Giant Squid Studios. (2016). Abzû. Video game. CA: 505 Games.
17.
GregersenA.GrodalT. (2008). Embodiment and interface. In PerronB.WolfM. J. P. (Eds.), The video game theory reader 2 (pp. 87−106). NY: Routledge.
Hello Games. (2016). No Man’s sky. Video game. London: Hello Games.
21.
IbataH. (2018). The challenge of the sublime: From Burke’s Philosophical Enquiry to British Romantic art. SI: Manchester University Press.
22.
Japan Studio & Team Ico. (2005). The Shadow of the Colossus. Video game. Tokyo: Sony Computer Entertainment.
23.
KantI. (1790/2000). Critique of the power of judgment. NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KirwanJ. (2017). The popular sublime and the notional sublime. In TrifonovaT. (Ed.), Contemporary visual culture and the sublime (pp. 64−73). NY: Routledge. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315299150-4
25.
KlassenC. (2012). ‘Avatar’, dark green religion, and the technological construction of nature. Chemical Society Reviews, 18(2), 74−88. https://dx.doi.org/10.5130/csr.v18i2.2757
26.
KrzywinskaT. (2002). Hands on horror. In KingG.KrzywinskaT. (Eds.), Screenplay: Cinema/videogames/interfaces (pp. 206−223). London: Wallflower Press.
McMahanA. (2013). Immersion, engagement, and presence: A method for analyzing 3-D video games. In PerronB.WolfM. J. P. (Eds.), The video game theory reader (pp. 89−108). NY: Routledge.
29.
MeadesA. (2015). Beyond the animated landscape: Videogame glitches and the sublime. In PallantC. (Ed.), Animated landscapes: History, form, and function (pp. 269−285). London: Bloomsbury. https://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781501304804.ch-016
RyanV. L. (2001). The physiological sublime: Burke's critique of reason. Journal of the History of Ideas, 62(2), 265−279. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2001.0018
46.
ShawI. G. R.WarfB. (2009). Worlds of affect: Virtual geographies of video games. Environment and Planning A, 41(6), 1332−1343. https://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a41284
47.
ShinkleE. (2012). Videogames and the digital sublime. In KaratzogianniA.KuntsmanA. (Eds), Digital cultures and the politics of emotion: Feelings, affect and technological change (pp. 94−108). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/97802303913456
48.
TrifonovaT. (2017). Editor’s introduction. In TrifonovaT. (Ed.), Contemporary visual culture and the sublime (pp. 1−41). NY: Routledge. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315299150-1
49.
TuckG. (2008). When more is less: CGI, spectacle and the capitalist sublime. Science Fiction Film and Television, 1(2), 249−273. https://dx.doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.1.2.4
WilsonS. (2017). The aesthetics of immersion and detachment in the British natural sublime: A historical perspective. Environment, Space, Place, 9(1), 43−62.
