Video games such as the successful Assassin’s Creed series allow consumers to engage with various historical contexts and to explore them in engaging and influential ways. However, it is unclear what consumers understand as the difference between the historical authenticity and historical accuracy used by developers in these games. Therefore, this research explored players of Assassin’s Creed games’ understanding of these two concepts and how they expected developers to utilize them. The study used a qualitative analysis of 959 online forum comments and an online survey with 88 respondents. While it was found that players understood historical accuracy and valued it in video games, historical authenticity prompted confusion with 43% describing it as the same as historical accuracy. The results were used to develop a new player-centric definition of historical authenticity to clarify player understandings and present useful and practical implications for developers and publishers.
ÅkerlindG. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.642845
2.
ApperleyT. H. (2006). Genre and game studies: Toward a critical approach to video game genres. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1046878105282278
3.
ApperleyT. H. (2018). Counterfactual communities: Strategy, games, paratexts and the player’s experience of history. Open Libraries of Humanities, 4(1), 1–22. http://doi.org/10.16995/olh.286
4.
BalelaM. S.MundyD. (2016). Exploring approaches to the generation and representation of heritage artefacts in video game contexts. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 26(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1326365X16640347
BurgessJ.JonesC. (2020). ‘I harbour strong feelings for Tali despite her being a fictional character’: Investigating videogame players’ emotional attachments to non-player characters. Game Studies, 20(1). http://gamestudies.org/2001/articles/burgessjones
CampbellJ. (2008). Just less than Total War: Simulating World War II as ludic nostalgia. In: Playing the past: History and nostalgia. In WhalenZ.TaylorL. N. (Eds.), Video games (pp. 183–200). Vanderbilt University Press.
ChapmanA.FokaA.WestinJ. (2017). Introduction: What is historical game studies?Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, 21(3), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2016.1256638
13.
ChristensenP.MachadoD. (2010). Video games and classical antiquity. Classical World: John Hopkins University Press, 104(1), 107–110. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/406986/summary
14.
CopplestoneT. J. (2017). But that’s not accurate: The differing perceptions of accuracy in cultural-heritage videogames between creators, consumers and critics. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, 21(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2017.1256615
de ZamaroćzyN. (2017). Are we what we play? Global politics in historical strategy computer games. International Studies Perspectives, 18(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekv010
17.
DuttonD. (2003). Authenticity in art. In LevinsonJ. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics (pp. 258–274). Oxford University Press.
FentyS. (2008). Why old school is “cool”: A brief analysis of classic video game nostalgia. In TaylorL. N.WhalenZ. (Eds.), Playing the past: History and nostalgia in video games (pp. 19–31). Vanderbilt University Press.
20.
FlessF.GrafB.DallyO.FrankeU.GerbichC.LengyelD.KnautM. R.NäserC.SavoyB.SteudtnerK.TaschnerM.ToulouseC.WeberS. (2016). Authenticity and communication. In GraßhoffG.MeyerM. (Eds.), Special volume 6: Space and knowledge. Topoi research group Articles (pp. 481–524). Exzellenzcluster 264 Topoi.
21.
FordD. (2016). EXplore, eXpand, eXploit, eXterminate’: Affective writing of postcolonial history and education in Civilization V. Game Studies, 16(2). http://gamestudies.org/1602/articles/ford
22.
GhittaC.AndrikopoulosG. (2009). Total War and Total Realism: A battle for antiquity in computer game history. In LoweD.ShahabudinK. (Eds.), Classics for all: Reworking antiquity in mass culture (pp. 109–126).Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
23.
GuestG.MacQueenK. M.NameyE. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publishing.
24.
HarrisK. (2017). ‘Part of the project of that book was not to be authentic’: Neo-historical authenticity and its anachronisms in contemporary historical fiction. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, 21(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2017.1315968
25.
HjorthL. (2011). Games and gaming.Berg.
26.
KoskiJ. (2017). Reflections of history: Representations of the Second World War in Valkyria Chronicles. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, 21(3), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2016.1256625
27.
KozinetsR. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
PetersonR. D.MillerA. J.FedorkoS. J. (2013). The same river twice: Exploring historical representation and the value of simulation in the Total War, Civilization, and Patrician franchises. In KapellM. W.ElliottA. B. R. (Eds.), Playing with the past: Digital games and the simulation of history (pp. 31–48). Bloomsbury Academic.
PooleS. (2018). Ghosts in the garden: Locative gameplay and historical interpretation from below. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2017.1347887
37.
PostigoH. (2007). Of mods and modders: Chasing down the value of fan-based digital game modifications. Games and Culture, 2(4), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412007307955
38.
ReidE.DuffyK. (2018). A netnographic sensibility: Developing the netnographic/social listening boundaries. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3–4), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1450282
39.
SalvatiA. J.BullingerJ. M. (2013). Selective authenticity and the playable past. In KapellM. W.ElliottA. B. R. (Eds.), Playing with the past: Digital games and the simulation of history (pp. 153–168). Bloomsbury Academic.
ScholzJ.SmithA. N. (2019). Branding in the age of social media firestorms: How to create brand value by fighting back online. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(11–12), 1100–1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1620839
42.
SchutK. (2007). Strategic simulations and our past: The bias of computer games in the presentation of history. Games and Culture, 2(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1555412007306202
43.
SpringD. (2015). Gaming history: Computer and video games as historical scholarship. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, 19(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2014.973714
44.
SteinL. E. (2015). Millennial fandom: Television audiences in the transmedia age.University of Iowa Press.
