Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article uses the Bourdieusian tradition to examine the relationship between gameplay elements and contentious politics. When investigating Chinese progressive social movements, this study found that the development of local gaming industries has conditioned three ways in which gameplay elements are employed to organize “playful resistance”: game as an action tactic, game as the mechanism for critical pedagogics, and game as a tool for public education. Gaming capital has become a useful resource for organizing contentious activities and disseminating progressive political views. Two forms of gaming capital are identified: one is the technical competencies needed to design games; the other is the cultural capacity to imagine social movements through game design mechanisms. This article shows how playful resistance challenges both authoritarian governance and the capitalist logic of gaming, offering a glimpse into how the actual process of gamification has taken place in a non-Western context.

Keywords

gaming capital playful resistance social movement Bourdieu China

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashtari

de Lange

(2019). Playful civic skills: A transdisciplinary approach to analyse participatory civic games. Cities, 89, 70-79. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.022

Bourdieu

(1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu

(1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson

J. G.

(Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Westport: Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu

(2005). The social structures of the economy. Cambridge: Polity.

Cassar

(2013). Gramsci and games. Games and Culture, 8(5), 330-353. doi:10.1177/1555412013493499

Chan

(2014). Chinese entertainment. London: Routledge.

Cheung

C. K. F.

Fung

(2016). Globalizing the Chinese online game industry: From incubation and hybridization to structural expansion in the past two decades. In Fung

(Ed.), Global game industries and cultural policy (pp. 71-90). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chew

M. M.

(2016). A critical cultural history of online games in China, 1995-2015. Games and Culture, 14(3), 195-215. doi:10.1177/1555412016661457

Consalvo

(2007). Cheating: Gaining advantage in videogames. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

10.

Crossley

(2002). Making sense of social movements. Buckingham: Open University Press.

11.

Crossley

(2003). From reproduction to transformation: Social movement fields and the radical habitus. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(6), 43-68. doi:10.1177/0263276403206003

12.

Frith

(2013). Turning life into a game: Foursquare, gamification, and personal mobility. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(2), 248-262. doi:10.1177/2050157912474811

(2014). Enlightening the galaxy: How players experience political philosophy in star wars: The old republic. Games and Culture, 9(4), 255-276. doi:10.1177/1555412014538810

14.

Goggin

(2018). “How do those danish bastards sleep at night?”: Fan labor and the power of cuteness. Games and culture, 13(7), 747-764. doi:10.1177/1555412018760918

15.

Gransow

Zhu

(2014). Labour rights and beyond-how migrant worker NGOs negotiate Urban spaces in the pearl river delta. Population, Space and Place, 22, 185-198. doi:10.1002/psp.1894

(2016). Is China’s new overseas NGO management law sounding the death knell for civil society? Maybe not. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 14(3), 1-14.

17.

Huang

V. G.

(2017). Organisational change, ideologies and mega discourses. Journal of Language and Politics, 17(1), 70-91. doi:10.1075/jlp.17015.hua

18.

Huang

V. G.

(2018). Floating control: Examining factors affecting the management of the civil society sector in authoritarian China. Social Movement Studies, 17(4), 378-392. doi:10.1080/14742837.2018.1460264

(2012). Hong Kong’s democratic movement and the making of China’s offshore civil society. Asian Survey, 52(3), 504-527. doi:10.1525/as.2012.52.3.504

20.

Ibrahim

(2015). Bourdieu and social movements: Ideological struggles in the British anti-capitalist movement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

(2012). “Movement schools” and dialogical diffusion of nonviolent praxis: Nashville workshops in the southern civil rights movement. Nonviolent Conflict and Civil Resistance, 34, 155-184. doi:10.1108/S0163-786X(2012)0000034010

(1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

23.

Kelly

(2018). The game of politics: Examining the role of work, play, and subjectivity formation in papers, please. Games and Culture, 13(5), 459-478. doi:10.1177/1555412015623897

(2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326-343. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000014

(2013). The power of instability: Unraveling the microfoundations of bargained authoritarianism in China. American Journal of Sociology, 118(6), 1475-1508. doi:10.1086/670802 .

26.

Lee

F. L. F.

(2015a). Internet alternative media use and oppositional knowledge. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 27(3), 318-340. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edu040

27.

Lee

F. L. F.

(2015b). Social movement as civic education: Communication activities and understanding of civil disobedience in the umbrella movement. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(4), 393-411. doi:10.1080/17544750.2015.1057192

(2018). Media and protest logics in the digital era: The umbrella movement in Hong Kong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

29.

Liu

(2019). Video games as dating platforms: Exploring digital intimacies through a Chinese online dancing video game. Television & New Media, 20(1), 36-55. doi:10.1177/1527476417736614

30.

Liu

Lai

(2020). From non-player characters to othered participants: Chinese women’s gaming experience in the ‘free’ digital market. Information, Communication & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1791217

31.

MacKinnon

(2011). Liberation technology: China’s “networked authoritarianism”. Journal of Democracy, 22(2), 32-46. doi: 10.1353/jod.2011.0033

(1987). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. In Zald

M. N.

McCarthy

J. D.

(Eds.), Social movements in an organizational society: Collective essays (pp. 15-42). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

33.

McKernan

(2019). Digital texts and moral questions about immigration: Papers, please and the capacity for a video game to stimulate socio-political discussion. Games and Culture. doi:10.1177/1555412019893882

(2010). Donning red underwear to play mahjong: Superstitious beliefs and problem gambling among Chinese mahjong players in Macau. Gambling Research, 22(1), 18-33.

35.

Oxfeld

(1993). Blood, sweat, and mahjong: Family and enterprise in an overseas Chinese community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

36.

Pelling

(2011). The (short) prehistory of ‘gamification’. Retrived from https://nanodome.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/the-short-prehistory-of-gamification/.

37.

Plantin

J.-C.

Lagoze

Edwards

P. N.

Sandvig

(2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293-310. doi:10.1177/1461444816661553

(2014). Worker−intellectual unity: Trans-border sociological intervention in Foxconn. Current Sociology, 62(2), 209-222. doi:10.1177/0011392113514892

(2010). Games for civic learning: A conceptual framework and agenda for research and design. Games and Culture, 5(2), 199-235. doi:10.1177/1555412009354728

40.

Ruberg

(2019). Representing sex workers in video games: Feminisms, fantasies of exceptionalism, and the value of erotic labor. Feminist Media Studies, 19(3), 313-330. doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1477815

41.

Samuel

(2013). Symbolic violence and collective identity: Pierre Bourdieu and the ethics of resistance. Social Movement Studies, 12(4), 397-413. doi:10.1080/14742837.2013.823345

42.

Shaw

(2009). Putting the gay in games. Games and Culture, 4(3), 228-253. doi:10.1177/1555412009339729

43.

Simmel

(1949). The sociology of sociability. American Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 254-261. doi:10.1086/220534

44.

Sotamaa

(2009). Achievement unlocked: Rethinking gaming capital. In The future and reality of gaming conference 2009, Vienna, Austria, 30 November-4 December.

45.

Stokes

Williams

(2018). Gamers who protest. Games and Culture, 13(4), 327-348. doi:10.1177/1555412015615770

(2015). Alienated playbour: Relations of production in EVE online. Games and Culture, 10(4), 365-388. doi:10.1177/1555412014565507

47.

Taylor

T. L.

(2018). Watch me play: Twitch and the rise of game live streaming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

48.

Van Laer

Van Aelst

(2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1-26. doi:10.1080/13691181003628307

49.

Wei

(2015). Street, behavior, art: Advocating gender rights and the innovation of a social movement repertoire. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 1(2), 279-304. doi:10.1177/2057150X15579151

(2017). From manual to automated to digital: On transmediality, technological specificity, and playful practice in mahjong. Games and Culture, 14(6), 639-659. doi:10.1177/1555412017721840

51.

Chan

C. K.-C.

(2017). Conductive activism: Anti-sweatshop campaigns across Hong Kong and Mainland China. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(1), 88-112. doi:10.1080/00472336.2017.1359651

52.

Yang

(2009). The power of the internet in China: Citizen activism online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Yang

(2015). China’s contested internet. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press.

54.

Zhang

(2016). The Internet and new social formation in China: Fandom publics in the making. London: Routledge.

Gamifying Contentious Politics: Gaming Capital and Playful Resistance

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References